From unfortunate to loser in a meritocratic age - Life & Style - Evening Standard
       

From unfortunate to loser in a meritocratic age

We can feel proud of how fair working life is nowadays. In the distant past, when you saw a successful business person, you could reasonably assume that he or she attained advantage through some unfair means — by killing someone, or inheriting privilege or being in a monopoly. But we are now striving to build a society that we call "meritocratic". That is, a society where if you have something to contribute, you'll be able to get the right sort of job to fit your talents.

But this sense of justice has brought one big problem with it, for if you genuinely believe that the successful merit their success, you have to believe that the unsuccessful deserve their failure. In a meritocratic age, a sense of justice enters into the distribution of bad jobs as well as good ones. A lowly job comes to seem not merely regrettable, but also deserved. Those in the boardroom are not only wealthier than their counterparts in the post room; they could also be plain better.

The harsh attitude that a belief in meritocracy brings can be felt in language. Three hundred years ago in England, those at the bottom of society were called "unfortunates". Nowadays, they are liable to be referred to as "losers" — this harsh word suggesting a belief those who fail have only themselves to blame.

Yet let's remember that it's probably as unlikely today that you could become as rich and powerful as Bill Gates as it was unlikely in the 17th century that you could become as rich and powerful as Louis XIV of France. But the key thing is, it doesn't feel unlikely. In fact, the suggestion out there is that if you have energy and talent, if you know a few things about software, if you have a garage, you too could in a short time start a multi-billion-dollar software company.

The great cruelty behind the idea of meritocracy is that it's crazy to imagine that we'll ever build an office culture where you'll be able to rank everyone in order of goodness and reward them accordingly, the bosses being the best, the short-term cleaning staff the worst.

A wiser course might be to be inspired by the traditional Christian idea that the merit of others is, in fact, so hard to judge that only God is up to the task, and even He can only start work on the Day of Judgment with the help of a thousand angels and a large pair of scales — a crazy idea from a secular standpoint but a useful corrective to the view that you can just look at someone's CV and judge how good he or she happens
to be.

Comments

Don't Miss
Gala night for the Queen of arts - stars turn out in their hundreds to pay tribute

Happy & glorious

Stars turn out in their hundreds to pay tribute to Queen
Prints charming: patterned trousers for summer

Prints charming

Patterned trousers for summer
Promethipedia: the lowdown on Ridley Scott's new blockbuster Prometheus

Promethipedia

The lowdown on Ridley Scott's new blockbuster Prometheus
The Middletan: Kate Middleton has the most requested tan in London

The Middletan

Kate Middleton has the most requested tan in London
Amy Childs bares all like Britney

Dare to bare

Amy Childs vajazzles like Britney
Thais go Gaga: singer’s ‘fake rolex’ tweet sparks new tour row... but fans still mob her at airport

Thais go Gaga

Singer mobbed at airport
Trip the bright fantastic - in vertiginous neon

Fashion

Trip the bright fantastic - in vertiginous neon
Chelsea Champions League celebrations - in pictures

Victory parade

Chelsea Champions League celebrations
High-flying heroes

High flying heroes

David Oyelowo reveals all about new film Red Tails
The Twitter Diaries: Think Bridget Jones tries social networking

The Twitter Diaries

Think Bridget Jones tries social networking