Morning:
18°c
Johnny Depp has become, in his young middle age, like a star of the movies’ golden period
The full story of the rescue operation was told as it emerged that plastic windows fitted at the block two years ago melted in the intense heat, effectively acting as fuel for the blaze
More...
CCTV 'does not stop crime'
By Ben Leapman Home Affairs Correspondent, Evening Standard Last updated at 00:00am on 24.02.05Closed circuit TV systems are of little use in the fight against crime, a surprise government report claims today.
Home Office researchers who studied 14 schemes across Britain found that only one had brought a clear fall in the local crime rate.
While there was strong public support for CCTV before it was installed, opinion began to shift when people realised the cameras made little difference.
And researchers found that some of the schemes were botched, making them less effective. Six of the 14 control rooms were left unstaffed for part of the day or night. And in some cases, cameras could not capture clear images at night due to the glare from artificial lights.
The findings come as a blow to the Home Office, which has trumpeted CCTV as a key crime-fighting weapon for the past 10 years.
The report's author, Professor Martin Gill of the University of Leicester, said: "For supporters these findings are disappointing. For the most part CCTV did not produce reductions in crime and did not make people feel safer."
The only one of the 14 schemes found to be a success was targeted at car parks, where it led to a significant drop in vehicle crime. Other schemes in city centres, residential areas and hospitals produced no clear benefits.
Professor Gill said that because government funding was available for CCTV schemes, local officials tended to fit the cameras without any clear goal in mind.
On the plus side, only one in six people objected to CCTV on civil liberties grounds.
Reader views (1)
Here's a sample of the latest views published.
What if, one day, I need to protest against a corrupt government, but cannot because of the ready-made surveillance-database system that Labour are busy installing? I am far more afraid of the potential threat to my freedom and safety from a future non-benign State than I am of terrorists. I have nothing to hide, but who defines what one might need to hide in the future, as the government quietly changes our laws and erodes our rights by stealth?
- Imogen, Northampton, UK
