Weather Tonight: 9°c Light showers Morning: 14°c Overcast

Life & Style

Does your office have bad manners?
Serious business: Companies are exposing themselves to a higher risk of lawsuits and reputational damage

Does your office have bad manners?

Philip Delves Broughton
10.08.09

During my very first month on Fleet Street, I was asked to write a piece on a subject close to the heart of the newspaper editor I was working for.

I was 22 and had little idea of what I was doing. When I was done, the editor strode over to my desk and plunked himself down, his cigar billowing smoke into my face. After he had read the piece, he pressed the delete button until all my work had vanished. Then he rose, ignored me and told an older journalist to have a go at the same subject. I took the Central line home that evening feeling pretty crushed.

Not long afterwards, I saw the film Swimming with Sharks, in which Kevin Spacey plays a tyrannical film producer whose bullied assistant finally turns on him, kidnapping and torturing him in revenge. Compared with the life of a Hollywood underling, Fleet Street was pretty mild.

Close by in the City, men and women far older than me were being subjected daily to shouting, belittlement and every variety of professional humiliation. Memoirs of City life, like Geraint Anderson's Cityboy, brim with tales of adults tolerating almost anything in return for a pay cheque.

Whether it is the double first from Cambridge bullied into doing the thrice-daily Starbucks run for senior traders or the 45-year-old investment banker being bawled out by a client, incivility seems embedded in the City.

The problem with this behaviour, aside from a few raw feelings, is the subject of The Cost of Bad Behavior: How Incivility is Damaging Your Business and What to Do About It, a new book by two American professors, Christine Pearson and Christine Porath.

“Incivility does seem more severe in investment banking, where people are always shouting at each other, and in the entertainment industry,” says Porath. “But the truth is that every industry claims it's the worst.”

Pearson and Porath began their research looking at incidents of employees killing their colleagues. From this extreme, they worked back to examine every kind of workplace slight to understand why some forms of incivility are taken seriously, such as sexual harassment, while others are not.

Common examples of incivility, they found, included taking credit for other people's work, passing blame, checking emails during meetings, talking down to or not listening to others, making derogatory remarks and avoiding people.

What may seem trivial examples of bad office manners, they found, had a serious effect on morale and staff retention. Serious enough to get the attention of the companies with whom they shared their findings.

Before becoming an academic, Porath worked for a sports management and marketing company and had observed first-hand how people were affected by the constant belittlements, insults and verbal digs that were considered part of the firm's culture. Her research confirmed her fears.

After a single incident of incivility, not including anything sexual or physical, 48 per cent of the hundreds surveyed decreased their effort at work, 38 per cent intentionally decreased the quality of their work, 80 per cent wasted time worrying about the incident, 66 per cent said their performance declined and 78 per cent said their commitment to the firm declined.

Twelve per cent said they had left a company because of uncivil treatment. For firms already struggling with motivating and retaining staff, the figures were staggering. Behaviour which was regarded as everyday was actually deeply damaging.

“A lot of people don't realise what they're doing at the time,” says Porath. “And as people move up in an organisation, they are treated less and less honestly by their staff, so they have no idea how bad they are.”

There are a number of reasons for rude behaviour, but by far the most common is stress. Over 60 per cent of people blame bad behaviour on excessive work. They say they don't have time to be nice. Just four per cent say they do it because they like to.

Many older people feel they have a right to treat their juniors as they were treated. They are not just acting out of revenge, however, but through a sense that they are doing their subordinates a favour by toughening them up.

Whatever the reasons for someone's rudeness, says Porath, the perpetrator will eventually pay. If it's Donald Trump claiming that rudeness is a form of honesty, he will eventually run into the little old lady in Atlantic City who held up his casino developments for years by refusing to sell him her modest boarding house. Being nice is much more successful over the long term.

Men and women, the researchers found, are equal offenders, but they tend to respond to incivility in different ways. Women are more likely to avoid the person who mistreated them, go outside the firm for sympathy, and then plot a quiet revenge. Men tend to be more aggressive and eager to publicise their intent to get even.

For companies trying to contain incivility, Porath and Pearson have several recommendations. Start from the top. If the leaders get away with it, everyone will have a go. Hire polite people.

Train managers in what to look for. But most important, when incivility does occur, take it seriously. Don't brush it off as an employee being over-sensitive.

Many companies tolerate rudeness in otherwise very successful employees — the rainmakers and top salespeople, for example. But they are exposing themselves to the higher risk of lawsuits and serious reputational damage. No one should get a pass.

