Tonight:
8°c
An awesome and ridiculous film that leaves you thrilled beyond the point of your natural endurance
London faces a wave of bus and Tube strikes that could cause chaos for millions of passengers as unions walkout over pay and conditions
More...
The nursery rhyme police - parents to take lessons in reading and singing
Last updated at 00:22am on 14.11.06
Children's Minister Beverley Hughes
Parents could be forced to go to special classes to learn to sing their children nursery rhymes, a minister said.
Those who fail to read stories or sing to their youngsters threaten their children's future and the state must put them right, Children's Minister Beverley Hughes said.
Their children's well-being is at risk 'unless we act', she declared.
And Mrs Hughes said the state would train a new 'parenting workforce' to ensure parents who fail to do their duty with nursery rhymes are found and 'supported'.
The call for state intervention in the minute details of family life followed a series of Labour efforts to reduce anti-social behaviour and improve educational standards by imposing rigorous controls on the lives of the youngest children.
Mrs Hughes has established a national curriculum to set down how babies are taught to speak in childcare from the age of three months.
Her efforts have gone alongside a push by other ministers to determine exactly how parents treat their children down to how they should brush their teeth.
Tony Blair has backed the idea of 'fasbos' - efforts to identify and correct the lives of children who are likely to fail even before they are born - and new laws to compel parents to attend parenting classes are on the way.
This autumn is likely to see an extension of parenting orders that can force parents to attend parenting classes so that they can be used on the say so of local councils against parents.
For the first time, parenting orders are likely to be directed against parents whose children have committed no criminal offence.
The threat of action against parents who fail to sing nursery rhymes was unveiled by Mrs Hughes as she gave the first details of Mr Blair's 'national parenting academy', a body that will train teachers, psychologists and social workers to intervene in the lives of families and become the 'parenting workforce'.
Mrs Hughes said that it was necessary for children to develop 'emotional intelligence and flexibility, and to have good problem-solving and interpersonal skills too.'
She added: 'These attitudes start with good family experiences, in the home, with strong, loving, aspirational parents. So supporting parents and providing good early years education can pay dividends here.'
Mrs Hughes said: 'It is now clear that what parents actually do has a huge impact on children's well-being and capacity to succeed, both at the time and in future.
'Some parents already know that reading and singing nursery rhymes with their young children will get them off to a flying start - often because this is how they themselves were brought up.
'For other parents without this inheritance these simple techniques are a mystery and are likely to remain so - unless we act and draw them to their attention.'
She added: 'If friendly and skilful early years practitioners work in partnership with disadvantaged parents, as co-educators of their children, these gaps in children's development and achievement can be narrowed.'
The National Academy for Parenting Practitioner, Mrs Hughes said, would operate from next autumn to train a parenting workforce and 'support the Government's parenting agenda as it develops'.
She did not mention any figures for the cost of the scheme.
Mrs Hughes condemned the way governments before 1997 thought they had no role in the upbringing of children, which it 'regarded as the entirely private arrangements families make.'
She praised the Government's record of pouring billions into state benefits for single parents, into providing subsidies for childcare, into pushing mothers into work, and into the 'Sure Start' children's centres.
'Over the past 10 years what I have described is, I believe, an example of the enabling 21st century state in action,' Mrs Hughes said. Without Labour's policies, she said, 'we would be on the road to ruin, that is back to where we were 10 years ago.'
Mrs Hughes did not refer to independent reports on the success of Sure Start commissioned by Whitehall which say that despite £20 billion of planned spending it has been a failure in helping the most deprived children who are its target.
Critics of Government family policies condemned the 'nursery rhyme' intervention plan as intrusive and arrogant yesterday.
Jill Kirby of the centre right think tank Centre for Policy Studies said: 'This is the micro-management of family life.
'They have told us the books that our children should read and how to brush their teeth. Now they tell us what we should sing to them.
'This is what happens when a government has failed to do anything at all about the real problems of family breakdown, fatherless families and neglect of children. It is setting about wasting its time and our money.'
Anastasia de Waal of the Civitas civic values study group said: 'The problem in the real world is not that people are bad parents but that they are not parenting at all. We know that some children hardly see their parents and many don't have two parents at all.
'This is just one more worthless scheme that will have no impact at all on children's lives.'
New powers for councils to impose parenting orders are expected to be announced in the Queen's Speech tomorrow.
Part of Mr Blair's 'Respect Agenda', they extend current powers for courts to instruct parents of children who commit crimes to attend parenting classes.
Mrs Hughes' parenting workforce will include local council social workers who are likely to have the new powers.
Her speech to the National Family and Parenting Institute - an organisation set up by Labour eight years ago to further its family agenda - ignored the question of two-parent families which has begun feature in left-wing debate.
Mr Blair's Government has long declared that all families are equal. However, in recent weeks Work and Pensions Secretary John Hutton has acknowledged that children with two natural
Last week the Blairite think tank, the Institute for Public Policy Research, also acknowledged that children brought up by single parents are more likely to end up without jobs and on state benefits.
