'Safest ever' passport is not fit for purpose
Last updated at 10:07am on 05.03.07
Unfit for purpose: In just four hours, the Mail hacked into a new passport
They are the "safest ever", according to the Government. But the Daily Mail has revealed how easily a person's identity can be stolen from new biometric passports.
In just four hours, the Mail hacked into a new biometric passport and stole the details a people trafficker or illegal migrant would need to set up a life in Britain.
More here:
• Children ages 11 to have prints stored
A shocking security gap allows the personal details and photograph in any electronic passport to be copied from the outside of the envelope in which it is delivered to homes.
The passport holder is none the wiser when it arrives because the white envelope has not been tampered with or opened.
Using a simple gadget built from parts bought on the Internet, it took the Mail less than four hours to copy the details from one passport.
It had been delivered in the normal way by national courier company Secure Mail Services to a young woman in Islington, North London.
With her permission we took away the envelope containing her passport and never opened it.
By the end of the afternoon, we had stolen enough information from the passport's electronic chip - including the woman's photograph - to be able to clone an identical document if we had wished.
More significantly, we had the details which would allow a fraudster, people trafficker or illegal immigrant to set up a new life in Britain.
The criminal could open a bank account, claim state benefits and undertake a myriad financial and legal transactions in someone else's name.
This revelation will prove a major embarrassment to ministers. Since their introduction a year ago, more than four million biometric travel documents have been delivered by courier.
The Government believes this is the safest way of sending out passports. But this may be an illusion.
The passports are dispatched in white envelopes which are easily recognisable from the distinctive lettering and figures on the outside.
There is no identity check on the person signing for the passport when it arrives. In multi-occupancy flats they can be handed to anyone at the address. Thousands have already gone missing.
We began our investigation by asking Elizabeth Wood, a 33-year old web designer, to apply for a new biometric passport.
She telephoned the Identity and Passport Service on Monday, February 12.
Because she wanted the passport quickly, she was asked to go to the IPS office in Victoria, Central London, the following afternoon.
If she had not requested the fasttrack service, the passport would normally have been sent out without a face-to-face interview.
The next day Miss Wood met an official for ten minutes. The details on her application form were verified using two forms of ID - normally a household bill and a bank statement. Her photograph was also examined.
Miss Wood paid £91 for the fasttrack delivery and was told her passport would be sent to her home by secure courier in exactly seven days.
In fact, it took just four days, arriving when Miss Wood was in the shower. Her boyfriend went to the door and signed for the document. He was able to do so without showing any form of identity to the courier, who did not ask for Miss Wood.
But there is another gaping hole in security. At first glance the new biometric passport looks much like the traditional one.
The only clue on the outside of the document that it contains an electronic chip is a small gold square on the front.
Inside the passport there is a laminated page containing the holder's picture, passport number, name, nationality, sex, signature, date and place of birth and the document's issue and expiry date.
At the bottom of this page are two lines of printed numbers and letters which can be read by a computer when the passport is swiped through a special machine by immigration officials. It is called the Machine Readable Zone.
On the back of the page is a tiny computer chip, surrounded by a coil of copper-coloured wire. This is a Radio Frequency Identification microchip, which can be read using radio waves.
Encoded on the passport's RFID chip are three important files. One contains an electronic copy of the printed information on the passport's photo page; the second holds the electronic image of the holder's photo. The third is a security device which checks that the previous two files are not accessed and altered.
In order to get into the files, the computer needs an "electronic key". This is the 24-digit code printed on the bottom line of the passport's Machine Readable Zone. It is called the "MRZ key number".
When an immigration official checks the passport by swiping it through his machine, it reveals the key which is then used to open up the electronic data on the microchip.
The official checks that the photograph and information printed on the passport match the details on the chip and the holder is allowed to pass in, or out, of the country.
The Government says the biometric chips are protected by "an advanced digital encryption technique". In other words, without the MRZ key code it is impossible to steal the passport holder's details if you do not have their travel document.
