Weather Tonight: 3°c Partly Cloudy Night Morning: 6°c Cloudy

News

Wind turbines 'may actually do more harm than good'

Last updated at 00:37am on 13.11.06

 Add your view

 

            Wind turbines on houses

Wind turbines: Experts doubt the true 'green' benefits of environmental fad

Home wind turbines have become the must-have home improvement among people eager to help save the planet and flaunt their green credentials.

Dubbed 'the ultimate green fashion statement', are selling in their thousands amid claims they can cut household electricity bills by 30 per cent.

But now environmental campaigners say the windmills are not quite what they claim to be - and may actually do more harm than good.

As well as being noisy and unsightly, they barely produce enough electricity to power a hairdryer in many houses.

They also do nothing to tackle greenhouses gases, while there are far better ways to cut down on energy bills.

Although there are currently just 650 home wind turbines installed that number is set to grow massively as the makers of the most popular wind turbine, Windsave, have had orders of more than 15,000 ahead of Christmas for their WS1000 unit which sells for just under £1,500 at B&Q.

Fans of wind turbines include David Cameron, who plans to install one in his west London home, Jamie Oliver, and the new science minister Malcolm Wicks.

But Friends of the Earth expert Nick Rau said there are other more practical - if less fashionable - ways of saving energy.

'A wind turbine on the roof is a glamourous statement - people want to be seen to be doing something.

'But loft or cavity wall insulation may be more effective - and will probably pay for itself a lot quicker.'

Cavity wall insulation costs around £300-£500 and can save around £150 a year in fuel bils. Wind turbines could only make a similar saving if perched on house on top of a hill in the countryside.

But turbines in towns suffer from a lack of wind - as tall buildings block the air supply. The average windspeed in Britain is 5.6 metres per second - roughly enough to generate around half a kilowatt of electricity, or enough to power a hairdryer.

This would work out at a maximum saving of £100 a year - so it would take around 15 years to pay for itself.

Wind turbines do not figure in the top ten ways to save energy in Britain.The government's Energy Saving Trust recommends 10 more energy efficient measures, such as lagging the hotwater tank, cavity wall installation, using low-energy light bulbs, drawing the curtains at night, and turning the thermostat down by one degree.

The turbines must be professionally installed and can, in some instances, result in the whole house vibrating.

Jane Vaus, of the Micropower Council, an industry body promoting small scale energy generation said: 'There is a bit of novelty value at the moment. You wouldn't say to friends ''come look at my cavity wall insulation''. But a wind turbine is much more interesting.'

Alternative energy expert Nick Martins, warns that the turbine can cause instability on some buildings.

He said 'This is not the same thing as fitting a satellite dish on the side of a house. I would guess that the lateral thrust exerted by these turbines on a Victorian chimney stack in a high wind would be more than sufficient to topple it.'

The noise generated by a Windsave turbine is 40 decibels - 'the sound of two people walking in front of your house talking' according to Paul Johnson, buying manager for B&Q.

The DIY giant said that structural surveys will reveal whether the building is strong enough to take the structure - and would never fit it to a chimney.

'We have had to turn a few people down as their roofs are not strong enough,' he said. The turbines have to have planning permission as well.

B&Q said the turbines are on sale in 107 out of their 320 shops. She said: 'Since going on sale, the biggest selling product line in value out of 43,000 items is our £1,500 wind turbine.'

Scotland has had the biggest sales so far, followed by the West Midlands, London and the Home Counties.


Bookmark and Share
 
 

Reader views (4)

 Add your view

I would ask Stef to check his/her figures for the amount of power that comes from these turbines. I would have thought 98% to be the availability of the turbine, i.e. the time it is available and ready to produce power versus the time it isn't (maintenance or breakdown). It certainly will not be producing 100% of its design capacity for 98% (or even close to that figure) of the year due to wind speed variations.

I'm not saying that wind turbines are a bad thing, just that the figures we see should not necessarily be taken as read, figures are easily manipulated to tell whatever the point of view may be. Wind turbines are a useful addition to an energy mix but must also be backed up by conventional and nuclear generating capacity for those times when the wind doesn't blow hard enough, or indeed when the wind blows too hard so the turbines must be stopped to protect them.

Good luck for your exam (though I hope it isn't in statistics!?)

Does anybody have any views on small scale Combined heat and Power (CHP) schemes?

Dave

- Dave, Swansea, UK, 07/08/2008 12:30
Report abuse

I'm doing a project for my advanced course in geography, and I'm studying windfarms and peoples opinions on them. There is a wind farm in Rothes, Scotland, near where I stay and it provides our county with around 70% of our power. Surely this is a good thing. Also, the turbines work to the best of their ability 98% of the time, in other words, 360 days every year. Such a move forward in helping to save the environment can't be a bad thing. oh, wish me luck on passing my exam next month, thanks.

- Stef, Fochabers, Scotland, 16/04/2008 20:26
Report abuse

The type of windtubines that you are talking about are Vertical Axis Wind Turbines these are also the ones you have have pictured. These turbines are not very effiecient 15 % max and have had a very low life expectancy. However a Horizontal Axis wind turbine can be up to 50% effiecient and produce more power than the average household uses. My guess is that most people don't do any research on their wind resource and just think that putting a turbine anywhere is a good idea. This is not the case you need to have an area that has a good average wind and a turbine should never be mounted on top of a house or building. You are right that a lot of energy can be saved by changing lifestyles and revamping homes but do not discredit wind energy as a whole. In a good location wind energy can produce more power than the area will use. In a bad location it won't do anything. Instead of bashing wind energy you should be encouraging people to do research and then act accordingly.

- Justin, USA, 27/09/2007 16:54
Report abuse

The solution is stop using hairdriers and save on energy; they damage your hair and lead to premature baldness. I stopped using mine 30 yrs ago.

- Dhanraj, Basildon, Essex, 27/09/2007 15:54
Report abuse


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.