Morning:
8°c
With a single dessert and just two glasses of wine our bill was kept in check - but the effort of doing so was not much fun
Latest: Gordon Brown apologises for his poor handwriting and for misspelling the name of a dead soldier in a letter to the young man’s mother
More...
Queen could be forced to give evidence at Diana inquest
Last updated at 22:52pm on 15.05.07
Conversation claim: The Queen allegedly spoke to Paul Burrell
Mohamed Al Fayed wants the Queen to be questioned as part of the Princess Diana inquest, it has emerged.
The Harrods owner has already demanded that Prince Charles and Prince Philip give evidence to the full inquest, which starts in October.
Now he wants the Queen to be "directly approached" and questioned over her private conversations with Diana's butler, Paul Burrell.
Mr Al Fayed, whose son Dodi died alongside the princess in the Paris car crash in 1997, believes they were murdered in an establishment conspiracy.
His lawyers made their request in the High Court, in the final preliminary hearing with Baroness Butler-Sloss as coroner.
In 2002, evidence from the monarch helped clear Mr Burrell of the theft of scores of the princess's personal treasures.
While he was on trial at the Old Bailey, the Queen remembered a conversation they had a few weeks after the crash, in which he told her he had taken some papers for safekeeping.
She confided in Prince Charles, who informed the police, and the trial collapsed. Mr Burrell subsequently claimed the Queen had told him: "There are powers at work in this country about which we have no knowledge."
The Al Fayed legal team received 11,000 pages of evidence last week from Lord Stevens's Operation Paget inquiry into the deaths.
But Mr Al Fayed's barrister Michael Mansfield QC told the coroner that any references to Mr Burrell and "any conversations with Her Majesty in various statements" had been edited.
Scroll down for more
Mohamed al Fayed has fought a long battle over the inquest of his son, Dodi, and Diana, Princess of Wales
He said: "No one appears to have approached Her Majesty about the contents of these conversations.
"The inquiries which we suggest should be made...is Her Majesty being directly approached to see if there was evidence of conversations as alleged by Mr Burrell."
Baroness Butler-Sloss said she had ordered all references to the Queen to be blacked out. She told the hearing: "So far as Her Majesty is concerned I don't know what the protocol is and I think that it is important that whatever the protocol may be should be observed.
"Therefore I have redacted the conversation that Her Majesty is supposed to have said.
Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss: Resigned saying she lacked experience
"Her Majesty to be approached - I think that is probably unheard of.
"I think we have to tread very carefully in relation to the sovereign because she is going to be in a different position from everyone else."
The decision on which witnesses will be called will be made by her successor, Lord Justice Scott Baker.
Lady Butler-Sloss's appearance ended on a sour note, as she accused Mr Mansfield and other lawyers of dictating terms of the inquest.
She also complained of "dversarial and quite aggressive letters" she had received from solicitors for the Harrods boss, the Ritz hotel and Henri Paul, the driver of Diana and Dodi's limousine, who also died in the crash.
"I do feel a little bit as if I am the one in the dock," she told Mr Mansfield.
The 73-year-old, the former head of the High Court's family division, stood down because she felt she was not up to the task of handling the case.
There are fears this could further hamper the much delayed inquest.
Reader views (3)
If the Queen or anyone has evidence, have them bring it forward because the truth needs to come out. Otherwise everyone should let Diana "Rest In Peace"! Her children already have suffered, losing their mom was painful enough. "Why continue to bring something up that can cause them more pain?" I'm sure Diana would want them to move forward instead of bringing more pain onto them with the reminders that they no longer have her in their lives!
- Angela, Wisconsin, USA
The Queen, her husband Philip, her son Charles, her grandsons William & Harry, and anyone else remotely relevant should front up and give evidence. Until and unless they do, allegations of a cover-up will not be able to be denied. These people are not above the law and they should appear in a court of law if anything is to be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
- Judys, Australia
Whilst I agree that the royal family should never be exempt from giving evidence if it's necessary, in this instance it clearly is not necessary to hear evidence given by the Queen. This is simply a bitter old man trying to shame and embarrass the royal family in any way possible because he's still smarting at not being given a British passport. The death of his son and Princess Diana was a tragic accident pure and simple. Get over it for goodness sake.
- Geraldine, London
