Weather Tonight: 4°c Partly Cloudy Night Morning: 8°c Cloudy

Film

London,

Lonesome Jim

Cert: 15

Description: Blackly humorous study of depression and shattered dreams, revolving around a 27-year-old dreamer Jim, who leaves home and rural Indiana with pipe dreams of becoming a famous writer in New York. Reality bites hard and Jim returns home to his parents, having achieved little more than earning rent money by walking dogs. Clashing with his divorced other brother Tim, Jim is compelled to re-evaluate his shambolic life, but escaping from the vicious circle of despair and self-loathing takes more effort than Jim can muster.



Rating: 3 out of 5 Evening Standard rating
Not rated

Reader rating

Your rating

one star two star three star four star five star

Click on a star to rate

Dir: Steve Buscemi.

Cast: Casey Affleck, Liv Tyler, Mary Kay Place

Country: US.

Year: 2005.

Duration: 91mins

Showing at

The opposite of Hollywood

Liv Tyler
Romancing a sad-sack: Liv Tyler plays a nurse drawn to Lonesome Jim

10 Apr 2008


Actor-director Steve Buscemi is never likely to make a typical Hollywood movie — and the sad-sack protagonist of his third feature as director is the reverse of a Hollywood hero.

We first see Jim (Casey Affleck) returning to his home town in rural Indiana after failing as a writer in New York, where his last job was as a dog-walker.

He soon remembers why he left, as his doting, resolutely cheerful mum (Mary Kay Place) and his graceless dad (Seymour Cassel) try to tempt him to stay and do some work. He reluctantly agrees to do so when his equally depressed brother has an accident.

On the credit side, Jim manages to get a local nurse (Liv Tyler) into bed. But he is not very enthusiastic about that either. He asks himself the question — should he become a failure away from home, or just trudge on regardless in his own locale?

Buscemi’s portrait of working-class life is not exactly full of the joys of spring — almost everyone we meet is miserable in one way or another. But Lonesome Jim is a long way better than the usual empty rubbish that spatters the multiplexes, and worth seeing for a genuine attempt at some sort of dire truth.

Details are correct at the time of publication - please check with venue before booking.

Reader views (0)

 Add your view

No comments have so far been submitted.


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.