Reader views (17)
I'm in agreement with Beverley Hughes, to be honest I think it's a wonderful idea, as an early years practitioner who works with children, now I can not begin to tell you all how important rhymes and knowledge of rhyme is for your children. Not only is it a a fun way for you and your child to interact but it's an important part of your child's learning and is also a major factor in how your child's reading skills will come on from an early age. Current research suggests that by knowing rhyming words it helps children to put the sounds of letters together which can help with the reading skills and the writing skills of the child. I think what Mrs Hughes in proposing should be welcomed with open arms if only small minded people knew just how vital nursery rhymes are to a child's early education they wouldn't be quite so quick to judge someone who is trying to raise the standards of our children by helping them, who are in fact our future.
- Early Years Practitioner, Staffordshire, England
This really has gone far enough. Beverley Hughes needs to be taken aside and be forced to take 'being a sensible human being' lessons. I can't recall when I last read a more useless load of tripe than the article above. What's going to be next? How to wipe your bottom lessons? The correct/incorrect way to lick an ice cream? Opera lessons for the under 5's? How much more of our children's lives are going to be robbed? Perhaps Mrs Hughes and her childcatcher government might reflect on the fact that if they didn't insist on forcing parents who actually WANT to bring up their children into work then maybe they would actually have TIME to properly bring up their kids instead of being forced into taking part in yet another harebrained government scheme. A few generations ago people fought and died to keep our freedom intact in a horific world war and this government, quite frankly, is spitting on their graves. To say I'm disgusted would be an understatement.
- Drax, St Helens, Merseyside, UK
Beverley Hughes, what about the children who are languishing in care? Children in homes...who sings to them? Who reads their stories? What about the foster mothers with 6 children...who reads and sings to them? When are you going to clean up your constituency? My poor children were terribly neglected in your area...noone there even to wipe their tears let alone read/sing to them.
- Children's Mum, Cheshire England
If a radical socialist wants to sing his child "Joe Hill" every night, or a devout Christian wants to sing "The Lord is my Shepherd," will they face arrest if they refuse to sing "Mary Had a Little Lamb?"
- Miranda Rose Smith, Ramat Gan, Israel
Thank God the social engineers haven't taken control to such an absurd degree here in the US yet. Thank you, Britain, for demonstrating the cost of failing to take a stand for personal privacy and liberty.
- Kevin, Chicago, USA
Big Brother is pleased.
- Christopher Johnson, Reno, NV
The inmates are running the asylum.
- Tc, USA
With each and every day, I wake up in the morning and read of the latest & greatest absurdities occuring in the UK. Why not just skip all the torture and misery and confusion and just skip to the final plan that the UK authorities apparently have: Forbid all natural child breeding by natural parents and have the Government create test-tube babies and have the Government raise the babies in Government nurseries. Yeah, that will do the trick. Maybe they will all look like little Tony Blairs.
- David, Ex-Pat, Manhattan, USA
If I were to write a satirical play on the pratfalls and nannyism of the British state in modern times I couldn't top what is happening now. When will the sane reclaim their roles in this society?
- Robert, Aliso Viejo, Ca.
England has become a vast insane asylum with the in-mates running the establishment. George Orwell was wrong only on the date. If we are not very careful, the United States will follow in England's wobbly footsteps.
- Reis Kash, Springfield, Oregon, U.S.A.
This is what comes of not having whole school assemlies. Kids have lost the art of belting out a good tune. The hymns were always incomprehensible anyway; it didn't matter what the words meant; it was just the sheer joy of airing yor lungs at that time of the morning.
- Dhanraj, Basildon, Essex
I was in Sussex last week. My hairdresser told me that her daughter came home saying she had learnt Nursery Rhymes at school that day.
" Ba ba Rainbow sheep, have you any wool" When she remonstrated with her daughter the little girl said that this was stated by the Teacher.
No wonder there is so much suppressed hate around with dimwiited decisions such as this. And what does it do to the children?
- Minnie Ovens, London, UK
What a stupid government proposal. Job justification springs to mind. I know a single mother with three children, the house is a grimey pit and one of her children would already qualify for this FASBO thing. What do the social workers do? They just give her more money and threaten to take her children away every so often until another family member has gone in and cleaned up the place. It's a cyclical nightmare of neglect and manufactured excuses. How about we teach single mums to cook and clean first and foremost? Afterall, singing a nursery rhyme to a child who is hyperactive from a junk food diet doesn't really have the best effect and people that already feed their children properly no doubt already teach them these rhymes.
- Isabel, Woking, England
Previously `failed' Minister, Beverley Hughes, has got it wrong yet again. She states the obvious as if she has discovered the Holy Grail of parenting, but she completely overlooks the fact that too many parents are not kindly disposed to sing or read to their children despite her humbug-loaded pronouncements.
I suppose we must all now look forward to New Labour framing a rebel-free Law or two on the matter in due course.
- Ted, Shetland
Helping people out of poverty is probably more effective than this nanny-state social engineering. Those from single parent families or disadvantaged backgrounds who live on sink-estates riddled with crime, drugs and violence are likely to emulate the society they see around them in order to 'conform' and survive.
- Brian, Bromley
Nanny state or Communist state?
- Nick, Bedford
I'm surprised there are no comments attached to this, attacking it as 'nanny state' etc.
I would never advocate enforcement of this , but I must say, proper parenting includes bedtime stories and nursery rhymes. Its a good foundation for reading and verbal communication. It worked for my kids, and they continue to have an interest in their own education. Promote it, don't forcefeed it.
- Andrew, Dublin
