Weather Tonight: 3°c Partly Cloudy Night Morning: 6°c Cloudy

News

Blair wants EU to take on British foreign affairs, says German ambassador

Last updated at 23:22pm on 06.03.07

 Add your view

 

            Tony Blair

Blair backs a plan to create a new EU foreign minster, according to Wolfgang Ischinger

Tony Blair is set to back plans for a powerful new EU foreign minister to represent Britain's interests abroad, it has been claimed.

A senior German official said it was time for Europe to "get its act together" by agreeing to create the massively influential post that would effectively limit the powers of national foreign ministers.

His comments will fuel fears that Germany is trying to revive the discredited EU constitution by the back door during its six months presidency of the EU.

And it is sure to be opposed by Tory leader David Cameron, who spoke out in Brussels against further centralisation of EU powers and the prospect of introducing key elements of the constitution - such as the common foreign minister plan - without the democratic support of voters.

Germany's ambassador to the UK, Wolfgang Ischinger, spoke warmly of the idea of an EU foreign affairs supremo, a role that would go to a full-time unelected Brussels figure who would strut the world stage at taxpayers' expense to present a "harmonised" foreign policy on behalf of the 27-member club.

Mr Ischinger confidently expressed his belief that Mr Blair secretly supports the plan - which critics warn is a major step towards a European superstate.

He claimed that other world powers could not "understand" why the EU had so many representatives on foreign affairs.

And he called for Javier Solana, the EU's current "High Representative" on foreign affairs, to be put in charge of European foreign policy as a formal foreign minister.

The EU was forced to ditch the foreign minister plan last year after the French and Dutch refused to back the blueprint, but European leaders are plotting to bring it back in some form.

Mr Ischinger told journalists in London: "Like a group of lobbyists, we are an incredibly diverse group of people and no-one in Washington has ever understood why there needs to be a President of the Commission, and a Commissioner, and then comes the higher representative for foreign policy, Mr (Javier ) Solana and then comes the Presidency...and it is very confusing for non-EU people.

"Why can't we get our act together and have a European foreign minister who can travel to Malaysia, or Washington, or some other country and say this is what the EU believes."

When asked whether the German Chancellor Angela Merkel also backs the idea of a single EU foreign minister, he added: "Absolutely. Sure. And I think the British Government thinks the same thing.

"We should do what is long overdue, namely to make sure that Mr Solana or whoever may at some point succeed him to give him a double hat and keep his current mandate so that there is one person who represents foreign policy.

"That would make the European Union look a lot more credible and effective in dealing with foreign governments and institutions."

He went on to call for a "permanent, professional" presidency, branding the current system - where the EU presidency rotates every six months - as "almost ridiculous".

The German ambassador said: "It would be as if in a company you throw a dice and ask for some members of the supervisory board who shows up twice a year to run the company and that is not a very good way of doing it.

"It is, particularly, incredibly hard for the small countries that may not have had a chance ever before to do this and all of a sudden you are asked to run a business of 500 million people for six months. It is almost ridiculous."

Mr Blair's spokesman refused to comment on Mr Ischinger's comments, which come only days before EU leaders meet in Brussels to discuss global warming.

He said: "In terms of our position on the constitution that is a matter that doesn't arise until June. This week's summit is about energy. Let's not get ahead of ourselves."

Mr Ischinger's remarks came as Tory leader David Cameron denounced any attempt to revive elements of the European Constitution and declared that any further centralisation of EU affairs would be "profoundly wrong".

In his first major speech on Europe since he became Tory leader, Mr Cameron said "there is no case for the constitution or a constitution lite".

Mr Cameron was adamant that any moves to give Europe greater powers over foreign and defence policy should be resisted.

"International security is ultimately a task for states, and for bodies such as NATO which have military resources at their command," he said. "I do not believe that the EU should acquire additional powers to control policy in this area."

He added that Europe must stop obsessing about institutional structures. He said: "Instead of looking outwards to the world, the EU is looking inwards, at itself. Seeking new "competences". Creating new posts. Attempting to breathe new life into a Constitution which was rejected by French and Dutch voters, and for which there is scant enthusiasm among the people of Europe.

"I believe they are profoundly wrong. In the globalised age, we need more flexibility, not more centralisation."

