For a chain, Gaucho is startlingly expensive, the final bill ending up pretty close to one from much more stylish, individual restaurants
Boris Johnson's deputy faces damaging new allegations that he misled the public by claiming to be a magistrate
More...
Put that Christmas light out!
By Ross Lydall Last updated at 10:43am on 09.11.06
Going green: but is the amount of energy the lights on Regent Street use still too much?
With energy-efficient lights being strung across the West End, Christmas was supposed to be going green this year.
But as Oxford Street prepares to switch on its illuminations tonight, it seems not everyone is satisfied by the environmental credentials.
The Liberal Democrats claim that a mini forest of trees would have to be planted to compensate for the carbon emissions generated by the West End's two miles of festive lights.
Despite boasts the illuminations are greener than ever, they say that the combined "carbon footprint" from the Oxford Street and Regent Street lights would take 215 trees 100 years to "offset".
Tonight's festivities on Oxford Street - continuing a tradition begun in 1959 - will see pop band All Saints perform the official switch-on at 6pm outside Selfridges.
And Jordan and Peter Andre will perform their Christmas single.
But Mike Tuffrey, Lib-Dem group leader on the London Assembly, said: "With the Oxford Street lights being switched on earlier every year and left on during the day, they are using a significant amount of energy."
He called for event organisers, the New West End Company, to do more to power the lights by renewable electricity.
He added: "They could also offset the Oxford and Regent Street lights' carbon emissions for just over £2,000 a year, a small price to pay compared to the cost of putting on the show and one worth paying to celebrate Christmas with a clear conscience."
According to the Lib-Dems, the lights in the two streets, which remain on until 6 January, will produce 43 tonnes of carbon dioxide.
But a spokesman for the New West End company said both streets were using lowenergy bulbs with 40 per cent less emissions than before.
The Oxford Street lights will remain on 24 hours a day while those in Regent Street are on between 2pm and 2am.
They are expected to help attract about 40 million shoppers over the next six weeks.
They can sponsor a bulb under the Light Up London campaign, with proceeds going to charity. Donations can be made at: www.heart-1062.co.uk/lightuplondon or from the christmas shop and food hall at Selfridges.
Reader views (14)
Here's a sample of the latest views published. You can click view all to read all views that readers have sent in.
Why is it always knee jerk numpties that post there opinions on here, the Lib Dems did not say they should be switched off, in fact they said £2000 would make it a carbon neutral event, and therefore have 0 impact on global warming. Rather than only 40% less than last year, which is not good enough. I would rather see £2000 spent on making it carbon neutral than whatever grossly inflated price they paid for Jordan and Peter Andre. It also raises the point, why are they being turned on so early and why are they being left on 24 hours a day on Oxford street.
Global warming and all this other "save the planet claptrap" is very real and very relevant now.
- Ben, Leicester
That's the reason why the Lib Dems will never win a General Election.
- Fred James, Worcester, UK
The Lib Dem's have really missed the mark here, The West End should be aplauded for using low energy lights, to create what is a wonderful spectacle enjoyed by millions whilst being environmentally concious.
Perhaps they should look closer to home for measures to save the plannet by ceasing to deliver the thousands of pointless leaflets they issue every year - how many trees would that account for Mr Tuffrey?
- Steve, Covent Garden
13°c
17°c
