Love and loathing in Revolutionary Road
By
Derek Malcolm
29 Jan 2009
There is a scene near the beginning of Sam Mendes’s film of Richard Yates’s brilliant novel about suburban boredom and marital discord when April, the wife of Frank, appears in a dire community theatre production of The Petrified Forest.
April (Kate Winslet, married in real-life to Mendes, as everyone must by now know) has aspirations as an actress and plays a greasy-spoon waitress who dreams of going to France. It is obvious, even to Frank (Leonardo DiCaprio), that she won’t make it in the theatre. But it is also obvious that, even if she doesn’t, April wants to make something of herself other than a Connecticut housewife.
So, like the waitress in the play, she decides it would be a great idea to leave her comfortable suburban life in the misnamed Revolutionary Road and take her husband and two children with her to Paris.
There, she could support him while he finds a job by working as a translator at the American Embassy. The plan is “to live life as if it matters”.
It seems a good idea even to Frank, who has joined the morning rush to work, suited and behatted, out of Grand Central Station (since this is the Fifties) and is beginning to become aware that life offers something a little more exciting than that march into oblivion accompanied by martinis after work and constant cigarettes.
He is, however, shallower than his wife and by this time there is, anyway, an empty space at the centre of their relationship, so when promotion comes his way, involving a deal more money, he begins to have his doubts. The marital bickering earlier hinted at now follows and flares into flaming rows.
Maybe Frank knows he will be neutered whatever he does. Maybe he is just in a state of funk. But the Paris venture looks increasingly impossible and the only risk he feels inclined to take is a desultory affair with an admiring young woman from the office (Zoe Kazan, who contributes a beautiful little cameo of another lost soul).
But, of course, it is Winslet and DiCaprio we are asked to watch closely. Winslet, in particular, displaying all the misdirected passion of April’s flailing character, gives a performance that puts her right up there with our best actors.
She has to be careful not to overdo things and never does, even when April’s nerves are at full stretch. Let us hastily forget the embarrassing mess she made of her acceptance speech when finding herself best actress at the Golden Globe awards but perhaps remember the fact that it can’t have been all that easy working under the direction of her husband for the first time.
Film Trailers by Filmtrailer.com
DiCaprio, her partner in Titanic, can’t match her for sheer watchability but he has improved vastly as an actor even if those starry, still youthful looks are a bit of a handicap.
There is, though, another really excellent performance in the movie, from Michael Shannon, Oscar-nominated as best supporting actor for his portrayal of the mentally disturbed son of the couple’s estate agent friend (Kathy Bates).
Invited to dinner with Frank and April, together with his anxious parents, he asks all the questions the couple have avoided about the efficacy of their Paris pipedream and provides suitably acid answers. He is like some idiot savant who knows the score better than they do and, after 37 shock treatments in hospital, he is able to give a devastating shock back to the warring couple. The party thus ends in near-farce.
The jolting ending, which I can’t give away, has its problems, and we strangely see little or nothing of the children. Nor is Revolutionary Road directed with more than a modicum of cinematic imagination. Its chief delights lie in the way Mendes marshals his actors, its impeccable Fifties production design and Roger Deakins’s cinematography which, as usual, enhances the look of the film without drawing attention to itself.
Yates, who wrote the 1961 novel and has been called the voice of the post-war age of anxiety, perhaps had less sympathy for Frank and April than Mendes. But the book is not tampered with unduly, for which virtue we should surely be grateful.
Mendes spells out the couple’s delusions and orchestrates their ferocious attacks upon each other with great skill, aided by a screenplay from Justin Haythe that tries hard to convey the way in which Yates burrows into the hearts and minds of two people incapable of living well, together or alone. The book and the film may be nailed to their Fifties period (everyone seems to smoke perpetually) but what Revolutionary Road says about not so quietly desperate lives is still appropriate today.
Details are correct at the time of publication - please check with venue before booking.
Reader views (5)
While I have not read this book, I was surprised to see Kate and Leonardo once again pitted together in a love movie. I must admit, I loved the 50's - which included the styles of the clothing worn by both men and women, the familiar carpeted and neat homes. One of the most impressive shots to me was the men, draped in suits and hats boarding the train to work. I love men in suits and hats! I loved the costumes that Kate wore. I was disappointed that the children had so little appearances. The most troubling part to me was trying to understand Kate's character and her decision to abort the third child. The arguments scenes were very believable. I was disappointed in one fact and that even in this time period, black people had a face in the 50's and yet there were no black characters in this film. Last, but not least, the driving force of this film, the reason I keep watching it over and over is the haunting effect of the MUSIC. I am anxious to try and obtain a copy of this piece. Though it was repetitive, it made the point of this drama seem more sad. I felt very sorry for Leonardo at the end. His life seemed to be over with only him and his thoughts while his children played merrily without a care in the world. A great movie that has lots of opportunities for heavy discussions in college classrooms. I think I'll get the book and see what was left out.
- Paula D. Ward, Antioch, TN USA, 29/01/2010 00:18
Report abuse
The Brit Awards got it right, Kate Winslett for 'The Reader' and not 'Revolutionary Road'. The former a credible film, and worthy, the latter less credible, fighting for its feeling of self-importance, which it never really achieves. It's ten years on from 'American Beauty,' and Sam Mendes has pitched a similar story; though not nearly as good. Aside from the 'stars' filling the screen, it could have been a TV drama. In truth nothing more than your bog-standard suburban domestic, set in the fifties, photographed and dressed very well. Sadly I still find that despite the ranting and raving, the screaming and shouting, Leonardo comes across as a spoilt teenager who just never quite got his own way as much as he wanted, and hard to take seriously.
- Roger Goldsmith, Southsea, Hants, 28/01/2010 23:18
Report abuse
Having read and loved the book by Richard Yates, a book that I found deeply affecting with a devastating ending, I was curious to see how so much angst with very little action could translate into a movie. Well back from seeing it, I have the answer : it does not translate into a movie at all.
Or maybe it is that Mendes completely forgot to involve the audience in his drama. I sat watching all that spent emotion and was left utterly cold. Who cares about these two losers with their uninteresting problem of going to Paris or not ? And oh ! an unexpected pregnancy is rather in the way, why of course, let's abort...I feel the subject has aged terribly and what is a riveting, cruel analysis of a tragic relationship in the book is , in this film, made as dry and interesting as a dead log. And without the context of the text, women are being perceived here as manipulative wives or oppressive mothers, leaving men as victims utterly at a loss how to behave.
Well, save the money of your seat and buy the book instead !
- Thalbach, Josephine, London, 28/01/2010 23:18
Report abuse
I agree with Rosalind. From Gilbert Grape, he was already a top-notch star. I thought his role in Blood Diamond should have won him an Oscar. Haven't actually watched the film but I'm sure Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio will not disappoint.
- Mich, Hong Kong, 28/01/2010 23:18
Report abuse
Derek, Leonardo has vastly improved as an actor? He has always been excellent - ever since Gilbert Grape. I know this is all subjective and yes, he does look about 12, but you are wrong diddly wrong wrong.
- Rosalind, London, 28/01/2010 23:18
Report abuse
Morning:
9°c

















