How China's taking over Africa, and why the West should be VERY worried
Last updated at 17:16pm on 18.07.08
On June 5, 1873, in a letter to The Times, Sir Francis Galton, the cousin of Charles Darwin and a distinguished African explorer in his own right, outlined a daring (if by today's standards utterly offensive) new method to 'tame' and colonise what was then known as the Dark Continent.
'My proposal is to make the encouragement of Chinese settlements of Africa a part of our national policy, in the belief that the Chinese immigrants would not only maintain their position, but that they would multiply and their descendants supplant the inferior Negro race,' wrote Galton.
'I should expect that the African seaboard, now sparsely occupied by lazy, palavering savages, might in a few years be tenanted by industrious, order-loving Chinese, living either as a semidetached dependency of China, or else in perfect freedom under their own law.'
Close relations: Chinese President Hu Jintao accompanies Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe to a ceremony in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing
Despite an outcry in Parliament and heated debate in the august salons of the Royal Geographic Society, Galton insisted that 'the history of the world tells the tale of the continual displacement of populations, each by a worthier successor, and humanity gains thereby'.
A controversial figure, Galton was also the pioneer of eugenics, the theory that was used by Hitler to try to fulfil his mad dreams of a German Master Race.
Eventually, Galton's grand resettlement plans fizzled out because there were much more exciting things going on in Africa.
But that was more than 100 years ago, and with legendary explorers such as Livingstone, Speke and Burton still battling to find the source of the Nile - and new discoveries of exotic species of birds and animals featuring regularly on newspaper front pages - vast swathes of the continent had not even been 'discovered'.
Yet Sir Francis Galton, it now appears, was ahead of his time. His vision is coming true - if not in the way he imagined. An astonishing invasion of Africa is now under way.
In the greatest movement of people the world has ever seen, China is secretly working to turn the entire continent into a new colony.
Reminiscent of the West's imperial push in the 18th and 19th centuries - but on a much more dramatic, determined scale - China's rulers believe Africa can become a 'satellite' state, solving its own problems of over-population and shortage of natural resources at a stroke.
With little fanfare, a staggering 750,000 Chinese have settled in Africa over the past decade. More are on the way.
The strategy has been carefully devised by officials in Beijing, where one expert has estimated that China will eventually need to send 300 million people to Africa to solve the problems of over-population and pollution.
The plans appear on track. Across Africa, the red flag of China is flying. Lucrative deals are being struck to buy its commodities - oil, platinum, gold and minerals. New embassies and air routes are opening up. The continent's new Chinese elite can be seen everywhere, shopping at their own expensive boutiques, driving Mercedes and BMW limousines, sending their children to exclusive private schools.
The pot-holed roads are cluttered with Chinese buses, taking people to markets filled with cheap Chinese goods. More than a thousand miles of new Chinese railroads are crisscrossing the continent, carrying billions of tons of illegally-logged timber, diamonds and gold.

New horizons? Mugabe has said: 'We must turn from the West and face the East'
The trains are linked to ports dotted around the coast, waiting to carry the goods back to Beijing after unloading cargoes of cheap toys made in China.
Confucius Institutes (state-funded Chinese 'cultural centres') have sprung up throughout Africa, as far afield as the tiny land-locked countries of Burundi and Rwanda, teaching baffled local people how to do business in Mandarin and Cantonese.
Massive dams are being built, flooding nature reserves. The land is scarred with giant Chinese mines, with 'slave' labourers paid less than £1 a day to extract ore and minerals.
Pristine forests are being destroyed, with China taking up to 70 per cent of all timber from Africa.
All over this great continent, the Chinese presence is swelling into a flood. Angola has its own 'Chinatown', as do great African cities such as Dar es Salaam and Nairobi.
Exclusive, gated compounds, serving only Chinese food, and where no blacks are allowed, are being built all over the continent. 'African cloths' sold in markets on the continent are now almost always imported, bearing the legend: 'Made in China'.
From Nigeria in the north, to Equatorial Guinea, Gabon and Angola in the west, across Chad and Sudan in the east, and south through Zambia, Zimbabwe and Mozambique, China has seized a vice-like grip on a continent which officials have decided is crucial to the superpower's long-term survival.
'The Chinese are all over the place,' says Trevor Ncube, a prominent African businessman with publishing interests around the continent. 'If the British were our masters yesterday, the Chinese have taken their place.'
Likened to one race deciding to adopt a new home on another planet, Beijing has launched its so-called 'One China In Africa' policy because of crippling pressure on its own natural resources in a country where the population has almost trebled from 500 million to 1.3 billion in 50 years.
China is hungry - for land, food and energy. While accounting for a fifth of the world's population, its oil consumption has risen 35-fold in the past decade and Africa is now providing a third of it; imports of steel, copper and aluminium have also shot up, with Beijing devouring 80 per cent of world supplies.
President Robert Mugabe leaving the eleventh ordinary session of the assembly of the African Union heads of State and government in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt
Fuelling its own boom at home, China is also desperate for new markets to sell goods. And Africa, with non-existent health and safety rules to protect against shoddy and dangerous goods, is the perfect destination.
The result of China's demand for raw materials and its sales of products to Africa is that turnover in trade between Africa and China has risen from £5million annually a decade ago to £6billion today.
However, there is a lethal price to pay. There is a sinister aspect to this invasion. Chinese-made war planes roar through the African sky, bombing opponents. Chinese-made assault rifles and grenades are being used to fuel countless murderous civil wars, often over the materials the Chinese are desperate to buy.
