Critics' Choice

Music

John Aizlewood

quoteAn ill-conceived Queen medley was unspeakably naff, but frankly who cares?quote

John Aizlewood Celine Dion Comedy

Bruce Dessau

quoteIt could be as irritating as nails down a blackboard yet it works as warped surrealismquote

Bruce Dessau Dina Martina Theatre

Nicholas de Jongh

quoteI soon found myself as overwhelmed by David Calder’s King Lear as any interpretation I have seen in 25 yearsquote

Nicholas de Jongh King Lear

Reader reviews

Theatre

Selwyn, Epsom

quoteWhy oh why didn't I take up the offer of leaving in the interval?quote

Gone With The Wind Music

David, London

quoteKate is a good singer, very expressive, although not a great dancerquote

The Long Blondes Music

Dave J., London

quoteThis was a masterclass in funk, soul and R&Bquote

Eric Burdon And War

Paul McCartney's £200m iTunes payday

By Robert Mendick and Jonathan Prynn, Evening Standard 07.03.08

 Add your view

 

            Paul McCartney

Golden oldie: Beatles bonanza will help Sir Paul McCartney pay his divorce deal for Heather

Look here too

Sir Paul McCartney is to release the Beatles back catalogue online - helping pay for his multi-million-pound divorce from Heather Mills.

The singles and albums will be made available on iTunes in the coming months following the final divorce hearing, due to take place at the High Court in 10 days.

Ms Mills, 40, is expected to receive between £20 million and £30 million in a cash settlement following four years of marriage to McCartney, 65.

The sale of Beatles records online will be a huge windfall for Sir Paul, Ringo Starr and the families of John Lennon and George Harrison.

Containing albums such as Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, the White Album and Help!, it will be by far the most prized music catalogue released via the internet, worth up to £200 million, according to some estimates. It is expected to dominate the download charts for many months.

This could lift Ms Mills's expectation of the divorce settlement to beyond £30 million, on the basis that Sir Paul's future income should be taken into account. It raises the prospect she could appeal if she feels the judge has not considered the online deal properly.

The catalogue's online release has been hampered by legal wrangles that have now been settled. The divorce is thought to be the final obstacle. A source close to the musician told the Evening Standard today: "I reckon the Beatles catalogue will go on this year."

In a recent interview with Billboard magazine, McCartney said: "It's all happening soon. The whole thing is primed, ready to go - there's maybe one little sticking point left and I think it's being cleared up as we speak so it shouldn't be too long."

McCartney's solo catalogue has been available for download since last May but the Beatles' recordings will be far more valuable. The bitter divorce was played out over six days behind closed doors last month. Sir Paul's legal and professional expenses alone are likely to cost about £5 million.

His lawyers are understood to have argued in court that he is worth a lot less than the £825 million that has been suggested. Ms Mills, a former model who has represented herself in court, argued he was worth much more than that.

Mr Justice Bennett's judgment on 17 March - expected to be made public at least in part - is likely to take into account McCartney's earnings during their four year marriage but also his future income, which will be hugely inflated by the deal with iTunes, owned by Apple Computers.

The download agreement followed the settling of a court case last year between Apple Corps, a company formed by the Beatles to protect its music, and Apple Computers.

A further dispute between Apple Corps and the Beatles' original record label EMI over royalty payments was also settled last year, paving the way for the download of all the Beatles' records.


More

 

 

Reader views (1)

 Add your view

Here's a sample of the latest views published. You can click view all to read all views that readers have sent in.

Please stop referring to Mills as a former model. We have seen her "modelling" pictures and she never ever modelled clothes. She should not be entitled to any of the money he earned before the marriage or any of the money he earns after the marriage. Is this the same woman who said on CNN that she would take no money if they divorced?

- Marie, NY USA


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.


 


 
 
118.com - Directory Enquiry Service for UK Businesses

118.com - Directory Enquiry Service for UK Businesses

Service
Area or postcode
 
London's Weather
Tonight
Partly Cloudy Night
14°c
Morning
Sunny
24°c
5 day forecast
 
 

Daily Mail Mail on Sunday Travel Mail This is Money Metro

Loot | Jobsite | Homes & property | London jobs | FindaProperty.com | Primelocation.com | Educate London | Holiday Villas