Weather Tonight: 13°c Partly Cloudy Night Morning: 21°c Mostly cloudy

News

Jane Austen fan submits her work anonymously to publishers... and receives a dozen rejections

Last updated at 23:52pm on 18.07.07

 Add your view

 

It is a truth universally acknowledged that many of us who claim to have read a classic novel are telling porkies. Or have simply watched the film version instead.

This even applies, it seems, to literary agents and publishers.

For when a budding author sent typed chapters of Jane Austen's novels to 18 of them, changing just the titles and characters' names, only one recognised her words.

Scroll down for more

Lassman

David Lassman submitted three of Austen's classic works - Northanger Abbey, Pride and Prejudice and Persuasion - to 18 publishers and literary agents

Another managed to recognise they were 'a really original read'. But the rest simply rejected them or never responded, according to the man who posted the manuscripts, David Lassman.

"It was unbelievable," he said. "If the major publishers can't recognise great literature, who knows what might be slipping through the net?

"Here is one of the greatest writers that has lived, with her oeuvre securely fixed in the English canon and yet only one recipient recognised them as Austen's work."

Mr Lassman, 43, submitted opening chapters of three of Austen's classic works - Northanger Abbey, first published in 1798, Pride and Prejudice (1813) and Persuasion (1818).

He typed them out himself, and signed them Alison Laydee after Austen's early pseudonym A Lady.

To offer a few more hints, he called Pride and Prejudice 'First Impressions', the original title for the story, and wrote a return address of the Jane Austen Centre in Bath, where he works as the director of the Jane Austen Festival.

In response, the literary agency Christopher Little, which represents JK Rowling, said it was 'not confident of placing this material with a publisher'.

Scroll down for more

Austen

AuthorJane Austen (left), and her bestselling novel Pride and Prejudice

Penguin, which currently publishes Pride and Prejudice, responded that First Impressions 'seems like a really original and interesting read'. But there was no request to see the rest of the book.

Others to turn the works down included Bloomsbury, Random House, Harper Collins and Hodder & Stoughton. The only one who emerged with any credit was Alex Bowler, assistant editor at Jonathan Cape publishers.

His reply read: "I suggest you reach for your copy of Pride and Prejudice, which I'd guess lives in close proximity to your typewriter and make sure that your opening pages don't too closely mimic the book's opening. After all, there is such a thing as plagiarism."

Mr Lassman came up with the experiment when struggling to have his own novel published.

He said it highlighted the flaws in the publishing process.

"Getting a novel accepted is very difficult today unless you have an agent first, but I had no idea of the scale of rejection poor old Jane suffered.


Bookmark and Share
 
 

Reader views (3)

 Add your view

A fantastic experiment. I have often wondered about the great books that have not been published (mine included). Can you imagine if Jane lived today, we might never have known her wonderful works.

- Kathleen, Connecticut, USA, 19/07/2007 12:06
Report abuse

Considered a classic of her time, period dramas are generally bland and dreary affairs which have no real purpose so I can understand why they were rejected.

- Trevor Roll, London, 19/07/2007 10:18
Report abuse

I think this experiment is flawed. A non response does not mean that anyone fell for it. Also 'not confident of placing this material with a publisher' does not mean 'we think your work is original'... it simply means get lost! If I were a publisher or literary agent and came across this very obvious rouse I wouldn't bother putting pen to paper, merely right it off as a schoolboy prank.

- Natalia Grant, London, 19/07/2007 08:59
Report abuse


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.