School's bizarre ploy to beat internet perverts - masking pupils with Acid House smileys

 Add your view

A primary school has been accused of being alarmist for covering up the faces of pupils on its website – apparently to protect them from paedophiles.

Bizarrely, the images have been altered with the type of smiley faces popular during the Acid House dance craze of the 1980s.

The decision was taken at Cann Hall Primary School in Clacton, Essex.

Scroll down for more...

Smiles all round: Cann Hall Primary decided to cover pupils' faces online with 'smileys'

Headmistress Clare Reece said yesterday: "The public nature of the internet is an issue we feel strongly about.

"Not all parents want their children's picture on there.

"You can't say what is going to happen with any of those pictures."

She said that the photographs were printed unaltered in the school newsletter which was sent to parents.

But on the primary's website, the children's faces are obscured.

The school guarantees the content of the site is "child friendly", adding: "In order to protect our children, we have made the decision not to include any photos of our pupils on this website."

Scroll down for more...

Not so proud: The football team have their faces covered to stop people recognising them

Previously, faces were simply blurred, but newer pictures, including action shots of the athletics tournament, use the smiley faces.

However, one child in a line-up of medal winners has been singled out – he alone has been given a sad face.

Children's charity NCH yesterday said that schools were right to be cautious about putting children's pictures on the internet if they were vulnerable or in care.

However, spokesman Shaun Kelly added: "The images shocked me, actually. What message is it giving?

"It looks very, very odd. If you want to obscure children's faces you can obscure them with pixels.

"We need to be cautious about taking images of children out of the media."

Scroll down for more...

Sports day: Originally these pictures were published uncensored in a paper newsletter

Frank Furedi, a sociology professor at the University of Kent, said the school was being alarmist.

"Every time a school takes silly measures, it says we see the world through the eyes of a paedophile.

"They think that any innocent picture of school children will somehow be subverted and manipulated.

"These pictures serve a very important purpose of giving children clear images of their experiences, something they can remember later in life.

"Depriving ourselves of these experiences is not only irrational but serves no purpose whatsoever."

Scroll down for more...

Outrage: Parents have mixed feelings about the school's 'irrational' decision

However, some parents at the school said they supported the decision.

One said: "I wouldn't want my child's face on a disgusting site.'

But Michaela Day, 35, whose eight-year-old son, Connor, attends the school, said: "If they are covering the children's faces, what is the point of using the photographs? It's a waste of time."

A spokesman for the Department for Children, Schools and Families said that it advises schools to get permission from parents or carers in writing before publishing photographs of pupils on a website or in a prospectus. However, this is not a legal requirement.

The school took down the controversial pictures from its website at around 3pm yesterday.

A message on the website said: "Our newsletter section is undergoing maintenance. Back soon!"

 

What's on today   What's on tomorrow

Receive our newsletter