Weather Afternoon: 6°c Sleet Tonight: 2°c Mostly cloudy

News

Euro treaty is a threat to Britain, warns Labour MP who wrote it

Last updated at 08:07am on 07.08.07

 Add your view

 

            Gisela Stuart

Former Labour minister Gisela Stuart has issued a stark warning to the Government over the Euro treaty


            John Redwood

Critical: Eurosceptic John Redwood agrees with Gisela Stuart that the treaty is a threat to Britain's powers

The revived EU constitution will pave the way for the first European 'government' with sweeping powers over Britain, one of its original architects warned yesterday.

The Prime Minister would be forced to represent the interests of the union rather than the UK under the terms of the deal, said former Labour minister Gisela Stuart.

Her warning came as the Conservatives claimed the agreement would see the biggest sacrifice of Britain's rights to block EU proposals in a single treaty - and could even allow Brussels to seize control of North Sea oil and gas reserves.

In a Parliamentary written answer, the Foreign Office listed 50 different areas where member states will lose their veto if the treaty is agreed. These include transport, energy, tourism, civil protection, space, research and common commercial policy.

Eurosceptic backbencher John Redwood, who tabled the question in the Commons, said the EU was grasping the power to force

the sharing of North Sea oil and gas in the event of a crisis in energy supply.

"It's easy to envisage circumstances of scarcity when the rest of the EU says this ought to be a common resource," he said.

The Foreign Office insisted the UK would be able to opt out of majority decisions in 13 areas, including social security and judicial and police co-operation. But the Tories said the Government's so-called "red lines" were exactly the same as in the failed 2005 version of the constitution, on which it did promise a referendum.

Miss Stuart, the Labour MP for Edgbaston who was a member of the group which drew up the original blueprint, said it was clear from the text of the new version that the European Council would get massivelyincreased powers. The body was originally set up in 1974 as an informal forum for heads of EU member states to meet.

But the treaty will formally incorporate the council into the EU's structure - and oblige EU leaders to "promote its values, advance its objectives, serve its interests' rather than those of member states.

Miss Stuart, now a fierce critic of the Government's refusal to offer a referendum, said: "It used to be that leaders met in order to co-ordinate the interest of the nation states.

"Under this new structure, that body where heads of state meet will become subordinate to the union's interests.

"They will now have a duty to represent the interests of the union, not the interests of the member state. It's a consolidation of the way the union works into a structure which is much more like a government."

She claims ministers are either being "deliberately disingenuous or ill-informed" when they claim the treaty is not substantial enough to merit a referendum.


Bookmark and Share
 
 

Reader views (2)

 Add your view

It's quite simple, no one wants it, therefore we shouldn't have it. We were promised a referendum on Europe and if we don't get it then what other reason would you need to vote Labour out at the next election?

- Pa Roddy, London, 07/08/2007 09:29
Report abuse

Looks like PM Brown is going to have to deny any undertakings he has given to Blair and acolytes about the Euro Treaty. My advice is stop taking Blair's calls and let's blow the Euro Treaty out of the water.

- Robert, Kirk Ella, East Yorks.,, 07/08/2007 08:22
Report abuse


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.