Morning:
8°c
With a single dessert and just two glasses of wine our bill was kept in check - but the effort of doing so was not much fun
Latest: Gordon Brown apologises for his poor handwriting and for misspelling the name of a dead soldier in a letter to the young man’s mother
More...
Muslim juror accused of wearing MP3 player under her hijab escapes punishment
Last updated at 00:07am on 17.08.07
Juror Ruhela Khanom in her headscarf
A Muslim juror accused of listening to an MP3 player under her headscarf during a murder trial will face no further action.
Ruhela Khanom, 20, was serving on jury panel when she was accused of secretly listening to music during the trial of pensioner Alan Wicks, who was later jailed for life for bludgeoning his wife to death.
After repeated lateness and complaints that she was playing music when she should have been paying attention to the evidence, she was discharged from the trial at London's Blackfriars Crown Court.
But yesterday the Attorney General's office ruled that there was "insufficient" evidence to prove any alleged contempt of court.
Khanom was accused of contempt of court in July when 72-year-old Wicks was in the dock denying his wife's murder.
Judge Chapple said at the time he had discharged Khanom because: "There was a complaint made by a fellow juror during the course of the luncheon adjournment.
"The juror had seen wires disappearing into the juror in question's headscarf and heard her music emanating from that juror while we were in court and everyone else listening with close attention to important evidence of the defendant."
"A member of the defence team had also noticed the wires. I said during the course of submissions I thought I heard the characteristic tinny sound of music from headphones fleetingly."
Khanom, of Bow, east London, was also accused of persistent lateness, trying to excuse herself from serving and not concentrating when she sat on a jury in the murder trial in July.
A statement by the office of the Attorney General, Baroness Scotland, said: "The Attorney General has considered carefully the papers in this matter, in particular the witness statements, and has concluded that there is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of proving beyond reasonable doubt any alleged contempt of court."
Following widespread criticism of her behaviour, she hit out at the "grasser" among her fellow jurors who landed her in trouble.
She said: "I have one thing to say, that this is all a great misunderstanding.
"What the judge and the grasser did not see is that my MP3 was disconnected from the headphone and put it in my bag.
"The truth is because I have to take my head scarf off every time to plug and unplug the ear phones from my head therefore I simply disconnected my MP3 from my head phone. That is it.
"And as far as my religion is concerned, when it shouldn't be, then I can say me wearing a head scarf shows my belief and my religion teaches me respect and I would not dare to go in a court room and listen to music, or when a man's life decision is concerned.
"It would be disrespectful of me to listen to music as I'm part of that decision.
"And as far as the women grassing, she did what she felt was right.
"However, she sat in the other end of the line of seats so she cannot claim she saw my MP3 or heard me listening to music. She just saw my headphone and was not aware that the MP3 was disconnected.
"Why would I listen to the MP3 in the court room? I had no intention of contempting the court or any other reason. I was aware of the important role I have being there."
Reader views (17)
I tend to believe that the girl was actually following the case, otherwise why to come to court at all? All her slamming is due to her religious way of dressing that many don't like.
- Ramil, Moscow, RF
This woman is stating her case fairly, and should be listened to.
Her religion has nothing to do with the mp3 case. If she says that she wasn't listening to the music, then just believe her. Just look at what a silly mp3 player can do to the perception of Islam.
Craziness.
- Anon, UK
If a white middle-class male had done this he would have been sent to jail immediately by the judge. It is clear that purely because of this individual's overt parading of her religion she has escaped punishment that every other group in this society would have receive there and then.
I am a former holder of her Majesty's Commission and am near retirement. I had never considered not living out my days in England but I now seriously consider myself unwelcome in my own country and will as soon as I can find another country (where I shall learn that country's language) which will look after its indigenous population on a basis that does not give privileges to those who flaunt those norms of behaviour which do not accord with their own cultural prejudices.
- Donald Cambell, Stoke on Trent, UK
Heaven forbid that she was found guilty, we don't want to offend her delicate feelings! Were would it all end? I myself have done jury service and we were told all electronic items were not to be taken into the court room. What makes her so special and above the law?
- Max, London, UK
It beggars belief!
- Peter, Herts
She admits she had headphones in, so how could she hear what was being said?
- Tony, London
She should have been locked up for comtempt. Hasn't this just set precedence for others to listen to MP3s whilst on Jury service?
- Graeme, London
If as she claimed she had to 'remove her hijab to disconnect the MP3' then why didn't she go to the ladies loo on arrival and do just that? Nope, I agree with Casper and Brian: the decision not to prosecute was a 'political' one. At least she was 'named and shamed'.
- Karen, London UK
One does get the feeling of a sacred cow being stepped around, how much evidence do they need, she was hiding an MP3 player that was playing music under her head-wear, clearly in contempt of court - but, as with so many other sectors apparently these days, she seems to be 'untouchable'.
- Neil, Notting Hill Gate
She did not have sufficient respect to turn up on time and not doodle the whole time. It obviously did occur to to tell her flow jurors that the headphone weren't connected. Such a "respectful" person.
- Mary Breading, Hornchurch, Essex
What a load of rubbish, she does not have to remove her scarf to unplug earphones and to think the judge allowed her to get away with this. I'm sure if it had been any other nationality they would have been punished.
- Sarah, London
It makes you wonder what else can be smuggled in under a hijab? This is a clear security issue and needs to be addressed. The hijab is banned in Tunisia and that is a Muslim country, we should do the same here.
- Brandon Thomas, London UK
What surprised me about all this is the fact that this woman was able to take such a device into a court of law.
I assume that the court's security was unable to detect such a device. Or is it that she is a Muslim and that the security officers did not want to "offend" her by searching her?
- P.Robinson, Northants
No headgear whatsoever should be allowed in court.
- Susanne, London
What a charming lass. And full points to the 'grasser'. They did the right thing and it is disgusting that this woman has not been held to account for her actions. A pure disgrace.
- Ann Smith, London
I wonder how many other non Muslim jurors would have got away with that!
- Brian, London
So nothing to do with the fact that she was Muslim and we can't offend her?
- Casper, London UK
