Morning:
11°c
It’s Day’s night, and no one is going to spoil her story
The Evening Standard demands an end to the practice of burying children and babies in mass paupers’ graves
More...
Now a school bans 13-year-old from wearing crucifix
Last updated at 12:07pm on 13.01.07
Samantha Devine, who was forbidden to wear her crucifix
A school provoked fury last night by ordering a devout Catholic schoolgirl to remove her cross necklace because it posed a health and safety risk.
Teachers demanded Samantha Devine remove her chain and tiny crucifix despite allowing Muslim and Sikh pupils to wear symbols of their religion.
Her family have vowed to fight the decision "all the way" claiming it discriminates against Christians.
The case mirrors the row which engulfed British Airways and forced the airline into an embarrassing climbdown after it threatened to sack an employee who insisted on wearing her cross at work.
In the latest clash, 13-year-old Samantha was left in tears after her form teacher told her she must remove her tiny half-inch crucifix and chain.
But her furious family yesterday pointed out the school - Robert Napier in Gillingham, Kent - allows Muslim pupils to wear headscarves and Sikh students to come to lessons with turbans and bangles.
Samantha even claims staff routinely fail to crack down on youngsters wearing non-religious jewellery, including large necklaces and earrings.
Her parents are concerned she is being singled out because she is a Christian. The youngster last night vowed to continue wearing her necklace to school - even if it means being expelled.
Her stand now threatens to spark similar confrontations in schools up and down the country.
The vast majority of schools ban jewellery as part of their uniform policies and head teachers' leaders remained defiant last night, declaring all neck chains - regardless of whether they are religious - must stay banned for health and safety reasons.
The schoolgirl's father, who served as a soldier in the Royal Irish Regiment for 11 years including tours in Kosovo and Sierra Leone, vowed to sue the school if it insists on barring his daughter from wearing her necklace - which he gave her as a present a month ago.
She intends to proudly wear her chain when she returns on Monday to her secondary modern school, described as "satisfactory" by Ofsted.
Mr Devine, who attends St Thomas Of Canterbury Catholic Church in Gillingham every Sunday, insisted: "It's just political correctness gone absolutely mad.
"It's a harmless, very small crucifix and she wears it as a symbol of her religion."
Samantha was asked to remove her necklace in front of sniggering classmates as she left the morning registration session on Wednesday morning.
The necklace was just visible underneath her open-necked blouse, worn with a blazer in accordance with the school's dress code.
The Devines were told she should remove her chain because it breached health and safety rules.
But Mr Devine said: "I have seen other religous pupils at the school who are not part of the Christian fath, but they are allowed to wear their religious garments and symbols without being questioned.
"So why should my daughter be told to remove a cross which means a lot to her from around her neck?"
"People in this country are too scared to say anything against other faiths because they don't want to be accused of discrimination. But it's acceptable to discriminate against Catholics.
"We are British and should be allowed to wear it in our own country.
"I respect every religion, but my daughter is just wearing a crucifix to protect her. It makes me wonder why I protected my country when we can't even protect my religious beliefs. This has upset the the entire family."
The school, which has no religious ties, said it would allow Samantha to wear a cross as a lapel badge.
But Mr Devine said it would not make such a request to pupils from other religions.
He said there were Sikh pupils at the school who wore turbans. The school said in a statement it would consider waiving its jewellery rule - regardless of health and safety concerns - for "essential requirements"
He claims another teacher at Samantha's school backed her right to wear the cross and encouraged her to continue doing so.
Samantha herself said: "I am proud of my religion and it is my right to wear a cross around my neck.
"I can't understand why the school thinks a tiny crucifix on a thin silver necklace is a health and safety hazard."
The 13-year-old, who wants to be a vet and has been getting A and B grades in her exams, added: "Other religions can show their beliefs by wearing bracelets or turbans, so why can I not wear a cross to show my devotion to God?
"I felt really upset and shocked when the teacher told me take off my necklace and crucifix.
"I am determined to keep wearing the crucifix whatever the consequences - even if I get suspended or expelled."
Her mother, Rosemary, 38, has two other children, Christopher, 16, and Louise, 14, neither of whom attend the school.
She said: "Although no one has actually said she will be suspended or disciplined for wearing the crucifix, Samantha is very worried and concerned about the repercussion of her decision.
"She has been made fully aware that she is breaking a school rule, but Danny and myself have told her to stand up for what she believes in. "If it all comes to a head, I don't want to even think about removing her from the school because she has until now, got on so well, but we will not back down.
"Samantha is proud of who she is and we will fight this all the way."
Paul Jackson, the school's deputy headteacher, said: "The school has a policy of no jewellery to be worn by any students in years seven to ten. All parents and students are aware of this.
"In this particular instance, the student and parent were informed that wearing the chain was a health and safety hazard, but that we would allow a lapel badge to be worn.
"The only exception to our uniform rule we would consider making is if the jewellery were an essential requirement of a particular religion.
"We have no reason to believe this to be the case in this instance."
The case has striking parallels with the row late last year over BA's decision to take disciplinary action against Christian check-in worker Nadia Eweida.
Following a barrage of criticism from Church leaders and politicans across the spectrum, the airline announced a shake-up of its uniform policy to allow symbols of faith to be worn openly.
A spokesman for the Department for Education said: "Uniforms and dress codes are a matter for individual schools."
Reader views (8)
I think it would be better if you had one law for all. For instance if they allow a girl to wear a necklace then the rest of the girls can, no matter if it has religous meaning or not. i think you sjould be able to express yourself at school i mean i thought thats what schools are for. Today is to PC and needs to stop as it is getting silly.
- Jacob Davies, Spalding, England
I am a catholic. I wear a crucifx all the time. I am a Police Officer and I have got into a fair few violent situations. I can say that my crucifix has never caused a problem so why do schools ban it? You can hardly say that a pupil's school life is as dangerous as mine!
I can understand that this child wants to wear her crucifix. It is not about showing others her faith but a personal confirmation of her own beliefs. I think schools need to think carefully about any decisions they make and apply just a little common sense.
- Declined, London
Still I don't understand the need of showing other people your own religion. If she's attached to that cross, couldn't she just hang it on a longer chain and wear it under her shirt, near her heart?
- Henry, UK
One would assume that with all these stories and publicity regarding the wearing of religious symbols, that all would be sweetness and light in our God fearing land; but all I see and hear is argument and conflict - aren't we truly a nation of gratuitous hypocrites?
- Ted, Shetland
Has anyone actually asked WHY wearing a short chain and crucifix poses a "health and safety risk" in the first place? I mean, it's not as if she is operating machinery in a factory. Then, the school says she can wear a lapel badge; this involves a pin - surely that is a H&S risk!
- David, London, United Kingdom
Would wearing a cross/crucifix as a lapel badge -- which it appears the school would allow -- provide the same sort of religious "protection" as wearing a crucifix on a chain around the neck? If so, perhaps that is the simplest solution?
- Richard Hancock, Bracknell, Berkshire
Remember this when you cast your votes next time, this pc madness has to stop.
- Chris Rosby, Belford, England
This is pure, insane silliness. I hope the young lady continues to stand up for her beliefs, and that her family continues to support her. I myself am a member of another religion, but I stand by the statement that supports freedom of expression: "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Has the world gone completely mad?
- Mai, Seattle, USA
