Should I lend my new girlfriend £1,000? She's just lost her job
Esther Walker and Nirpal Dhaliwal25 Aug 2009
Esther Walker says...
Your parents will probably tell you that nothing will sour any romantic relationship more quickly than the lending or borrowing of money.
Cash always tops those Top Five lists of things that couples argue about and, most tellingly (to my mind at least), if you watch enough episodes of Judge Judy you'll know most cases are former lovers arguing over money lent and never repaid.
It ought to be so straightforward: you lend someone some money and then they pay you back. But it's almost never that simple with anyone - not with your lover, a friend or a colleague.
Individual attitudes towards money are wildly different and the trouble is you won't know exactly what crackpot ideas someone has about cash until you've lent them £150.
They could look like a perfectly normal person on the outside but then turn into that person (we all know one - maybe you ARE one) who simply won't pay you back - through forgetfulness or laziness or just sheer fecklessness.
That doesn't mean you should never lend someone money, it just has to be in the right circumstances.
If your girlfriend needs the money and you can afford to give it to her (not lend it, just give it away and not miss it) then you should do it.
If you just assume that your grand has gone for good, when she pays you back - which she probably will - it will be a nice surprise. Most important, the lending of the money will never become a cause of conflict between you.
You will get to feel like a benevolent benefactor rather than a grasping Shylock; your act of generosity will make her feel that she wants to pay you back, to return your kindness, rather than that she has to pay you back or you'll send someone round to break her legs.
If you're not in a position to wave, hypothetically, goodbye to that much cash, then don't do it, not in a million years.
There are other ways you can help your girlfriend out: cook dinner at yours rather than going out to a restaurant, suggest free things that you can both do or help her look for a new job.
She'll appreciate the effort as much as she'd appreciate a cheque and it means you'll never have a row that contains the sentence "...and you STILL owe me a grand!"
Nirpal Dhaliwal says...
If you have to ask someone else whether you should lend your recently laid-off girlfriend a grand, I think you should keep the money for a woman you have real feelings for.
You obviously aren't prepared to leap to her assistance in difficult times, and she's better off finding a man who'll immediately dig deep to help her out.
Money is always a challenge in a relationship, testing just how sure you feel about each other.
When you're head over heels in love, you think nothing of emptying your bank account and even taking on a second job just to keep a smile on your partner's face.
When a relationship doesn't have much mileage in it, you resent sharing a bag of chips with them.
I don't believe in lending your other half money. If you want your relationship to last, you should view your problems as shared ones, in which case just give her the money and never hassle her to get it back.
Settling debts can leave a foul odour over even the closest friendships, and it's best not to risk creating the same stink in your love life.
A grand might seem a large sum but it's a pittance to give to someone you care for when they're in trouble.
And should you break up, waiting for the money to be repaid will be an awkward point that could keep you involved with her for a long time afterwards.
You can take it as a given that if you don't lend her the money, she'll feel let down and will regard you as someone never to rely on in an emergency - the most basic requirement of a boyfriend.
You probably won't last long as a couple after that. So your question is really one of whether you want a future with her. If you do, sign her a cheque and be done with it.
If you don't, just break up. But don't hang around for a second longer having told her you're not going to help - she will resent you bitterly for it.
At the end of the day, it's your money to do with as you please. But I think it's always wise to err on the side of generosity.
In life, things tend to work out for the better when you're willing to place a bet on them.
Reader views (5)
True, not agreeing is indeed the point Scotty!
Maybe 'sane' wasn't the best choice of word, but I'd definitely stick with rational - and I'm not sure why you say most guys don't agree with Esther, as I haven't found that.
For the case in point: If you're willing to throw (what could be) all you're money at someone you've just met and don't actually yet know very well, then you're a better person than I am.
- John, London, 26/08/2009 14:32
Report abuse
funny isn't it john, what people call sane rational conclusions?
I'd say completely the opposite to you, and find I never agree with Esther. Most guys don't.
that's kinda the point.
- Scotty, london, 26/08/2009 12:41
Report abuse
I wouldn't say that Esther and Nirpal have totally agreed with each-other on this issue, as they've come to a similar conclusion in pretty different ways.
As usual, I find myself nodding along when reading Esther's comments, thinking that she's a perfectly sane, rational and thoughtful person - only to then read Nirpal and wonder on what planet he was raised.
- "A grand might seem a large sum but it's a pittance to give to someone you care for when they're in trouble."
Rubbish! That is entirely relative to how much you earn! If the bloke in question is a solicitor who takes home £15k a month after tax then of course it's a pittance - if he happens to stacks shelves in Tesco's for minimum wage then it's probably more than he sees in a month.
That doesn't mean a guy from Tesco's shouldn't ever do it, but to suggest it's a throwaway sum he shouldn't even think about is nonsense. What if the guy in question doesn't have the money and feels obligated to borrow it himself?
Also, I think Nirpal missed the point that it's a NEW girlfriend.
Obviously the guy would be an idiot not to help someone he'd been with for four years, (whatever his job) but if he's only been with her for four weeks however, then it's a rather different question...
- John, London, 25/08/2009 15:32
Report abuse
Nay, nay and thrice nay!
Given that men and women are supposed to be equal then a woman should be able to sort out her own financial problems. The same goes if the scenario were the other way around. It will only cause unease in the relationship.
- Paul R, London, 25/08/2009 15:23
Report abuse
Esther and Nirpal agreeing with each other takes all the fun out of this column. Get back to the normal standard, please.
I think the bloke should make the loan (rather than donation) but attach other strings in place of an interest rate. OK, so the relationship will fail and the girl friend will resent him, but at least he'll have got some fun out of it.
- Peace Maker, Battersea, 25/08/2009 10:26
Report abuse
Afternoon:
9°c


















