Weather Morning: 9°c Sunny spells Afternoon: 10°c Sunny spells

Film

London,

Factory Girl

Cert: 15

Description: Sienna Miller does her best in this biopic of It-girl-who-lost-it Edie Sedgwick, but the film around her is disappointingly average - a criminal offence when you've got Warhol (Guy Pearce), the Factory crowd and a Dylan-like singer at your disposal.



Rating: 2 out of 5 Derek Malcolm's rating
Rating: 3 out of 5

Reader rating

Your rating

one star two star three star four star five star

Click on a star to rate

Dir: George Hickenlooper.

Cast: Sienna Miller, Guy Pearce, Hayden Christensen, Jimmy Fallon

Country: US.

Year: 2006.

Duration: 90mins

Showing at

Smiling Sienna too good for Factory

Golden couple: Miller and Pearce as Sedgwick and Warhol in Factory Girl
Golden couple: Miller and Pearce as Sedgwick and Warhol in Factory Girl

By Derek Malcolm
14 Mar 2007


Anyone who doubts Sienna Miller's acting ability will be pleasantly surprised by her performance as Edie Sedgwick, the anorexic Radcliffe girl who became a style legend and a star of Andy Warhol films such as The Chelsea Girls.

The pity is that she appears in so scrappy and unconvincing a film; it gives her less chance than she deserves to complete a fully rounded portrait.

Guy Pearce plays a cold, emotionally dry and blank-eyed Warhol who, having used Edie, seems to throw her away.

And there's Hayden Christensen as Billy Quinn, the singer-songwriter, clearly based on Bob Dylan, who tries to save her from herself. They are presented as lovers, which Dylan denies, although he admits that his album Blonde On Blonde and its song Just Like A Woman had Sedgwick in mind.

The film - which opens in 1965 and ends in 1971, when Sedgwick overdosed and died from barbiturate poisoning at the age of 28 - does little service to Edie or Warhol.

He is presented as an artist sucking energy from those around him in the Factory, and paying them a pittance for the privilege. She is characterised as a well-bred and feisty party girl whose rejection and self-destructive impulses lead to her drug-fuelled end. The hideous abuse she suffered from her parents is hardly mentioned.

Both these assessments are feasible, but director George Hickenlooper doesn't allow us more than a glimpse at the reasons behind such essentially dime-store psychology. Factory Girl is too bitty and too obviously on the surface to engage us fully.

What's more, the New York scene of the Sixties is dispatched with scarcely a hint at the creative renewal that Warhol and his cohorts represented, both as artists and film-makers.

Yet, despite everything, Miller manages to hold the attention throughout. She has, apart from anything else, a wonderful smile, and a capacity to make you believe when it is wiped off her face.

She lets you see why Warhol made her a star, if not why he suddenly deserted her. Was it her own fault or not? We are never really told. Perhaps there isn't a clear answer - but it is surely the job of a film-maker to attempt one.

Details are correct at the time of publication - please check with venue before booking.

Reader views (1)

 Add your view

Sienna Miller was too robust, I wanted a more fey, fragile, vulnerable Radcliffe. Guy Pearce was a wonderful Warhol, vacant, glamorous and all-consuming, I would see 'Factory Girl' for his performance.

- Derek, London, 14/03/2007 12:32
Report abuse


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.