Yet it took us no time at all to unravel the crucial code, using a relatively simple computer software programme and a scanning device.
The Mail was helped by computer security consultant Adam Laurie, who advises public bodies and private companies on combating IT fraud. He discovered glaring weaknesses in the biometric passport's security system.
The first flaw is that a hacker can try to access the chip as many times as he likes until he cracks the MRZ code. This is different to putting a pin number into a bank machine, where the security system refuses access after three wrong combinations are entered.
The second is that there are easily identifiable recurring patterns in the MRZ key codes issued. For example, the passport holder's date of birth always features, as does the passport's expiry date, which is ten years after the issue date.
The Mail is not publishing full details of Miss Wood's passport to protect her. We know exactly how Mr Laurie cracked the MRZ code but we are not going to reveal the process for security reasons.
Crucially, he only needed one new piece of information - Miss Wood's date of birth.
In under two hours, the Mail had found this by checking the electoral roll, birth records and looking at genealogical sites on the Internet.
Miss Wood's photo page soon popped up on Mr Laurie's laptop screen. He had not needed to see her actual passport - the white envelope containing it remained unopened on the desk.
Crucially, some banks, including the Post Office, no longer require to see a full passport as proof of identity from a new customer opening an account. They ask for a photocopy of the photo page to be sent in the post instead.
Miss Wood's photo page could easily be copied and used for this purpose. Mr Laurie said: "I used public information and equipment that is legal. The software took me three days to write. It is incredibly easy to thieve data from the passports. It could be put onto another chip and implanted in a blank passport."
Phil Booth, national co-ordinator of NO2ID, a group pressing the Government to abandon plans for identity cards, witnessed our experiment.
"This shows how easy it is to steal a person's identity from the new passport without the innocent owner even knowing," he said.
"The Government has repeatedly said this information is secure. You have just shown that it is not."
Last night a Home Office spokesman said: "We do not believe it would be possible to successfully forge a new passport by doing this.
"The security around the UK passport chip prevents anyone changing or deleting any of the data or information on the chip, which is what is required to successfully forge a passport."
Reader views (16)
There are are loads of reasons for worry here. Besides the over-expenditure on such a process, this can also increase the number of ID frauds and many other related crimes. I would be surprised, if such a facility is launched by the British Government without any "Ethical Hacking" performed first hand!
- Manoj Kuruvanthody, Pune, India, 09/03/2007 04:20
Report abuse
As if this is not bad enough, one can certainly imagine a sophisticated terrorist using ID "sniffing" to scan for British and American passports among captives in any sort of situation you can imagine. Are we simpling enabling this by adding RFID? This is not a solely Brit problem, but a world wide one.
- Ken Sexton, Salem, Oregon USA, 06/03/2007 22:20
Report abuse
RFID passport systems are not built to provide security.
Don't believe the hype.
The best minds in security have decried RFID based security access devices for years.
RFID based systems are designed to provide the “appearance” of security.
Like the security screening devices used in airports. They provide the perception of security, despite the ease with which those systems can be circumvented.
But let's look at the basics. Is an RFID system any more secure than the traditional paper based system?
No!
It cost millions if not billions of pounds/dollars/euros, and, in my opinion makes us more insecure.
As this article shows, it eases the ability to steal the passport user's identity.
These devices are exceedingly easy to forge.
It allows un-trained officials to place arbitrary trust in a fundamentally untrustworthy system.
These systems cost a fortune!
Why, then, would an organization seek to implement such a system?
The same reason Microsoft advertises that has made significant headway in it's security, despite the research.
These organizations have a vested interest in showing that they are doing “something” even if “something” is really a code word for “nothing”.
- Bill Gross, Washington DC, USA, 05/03/2007 15:33
Report abuse
This is a technological blunder that might be fixed.
But the fundamental truth that the government refuses to acknowlege is that any database accessible to tens of thousands of civil servants will be an open book to organised crime. It only takes one corrupted civil servant to make it so. So it will help, not hinder, criminal activities.
