Morning:
8°c
With a single dessert and just two glasses of wine our bill was kept in check - but the effort of doing so was not much fun
Latest: Gordon Brown apologises for his poor handwriting and for misspelling the name of a dead soldier in a letter to the young man’s mother
More...
Boys do better than girls when taught under traditional reading methods
Last updated at 21:07pm on 21.03.07
Boys can learn to beat girls at reading if they are given old-fashioned teaching methods, claim psychologists
Boys can learn to beat girls at reading if they are given old-fashioned teaching methods, claim psychologists.
The use of more traditional phonetics-based lessons helps boys catch up with girls - even doing better on some tests - and prevents some children from needing 'special' schooling, according to new research findings.
A study of synthetic phonics also found children from disadvantaged backgrounds do as well as those from better off homes.
The research, presented at the British Psychological Society's annual conference in York, has underpinned changes being made in the nation's classrooms.
They have been introduced after damning revelations that four in 10 children have failed to master the three Rs by the time they leave primary school.
There has also been concern about the growing gender divide in achievement, starting in primary schools.
Under the synthetic phonics system, children are taught the sounds that make up words rather than guess at entire words from pictures and story context.
Rhona Johnston, a professor of psychology at Hull University, and Dr Joyce Watson of St Andrews University, studied the results from 300 children originally given training using synthetic phonics when they were five.
The progress of the group at primary schools in Clackmannanshire was compared with 237 children using the more usual analytic phonics approach.
Boys taught using synthetic phonics were able to read words significantly better than girls at the age of seven, with all pupils ahead of the standard for their age.
Boys were 20 months ahead while girls were 14 months more advanced than expected.
At the end of the study, boys' reading comprehension was as good as that of the girls, but their word reading and spelling was better.
Children from disadvantaged areas who received synthetic phonics training kept up with children from well off areas until the seventh year at school, whereas those taught with usual methods fell behind five years earlier.
Prof Johnston said: "The results of this long term study continued to show benefits to children of using this particular technique of teaching.
"All children can get the most out of learning to read using synthetic phonics.
"We found children were performing well who might otherwise have ended up in special teaching arrangements," she added.
"Teachers told us they had fewer disciplinary problems and less trouble in the playground because boys were succeeding and had higher self esteem."
Professor Johnston's work has been influential in persuading the Government to re-write its national literacy hour - returning to a system that dates back to Victorian times.
Synthetic phonics fell out of favour in the 1960s and 1970s in favour of progressive 'child-centred' learning that was championed for decades by educationalists in the Labour movement.
Some primary schools have already introduced the system and the remainder are expected to do so this autumn, said Professor Johnston.
Reader views (5)
i think girls do better than boys because we mature faster duhhhhhh
we are always going to be the best....
- Rebecca, barbados
With twin boys that have had speech issues, not teaching them the basics of decoding and phonetics has left them repeatedly below grade level even with extra help. Absolutely no surprises here, just an up hill battle to get it changed.
- S Leadbetter, Canada
Is there any other way to teach reading successfully? This is the first step and the rest of the strategies are rainbows to choose from. There is not just one way of teaching reading. Marry the methods and allow the students to find the colour to match their learning style.
- Alison Moya, Ohio, USA
As 'Naomi' writes, using phonics is a traditional method of learning to read. What is different in "synthetic phonics' is that enormous sums of money must be expended to introduce a particular system, not much better or worse than many systems already in use. Many indivuals have made huge profits as the result of a skilful publicity and lobbying campaign.
- Léo Burton, Trédarzec France
No real surprises there then. At my primary school this was how we were taught to read. I don't remember there being ANYONE at my school who was unable to read, and read well. One thing the headmaster did, as a yearly ritual, was to personally assess the reading age of every child in his school. He had a table set up for this purpose on the school stage, with a book having lists of increasingly difficult words in it. Each pupil was thence assigned a reading age. The traditional methods worked then, as they will still do now.
- Naomi, Manchester
