Tonight:
8°c
An awesome and ridiculous film that leaves you thrilled beyond the point of your natural endurance
London faces a wave of bus and Tube strikes that could cause chaos for millions of passengers as unions walkout over pay and conditions
More...
CCTV 'does not stop crime'
By Ben Leapman Home Affairs Correspondent, Evening Standard Last updated at 00:00am on 24.02.05Closed circuit TV systems are of little use in the fight against crime, a surprise government report claims today.
Home Office researchers who studied 14 schemes across Britain found that only one had brought a clear fall in the local crime rate.
While there was strong public support for CCTV before it was installed, opinion began to shift when people realised the cameras made little difference.
And researchers found that some of the schemes were botched, making them less effective. Six of the 14 control rooms were left unstaffed for part of the day or night. And in some cases, cameras could not capture clear images at night due to the glare from artificial lights.
The findings come as a blow to the Home Office, which has trumpeted CCTV as a key crime-fighting weapon for the past 10 years.
The report's author, Professor Martin Gill of the University of Leicester, said: "For supporters these findings are disappointing. For the most part CCTV did not produce reductions in crime and did not make people feel safer."
The only one of the 14 schemes found to be a success was targeted at car parks, where it led to a significant drop in vehicle crime. Other schemes in city centres, residential areas and hospitals produced no clear benefits.
Professor Gill said that because government funding was available for CCTV schemes, local officials tended to fit the cameras without any clear goal in mind.
On the plus side, only one in six people objected to CCTV on civil liberties grounds.
Reader views (2)
ofcorse they dont help prevent crimes this has been knows since they tried to put cameras in prisons so make sure prisoners would not kill one and other but instead they caught the culprit's of a murder but could not save the victim's however in the streets of London this has not changed due to CCTV people still get beaten up and raped and murders and the numbers of cameras has increaser but the numbers of solved murders and people caught for crimes have not gone up in the areas with CCTV instead demonstrations in areas with CCTV have decreed but not criminal activity so it would seem to me that huge masses of people being able to gather and protest seems to be the aim of the CCTV cameras. because i have only heard of 12 or so cases where CCTV has helped a rape victim or the family of a murder victim, or kidnappings even when they caught the whole act on tape.
- Anonyoumous, hither and dither
What if, one day, I need to protest against a corrupt government, but cannot because of the ready-made surveillance-database system that Labour are busy installing? I am far more afraid of the potential threat to my freedom and safety from a future non-benign State than I am of terrorists. I have nothing to hide, but who defines what one might need to hide in the future, as the government quietly changes our laws and erodes our rights by stealth?
- Imogen, Northampton, UK
