Latvian seeks £4m payout after being jailed for killing Nazi sympathisers
Last updated at 17:04pm on 26.06.08
Freedom fighter: Vasiliy Kononov during the war
More than 60 years after the end of World War Two, a man is to be judged by Europe's highest court on whether he was right or wrong to kill Nazi sympathisers collaborating with Hitler.
Latvian Vasiliy Kononov, 85, is claiming compensation of £4 million for being convicted and sentenced to six years imprisonment by his own country in 2001 for the unlawful killing of civilians who had betrayed a partisan group to the Germans.
Kononov, a guerrilla attached to the Soviet Red Army, helped kill the civilian collaborators after tricking them into admitting they had handed the partisans over to the Nazis.
Years later courts in Latvia found him guilty of crimes against humanity.
But Kononov is claiming that he acted correctly in killing the nine civilians in a Latvian village in 1944, because at the time he was legitimately fighting with the Red Army, and on the side of the Allies including Britain, to repel the Nazis from the Baltic state.
He also claims that he is the victim of political correctness in modern day Latvia, a European Union country where the State now openly defends those who fought for the Nazis against the Soviet army in the Second World War.
The Latvians argue the Soviets were seen as the greater threat to the country's independence, and this justified siding with Hitler.
The verdict from the European Court of Human Rights, due next month, will effectively re-open the issue of war crimes during the Second World War as established under the Nuremberg trials, by deciding whether a man can be punished for fighting against the Nazis.
It is seen as a test case which could lead to other financial claims in eastern Europe.
'During the war, Kononov was a specialist mine layer who personally destroyed 14 German troop trains heading into his country,' said his lawyer Mikhail Joffe.

Court battle: Vasiliy Kononov today aged 85 and his lawyer Mikhail Joffe who is taking his case to the European Court of Human Rights
In March, 1944 he was assigned to discover the fate of a partisan group of 12 men led by a Major Chugunov who disappeared near the village of Maliye Baty after being betrayed by villagers in the pay of the Nazis.
Disguised in a Nazi greatcoat, Kononov talked to villagers who boasted how they had betrayed the partisans.
Then Kononov and his men held a war court that convicted the villagers. The villagers were given a written judgement sentencing them to death.
Most were shot, although a man, and two women were in a building that Kononov set on fire and died in the flames.
In all, nine people were killed, including a child, which Kononov admitted was a mistake.
Kononov, who later became a police colonel in Latvia, was arrested in February 1998.
Convicted to six years, he spent 620 days in jail during which time his brother and son died. Kononov was not let out to the funerals.
Human rights lawyer Joffe then began the series of appeals that will end in Strasbourg next month.
The case brings into focus Latvia's contempt for the former Soviet Union after over four decades of occupation, with Kononov being cast as a Stalinist thug massacring civilians.
It hinges on whether the highly decorated former guerilla can be classified as a Soviet occupier of Latvia or as a Latvian citizen fighting the Nazi invaders.
'The Latvian courts agree that Kononov was a member of an anti-Hitler coalition, they do not dispute that,' said Joffe.
'They also agree that those villagers were in collaboration with Nazis.
'Yet they claim that Kononov was representing Soviet occupiers and killed the civilians who were acting according to the laws of that time.
'But this is nonsense. He is a native Latvian, he was fighting for his country.
'And according to the rules of war, people taking guns from invaders in exchange for food and protection were not civilians anymore, but collaborators.
'This process is purely political like other things Latvia has been doing recently - such as reburying Nazis as heroes, and organising monuments and eternal flames at Nazi cemeteries.'
Kononov, now 85, said : 'I have never doubted that I was fighting for the right thing.
'It was a shock for me to know that what I did to defend my country is now considered a crime.'
Reader views (4)
Here's a sample of the latest views published.
He committed war crimes - it is irrelevant who's side he was on. If he had fought for the Nazis, this would not be in court. The Red Army committed countless atrocities - as many, if not more than the Germans, though history fails to acknowledge this.
- Florian Geyer, Harrogate, UK
Hitlers attack on Russia was about 6 weeks in advance of the planned Russian attack on eastern Europe. This is an established fact often ignored in the English media but not in Germany or Eastern Europe.In 1941 the majority of the people in the Baltic States greeted the Germans as liberators. Anyone who sided with the Red army was regarded as a traitor and in many peoples eyes still are.
This man is lucky to still be alive to face court. If an Englishman on Guernsey killed other Englishman who were friendly to the Germans during the war he would have been punished by the Germans or after the war by the English Anyone armed in civilian clothes caught behind enemy lines can expect to be shot on either side. Stalin was a monster that dwarfed Hitler. The German Army were saints compared to the Red Army. If Germans are still be charged with Second War World "crimes " so should this man. None of the war crimes committed by the allies have ever been punished. Bomber Harris said "if we lose the war I will be treated as a war criminal". England survived but did not win the war,lucky for him.
- John Smith, chichester england
They are right. Now I think it is time the US Government prosecutes any family who fought against the British to give the US independence. They also committed crimes against humanity.
- Cyberrifles, United States, Torrance
Crimes against humanity are crimes against humanity. It matters not a jot who killed whom.
Vasiliy Kononov is as complicit in murder as a Latvian rounding up Jews and killing them. If guilty of those killings he was correctly convicted and punished and is not entitled to compensation. But the Nuremberg trials are continuously exposed as a farce; no one was treated fairly or equally by them.
Let's not forget ordinary citizens of occupied regions often paid a very high price for partisan activities. Their guerrilla actions could sometimes bring horrific reprisals upon innocent communities and were feared by those people genuinely prepared to accommodate and tolerate occupying forces with the least possible fuss.
- Neal, London
Tonight:
14°c

It’s amazing to learn they did any research at all — unless it was into farting and foreskins