He was speaking at the the first conference of the Movement for European Reform (MER), which Mr Cameron launched last year with the Tory's sister party in the Czech Republic, the ODS.

He said he wanted to see a "3G Europe" - concentrating on globalisation, global warming and global poverty.

Mr Cameron said the MER was setting up an independent "European Reform Commission" - and one of its jobs would be to review the range of EU powers and see how they could be made "reversible".

The Tory leader was speaking to a Brussels audience of politicians and business leaders from 18 political parties and 17 different countries.

"The European Union needs to change if it is to be fit for the challenges of the new century, not stuck haggling over the debris of the last" he said.

"There is no case for the Constitution, or Constitution-lite.

"Change should open the EU up, so that it can prosper in the new world that is being created. That means putting an end to the sense that Brussels is a ratchet, accruing more and more powers to itself at the expense of national or local governments."

EU leaders had signed a declaration in 2001 including a pledge on "restoring tasks to the member states", pointed out Mr Cameron. But nothing had been done.

Now one of the jobs of the new European Reform Commission would be to see if the current body of EU law could be made reversible.


Bookmark and Share
 
 

Reader views (8)

 Add your view

These people won't stop until they create a world goverment and to think we pay them to sit around all day having 'meetings' and thinking up new ways to create more bureaucracy and jobs for The Kinnocks.

- Frank, London, 07/03/2007 15:43
Report abuse

Unfortunately, this measure comes a good few years to late — what we needed was someone to overrule Blair's own foreign policy while he was still a potent political force...

- Jonny, London, 07/03/2007 15:13
Report abuse

Prime Minister Blair does not have and never did have a mandate from the British public to cede any sovereignty to the EU. This latest would appear to be the latest of this man of the nation he is supposed to protect and lead.

- S. Chisholm, UK, 07/03/2007 14:17
Report abuse

The real problem is shown by the remarks of the German Ambassador when he says "it's as if a member of the supervisory board who turns up twice a year..."

In the UK, companies don't have supervisory boards. They have a unitary executive board that governs/directs on a regular basis. If he thinks that our elected British Government is some sort of supervisory board then he clearly sees the EU as the executive board. This is clearly not how UK subjects see things. We see our UK governemnt as elected to run things, with or without the permission of the German Ambassador. I suggest that the ambassador get in his AUDI and go home.

- Mark, London, 07/03/2007 14:09
Report abuse

Is Bliar just amassing his powers for his next job?!

- Stuart W, London, 07/03/2007 12:34
Report abuse

It would be another disgraceful step in the undermining of our national democratic sovereignty for our diplomatic representation to be hived off to an EU foreign minister.

Anyone speaking on behalf of Britain should be under the control of a democratically elected British Government. An EU foreign minister would be accountable to the unelected Commission.

There is also no way one foreign policy agenda can be chosen for the whole EU which actually represents Britain's interests and aims. The French and Italians, for example, are opposed to extending free trade with countries outside the EU, whereas Britain and especially the City is a place that has always traded globally.

The EU's history is one of ignoring the people and forcing artificial and unsuccessful one size fits all policies on a very varied continent. To do this with foreign policy and diplomacy would be an unjust disaster.

- Mark Wallace, Better Off Out Campaign, London, UK, 07/03/2007 12:14
Report abuse

Presumably this person will have to have all decisions he makes ratified by the White House as we don't want to upset "our special friend".

- Lloyd, London, 07/03/2007 10:44
Report abuse

The government have for a number of years been closing down embassies and consulates throughout the world. This means that British interests are no longer being represented at the grass-roots level
with consequent loss of intelligence and commericial information.

I have suggested to various officials that we should look at the possiblity of having European embassies in countries where we are no longer fully represented and that an arrangement to share information is arrived at.

Currently our Central and South American embassies are below par and the incursion of the Chinese has left both ourselves and the Americans wrong footed in this very important hemi-sphere.

HMG should broaden its remit beyond a purely Euro-foreign affairs minister but take up my suggestion in full.

There is a need for Europe to project power as a unified body since it is obvious that no one country has the resources to go it alone.

- Michael De Ruyter, UK, 07/03/2007 01:59
Report abuse


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.