Weather Tonight: 3°c Partly Cloudy Night Morning: 6°c Cloudy

News

Brussels wants to scrap labels saying 'Made in Britain'

Last updated at 14:07pm on 21.11.07

 Add your view

 

Ministers were last night under pressure to reject an attempt by Brussels to scrap 'Made in Britain' food labels.

Proposals to switch to a Europe-wide 'Made in the EU' labelling system will be discussed by the European Commission next month.

The scheme provoked outrage at Westminster, with the Tories pledging to save the traditional British labels on foods ranging from Stilton to Marmite.

Scroll down for more...

Quality mark: But food labels like this could be outlawed

If implemented it would leave British consumers unable to tell where the contents of their shopping basket come from in the EU.

The rule would apply even if the final product is based on imported foodstuffs.

Only meat would be exempt, so that goods such as Danish bacon and Parma ham could be identified by their origin.

Westminster sources indicated that Gordon Brown, who has made no secret of his dislike of Brussels bureaucracy, is likely to veto the idea.

Europe Minister Jim Murphy told MPs Britain would fight the proposal, which was put forward by Cypriot health commissioner Markos Kyprianou.

The Tories were outraged by the plan. Europe spokesman Mark Francois said: 'British farmers are under enough pressure as it is without the EU obscuring what food comes from Britain and what doesn't.

'If British consumers want to support British farmers, they have a right to know the food was produced here.'

The leader of UKIP, Nigel Farage, said: 'It's time to become like the French and ignore this stupid EU law.'

The idea of an EU-wide labelling scheme was first put forward three years ago.

But it was ditched after an outcry from politicians and business leaders across the EU, who warned it would deal a hammer blow to traditional food manufacture.

Dutch Labour MEP Dorette Corbey warned the EU labels could also prevent consumers from establishing how far their food has travelled from producer to shop.

'The trend is to look at where a product originates from,' she said.

'Transport over long distances is bad for the environment.'

The plan, which is due to be published in December, was leaked yesterday to Dutch media. Politicians there also criticised the proposal, calling it 'too general' and bad for the environment.

A similar plan in 2004 was quashed by Britain, Germany and the Netherlands, on the grounds it was unnecessary and too costly.

The 'Made in the EU' plan is part of a package of proposals on labelling designed to give consumers more information on food content such as the levels of salt and fat.

Brussels gave up the fight in September to make Britain drop pints, pounds and miles in favour of the metric system.

But Britain's growing wine industry is now also under threat. Just as the popularity of English wine is soaring, the European Commission wants to limit the planting of new vineyards for the next six years.

The rules would punish countries whose wine industry is expanding, such as Britain.


Bookmark and Share
 
 

Reader views (3)

 Add your view

England shall remain England! or at least until Brussels gets involved! Then you shall be EU with no identity, no currency, no banner, no gender and no control over your own country!

- John (British Expat), Phoenix USA, 21/11/2007 22:57
Report abuse

What's wrong with putting the name of the new federal government (to be created by the Reform Treaty) on food products? Food products that are produced in Idaho and other U.S. states often just say "Product of U.S.A.".

The new country will be European Union, so why not use its name? I expect to see it on many items, besides food items. More and more you'll see it. The British people had better get used to the idea that the Reform Treaty is the start of a federal system of government, with the U.K., France, Germany, etc., as provinces. The Reform Treaty Bill will be (by very far) the greatest piece of legislation that has been passed through the UK Parliament in modern times. It terminates the U.K. effectively as a sovereign country. Every British citizen should have had a say on the loss of sovereignty involved, but Gordon has decided against that. I don't see a lot of upset over that decision -- at least not YET!

- Phil Jones, London UK, 21/11/2007 20:15
Report abuse

In the words of a Dusty Springfield song from the 60s -

"Little by little by little by little by little..."

- Rogan, Dallas TX, 21/11/2007 18:39
Report abuse


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.