So what is it for? Not for our benefit, but for that of the government, and even more so for the benefit of a future police state dictatorship. Which, I fear, is the direction in which the UK is headed, and at an alarming rate.
The ID database needs to be stopped, and the Tories have promised to do so. This alone guarantees them my vote at the next election, even if on every other issue I disagree with them.
- Nigel, London, 05/03/2007 14:02
Report abuse
The more this Government rants on about how secure the new passport is, the more banks and other institutions will take it as a given that someone with a new passport is who they say they are. Banks will make bigger loans, social security will make less alternative checks, passport control will pass through the holder more quickly. Now that it has been revealed that the new passports are totally insecure, the whole electronic passport process is totally counter-productive. More reliance based on an unreliant process. The London School of Economics has estimated the cost of identity cards at about £20billion. Since identity cards are intended to use the same technology as the passports, what earthly good can come from identity cards? Criminals will be producing them left and right, and fraudulent holders will be able to get away with even more than is now possible.
- Phil Jones, London, 05/03/2007 13:27
Report abuse
The Home Office say: ""We do not believe it would be possible to successfully forge a new passport by doing this" - well who cares what they believe? I expect they didn't believe last week that hackers could read all the information off the chip either.
- Tim, London, 05/03/2007 13:13
Report abuse
It ceases to amaze me that in an era of rapid economic and technological development we are still making mistakes and spending little or no time looking at developing or even using a technology that is proven to work. It is no wonder that ID Thieves are choosing the UK as a prime target!
- Stephen Hill, London, UK, 05/03/2007 12:53
Report abuse
Now why doesn't this surprise me!
- Andy W, London, 05/03/2007 12:48
Report abuse
If this isn't an eloquent argument against wasting billions of pounds on public money on technology that's just not needed for a national identity card, I don't know what is. Hackers will ALWAYS catch up with programmers, so it's ordinary people who lose out from all sides.
- Jonny, London, 05/03/2007 12:11
Report abuse
And isn't this the same chip that's only guaranteed for 2 years even though it's going in 10 year passports?
- Rachel, London, 05/03/2007 11:59
Report abuse
This government can not organize anything and Labour is quite dangerous. What do they do with all their rich tax money?
- Georgie, London, 05/03/2007 11:40
Report abuse
I have just renewed my passport. Having read the literature which states that I would have to sign for the renewed passport, it took me by surprise to find that it was sitting on the mat when I got home from work. So much for secure delivery!
- Kathy, Orpington, 05/03/2007 11:16
Report abuse
I may be incorrect but were the government not planning to use roughly the same technology for ID cards? Sounds like a genius plan doesn't it?
- Lloyd, London, 05/03/2007 11:03
Report abuse
This is truly TERRIFYING news, but will the government take any notice? How dire will the situation have to become before the government takes any action? This is extremely frightening, and a terrible omen for the much-touted ID cards.
- Freddie, London, 05/03/2007 10:32
Report abuse
This government is treating the biometric passports as the panacea to solve all crime and other ills in society. They are blindly igoring advice from experts who tell them that it will not make a jot of difference. More importantly they are ignoring the electorate who don't want to live under a STASI regime.
- Paul, Harlow, UK, 05/03/2007 09:05
Report abuse
Biometric passports will encourage fraudsters to use fakes of these passports as IDs where there is no reading equipment.
In other words just like equipment dependent biometric ID cards these biometric passports will boost identity fraud.
Identity fraud will continue to grow because we rely on signatures despite of knowing that in the event of crime they would not even expose person's gender.
To make signature reliable we should apply ID sticker (small sticker with persons photo and name printed on it) to the document and countersign.
None of these biometric ID systems make signatures we rely on to conclude transactions reliable and hence the claim that they will combat identity fraud is wrong.
- Yogesh Raja, Aylesbury, 05/03/2007 02:50
Report abuse
Morning:
5°c





