Farcical take on How to Lose Friends
By
Derek Malcolm
2 Oct 2008
This disappointingly farcical adaptation of Toby Young’s book about gaining a staff job at Vanity Fair and then ruining his chance has Simon Pegg as the author and Kirsten Dunst as the fellow worker he fancies.
But Robert B Weide’s film alters the emphasis of the book considerably. Pegg plays Young as a celebrity journo who is so silly that you have no idea why the proprietor (Jeff Bridges) risks taking him on in the first place. The upside to this is the innate charm of the actor himself — a facet of character even Toby might not claim.
We see Young landing a job at Sharps magazine (clearly a clone of Vanity Fair) and arriving in New York in a red T-shirt with Young, Dumb and Full of Come emblazoned across it. Before that, he has tried to get into the Baftas accompanied by a pig, and presided over the hysterical death throes of the Modern Review, the magazine he co-founded, in an office above a London kebab shop.
We don’t, however, see his unfortunate period as my deputy at The Guardian, where he regularly undercut my comments with withering observations about the films I liked (by such as Terence Davies) and high praise for every dumb action movie I decried.
Some of the film is very funny, especially the moment when he spots Orlando Bloom at a smart Fourth of June party and shouts: “You used to be English!” before drowning out the hired band with football chants. And there is one almost moving moment when the surrogate Young is faced in his dingy quarters in New York by his philosopher father (Bill Paterson), who quietly wonders whether he’s going about life the right way.
The rest, however, is largely dross, relying totally on Pegg’s prowess as a comedian and his ability to suggest a bounder with a mission to provoke but with a naïve desire to worm his way into the affections, or at least the consciousness, of ghastly celebrities and those who fawn on them.
The presence of Dunst, Bridges, Miriam Margolyes (as his permanently shocked landlady), Danny Hilton (as a lecherous executive) and Gillian Anderson (as a Devil Wears Prada-type bossy boots) would suggest we are going to have a better time than we actually do. But then the film’s ambitions are not high. It goes for easy laughs throughout. A few subtler ones — and there were a few in the book — have been hung out to dry.
Details are correct at the time of publication - please check with venue before booking.
Reader views (3)
I was looking forward to seeing this film as I enjoyed the book & found it very funny. However the humour in the film was not funny, but more pathetic & embarrassing. Something that hormonal teenage boys would find funny I imagine. A waste of time & dissapointing!
- Laura Richardson, London, 23/10/2008 11:56
Report abuse
One of the worst movies I have seen. Was looking forward to a laugh....being a comedy. Not sure I laughed once?! Biggest waster of 2 hours, a very depressing, unfunny movie. Thought it was very degrading & had a big element of bullying. I am only 34, I am not that old, how come I was one of the few in the theatre not laughing? I don't think I need a humour check, I am not a comedian but I am sure I could get more genuine laughs than this dross did - do not waste your time on this movie. Oh the chiquaqua being killed by the vase was really funny too - not!! And the 'Jesus' comment or kicking him in his bad leg. As for the mention above of the 'Engerlunnndd, Engerlun....' that wasn't funny, just totally embarrassing and squirmish. I am glad I wasn't a Brit watching that movie as I would feel a complete pillock! If this is the guy from 'Hot Fuzz', I did enjoy that movie - what went wrong?!
- Mark Anderson, London, 06/10/2008 11:47
Report abuse
Utterly dreadful and unfunny film - apparently our Lottery money paid for it!
- James Lizard, London, 04/10/2008 23:34
Report abuse
Morning:
9°c


















