- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
A bittersweet christening for the boy social workers couldn't take away
Related Articles
08 December 2007
Brandon Webster was christened in front of his long-suffering parents Mark and Nicky and scores of family members, neighbours and friends in tiny St Martin's Church at Cromer, Norfolk.
The service last Sunday was a fittingly joyful symbol of the couple's High Court victory over Norfolk's social services, who wanted to take 18-month-old Brandon into care straight from birth.
But it was also a poignant reminder of the absence of their three older children, who can be identified only as Children A, B and C. They were seized by Norfolk County Council in November 2003 and forcibly adopted because of false claims of abuse.
Scroll down for more
Poignant: Nicky and Mark Webster at Brandon's christening
Mark, 34, and Nicky, 27, who fled to Ireland to stop Brandon being snatched at birth, this year mounted a successful legal challenge to Norfolk County Council's attempt to take him.
The High Court heard new expert medical opinion that tiny fractures revealed on X-rays of Child B were not caused by violent twisting and shaking, as social services believed – but were symptoms of scurvy, a now rare vitamin deficiency caused by the family GP's advice that the child should be fed on soya milk deficient in Vitamin C.
Nicky Webster with Brandon: 'It was lovely to have all our family and friends in church at Brandon's christening'
Nicky said: "We always find this time of year particularly difficult because we can't stop thinking of our other three children and what they will be doing at Christmas.
"It was lovely to have all our family and friends in church for Brandon's christening. But it was heartbreaking that our other children could not be there.
"We have no idea where they are or what they are doing – we aren't allowed to know. I like to think they are happy and settled."
The High Court case was strictly confined to Brandon. The other three children were taken after the Websters were branded child abusers in a family court hearing in 2004.
Now the couple are preparing to clear their name in the Appeal Court, which, if successful, would remove the legal basis for taking the trio.
Comments
Top stories in News
Top stories in News
-
No end to Tube nightmare as commuters warned of MORE chaos tonight
-
Double dip recession is worse than feared as UK faces ‘hurricane’
-
They attacked "like a pack" raining fists on a defenceless legal secretary. Yesterday they walked free from court. No wonder their victim says she has been denied justice.
-
British housewife facing FIRING SQUAD over Bali drugs smuggling charge was 'neighbour from hell' -
Mayor demands report from Transport for London into Jubilee Line nightmare that left hundreds of commuters trapped for hours underground
The O2
Check out the cool stuff happening under our tent such as the hottest gigs, comedy, sport, films, clubs, bars, restaurants and much more.
Can you imagine a career in teaching?
Be inspired to teach - let real teachers show you how rewarding the job can be.
Playing a game-changing role during the Games
Cisco is providing the solutions for London 2012's complex IT needs.
Win a Silverstone track day with Zantac 75
Feel the burn of a different kind - 20 Silverstone motoring experiences to be won
Reader Offers email A fantastic selection of
offers, giveaways and
promotions.
Chelsea close in on £62m swoop for Eden Hazard and Hulk
TV Baftas - in pictures
Eden Hazard: What makes the Chelsea and Arsenal target tick?
News pictures of the day
Drum'n'bass pioneer Goldie creates ‘rose’ portrait of the Queen
Video: South east London factory fire - 'Air raid siren' wakes Greenwich residents
The London best: Yoga classes
Man v Woman v Food: the big burger challenge