Serious fun as Spider-Man 3 weaves new spell
By
Charlotte O'Sullivan
19 Apr 2007
In Hollywood, sequel opportunities rule. Until recently, it was assumed that Spider-Man 3 would mark the end of the line for our sticky-fingered friend, yet the web is already buzzing with talk of a fourth adventure.
The good news is that this pacey, rainbow-coloured blockbuster works both as a filler and a finale. It's easily the best of the trilogy and, for my money, one of the most enjoyable films of the decade.
The comic-book-inspired franchise has always been about the search for balance; ironically, balance is was exactly what the first two movies lacked, with the seriously good cast continually upstaged by the special effects.
This time round, thanks to an inventive script, all the elements are in sync. The plot gives New York photographer Peter Parker aka Spider-Man (Tobey Maguire) three foes to contend with - four, if you count his battle with himself, which is brought on by an alien landing and subsequently turns his suit jet-black.
His love life is also a mess. He keeps trying, and failing, to propose to Kirsten Dunst's Mary Jane, who is suffering a career setback and does not appreciate the arrival of sweet blonde, Gwen Stacy (Bryce Dallas Howard).
The villains are well-rounded, with Flint Marko a joy to behold. Actor Thomas Haden Church has a great, Depression era face and his transformation into The Sandman is spectacularly beautiful - the creature is like a Henry Moore sculpture.
Meanwhile, Peter, Mary Jane and their rich friend Harry Osborn (James Franco) convince as fragile, ambitious twentysomethings trying to make it in the big city. All the encounters are emotionally intense. They're also full of humour. "Where do they get these guys?" says Spidey, tipping out sand from his boots.
Hats off to Maguire. It can't be easy playing boyish at 31, and, at times, he certainly looks rough: a middle-aged baby, all tremulous lips and bulging, vacant blue eyes.
Mostly, though, he does fine, and his spell as a vengeful evil doer - he acquires eyeliner, a Franz Ferdinand fringe and some dodgy disco moves - is hilarious.
Perhaps the film-makers are trying to steal some of Johnny Depp's thunder in the forthcoming Pirates of the Caribbean sequel. If so, it's a smart move. Cheekiness suits Maguire. It suits this franchise, too. Angst be damned. Spider-Man 3 is worth taking seriously, because it's so hell-bent on having fun.
Details are correct at the time of publication - please check with venue before booking.
Reader views (2)
I have heard many reviews finding it 'disappointing' and 'not a patch on its prequel'. All I can say is, what Spider-Man were you watching?
I found this 3rd installment easily the best in the series, with so much backstabbing, humour and action. Parker's vengeful side is not only a scary one, but a funny one. I couldn't get over the dance moves and the wooing. And the villains were top class; I had my doubts over three of them, but they have been used so effectively I'm already waiting for No. 4.
Oh, and I'm glad Maguire wasn't killed off.
- Cj, Stratford, London, 04/05/2007 19:50
Report abuse
Saw it last night. Disappointment. Story has no depth and draggy. CGI abused and confused (dog-fight?). The previous 2 Spiderman movie episodes are much better. Still, long live Spiderman!
- Richard C, UK, 04/05/2007 08:17
Report abuse
Morning:
8°c



