Finally, when an employee leaves, you should make sure to interview them six months later. Few people tell the truth on the way out of the door. But with some time to think, they may.

Reader views (10)

 Add your view

The interesting aspect is that both women and men tend to use incivility to their advantage. i remember a woman once scolded or rudely addressed exposed the vulnerability of the man who scolded her. The guy was under her control in private. In some case the movement of both of them towards this compromise (or better understanding)attempt ends up in both becoming good friends outside office. Man on the other hand finds a woman as a member of staff who can be easily subjected to subjugation and thus help the man to show his strength over his subordinaes. He cannot attempt on other men, as other men in the group may retort and he may ruin. But women in public may not normally do not retort instantly. For women the tears comes first. Later a sorry etc. is acceptable by them to repair the damage. The purpose of shouting and rude behaviour is achieved. Thus rude behaviour of someone is welcome by companies as it is used for establishing the leadership and suzertainty of the boss that ensure strong communication line up with other team members.

- Harihara Krishnan, london uk

Often the person concerned cannot see the problem. A friend of mine, who is a very talented professional, did not realise that she was a difficult colleague; she constantly criticised the work of others, made personal comments which were simply rude (she believed that she was being 'direct' and 'honest')and was eventually sidelined and encouraged to go freelance---which she did, with some success. Such people only realise that there is a problem when a colleague blows up and starts yelling and screaming at them. They are then filled with belwiderment ('What did I say?')

- Dectora, London UK

Mark (Venice): funny, but I have had the opposite experience: certainly some italian tourists in London have a tendency to barge onto the Tube without waiting for people to get off. More generally, having worked in the same place for 17 years I think manners are a lot better than in the past. Ceratinly if you are from a minority you don't live with the same fear of someone making a bigoted remark-that at least is some progress.

- Alan, London

I used to work with someone who used to complain about the smell of people's lunches (despite leaving smelly trainers and gym kit all around his desk for days on end), accuse colleagues of having smelly feet or criticise the smell of their perfume or deodorant, and insist on opening the window even on freezing winter days, forcing us to wear our coats at our desks. If we complained he would go into a sulk and shut it a millimetre or so, only to open it again as soon as one of us went to the loo. He has left now, and the atmosphere is totally different. It is amazing how one selfish bully can affect a whole office.

- Janey, London

For what it is worth I have found that the average British tourist in Italy is ruder and more arrogant than say twenty years ago. What they learn in the workplace they take on holiday. Italians, in general, are far more civil.

- Mark, Venice, Italy

I had the misfortune to work in the London office of a US mini investment bank. As the article says it starts from the top. The head of European operations they brought over was in my opinion a border line psychopath and it fed down how superiors there treated their staff.

- David Stephens, London

this seems to be bundling up a lot of nasty workplace behaviour under a new catch all heading - nothing new. Calling bullying and imtiidation "uncivility" doesnt't seem to add anything new to the debate.

Any of the behaviour cited in the article would be damming in an employment tribunal, so what is new - what does the research say apart from giving old problems a new name?

- Pete, London

From experience, I have noted the following: Respectable companies (including two large firms in the UK and US) that I have worked for, there is a default civility, simply because good management will not tolerate people of unsound persona - it isn't good for staff morale or business. On the other hand, the employers who I have found to accept envious and competitive behavior have had a fast staff turnaround and dubious reputation. (One is now defunct.) All said, the appalling manners and concept behind most (if not all) 'business' reality television is a terrible influence on the young and is only going to make things worse. Is it no wonder Britain is sinking? Honor is priceless.

- Oflife, Oxford & London

also this causes health problems for workers

- Ali B, phoenix,usa

What about the public sector? I worked in a large public sector organisation for five years before leaving to join a private company. There are a few rude people here, but working in the public sector was far, far worse. I was subjected to personal insults on a regular basis by my resentful line manager who, as she often said 'hated middle class people'. I was bullied incessantly by several women who enjoyed demeaning and insulting male colleagues whenever they felt like it and would scream 'sexual harassment' if a male ever dared answer back. I encountered one lazy colleague after another who refused to do their fair share, turned up when they felt like it and never seemed to get fired. Then there were the general office manners and etiquette which were, needless to say, absolutely appalling from almost everyone. It was a demoralizing and draining environment that I was pleased to leave for good.

- Richard, London


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.