Take, for example, Zimbabwe. Recently, a giant container ship from China was due to deliver its cargo of three million rounds of AK-47 ammunition, 3,000 rocket-propelled grenades and 1,500 mortars to President Robert Mugabe's regime.
After an international outcry, the vessel, the An Yue Jiang, was forced to return to China, despite Beijing's insistence that the arms consignment was a 'normal commercial deal'.
Indeed, the 77-ton arms shipment would have been small beer - a fraction of China's help to Mugabe. He already has high-tech, Chinese-built helicopter gunships and fighter jets to use against his people.
Ever since the U.S. and Britain imposed sanctions in 2003, Mugabe has courted the Chinese, offering mining concessions for arms and currency.
While flying regularly to Beijing as a high-ranking guest, the 84-year-old dictator rants at 'small dots' such as Britain and America.
He can afford to. Mugabe is orchestrating his campaign of terror from a 25-bedroom, pagoda-style mansion built by the Chinese. Much of his estimated £1billion fortune is believed to have been siphoned off from Chinese 'loans'.
The imposing grey building of ZANU-PF, his ruling party, was paid for and built by the Chinese. Mugabe received £200 million last year alone from China, enabling him to buy loyalty from the army.
In another disturbing illustration of the warm relations between China and the ageing dictator, a platoon of the China People's Liberation Army has been out on the streets of Mutare, a city near the border with Mozambique, which voted against the president in the recent, disputed election.
Almost 30 years ago, Britain pulled out of Zimbabwe - as it had done already out of the rest of Africa, in the wake of Harold Macmillan's 'wind of change' speech. Today, Mugabe says: 'We have turned East, where the sun rises, and given our backs to the West, where the sun sets.'
Despite Britain's commendable colonial legacy of a network of roads, railways and schools, the British are now being shunned.
According to one veteran diplomat: 'China is easier to do business with because it doesn't care about human rights in Africa - just as it doesn't care about them in its own country. All the Chinese care about is money.'
Nowhere is that more true than Sudan. Branded 'Africa's Killing Fields', the massive oil-rich East African state is in the throes of the genocide and slaughter of hundreds of thousands of black, non-Arab peasants in southern Sudan.
In effect, through its supplies of arms and support, China has been accused of underwriting a humanitarian scandal. The atrocities in Sudan have been described by the U.S. as 'the worst human rights crisis in the world today'.

Mugabe has received hundreds of millions of pounds from Chinese sources
The government in Khartoum has helped the feared Janjaweed militia to rape, murder and burn to death more than 350,000 people.
The Chinese - who now buy half of all Sudan's oil - have happily provided armoured vehicles, aircraft and millions of bullets and grenades in return for lucrative deals. Indeed, an estimated £1billion of Chinese cash has been spent on weapons.
According to Human Rights First, a leading human rights advocacy organisation, Chinese-made AK-47 assault rifles, grenade launchers and ammunition for rifles and heavy machine guns are continuing to flow into Darfur, which is dotted with giant refugee camps, each containing hundreds of thousands of people.
Between 2003 and 2006, China sold Sudan $55 million worth of small arms, flouting a United Nations weapons embargo.
With new warnings that the cycle of killing is intensifying, an estimated two thirds of the non-Arab population has lost at least one member of their families in Darfur.
Although two million people have been uprooted from their homes in the conflict, China has repeatedly thwarted United Nations denunciations of the Sudanese regime.
While the Sudanese slaughter has attracted worldwide condemnation, prompting Hollywood film-maker Steven Spielberg to quit as artistic director of the Beijing Olympics, few parts of Africa are now untouched by China.
In Congo, more than £2billion has been 'loaned' to the government. In Angola, £3 billion has been paid in exchange for oil. In Nigeria, more than £5billion has been handed over.
In Equatorial Guinea, where the president publicly hung his predecessor from a cage suspended in a theatre before having him shot, Chinese firms are helping the dictator build an entirely new capital, full of gleaming skyscrapers and, of course, Chinese restaurants.
After battling for years against the white colonial powers of Britain, France, Belgium and Germany, post-independence African leaders are happy to do business with China for a straightforward reason: cash.
With western loans linked to an insistence on democratic reforms and the need for 'transparency' in using the money (diplomatic language for rules to ensure dictators do not pocket millions), the Chinese have proved much more relaxed about what their billions are used for.
Certainly, little of it reaches the continent's impoverished 800 million people. Much of it goes straight into the pockets of dictators. In Africa, corruption is a multi-billion pound industry and many experts believe that China is fuelling the cancer.
The Chinese are contemptuous of such criticism. To them, Africa is about pragmatism, not human rights. 'Business is business,' says Chinese Deputy Foreign Minister Zhou Wenzhong, adding that Beijing should not interfere in 'internal' affairs. 'We try to separate politics from business.'
While the bounty has, not surprisingly, been welcomed by African dictators, the people of Africa are less impressed. At a market in Zimbabwe recently, where Chinese goods were on sale at nearly every stall, one woman told me she would not waste her money on 'Zing-Zong' products.
'They go Zing when they work, and then they quickly go Zong and break,' she said. 'They are a waste of money. But there's nothing else. China is the only country that will do business with us.'
There have also been riots in Zambia, Angola and Congo over the flood of Chinese immigrant workers. The Chinese do not use African labour where possible, saying black Africans are lazy and unskilled.
In Angola, the government has agreed that 70 per cent of tendered public works must go to Chinese firms, most of which do not employ Angolans.
As well as enticing hundreds of thousands to settle in Africa, they have even shipped Chinese prisoners to produce the goods cheaply.
In Kenya, for example, only ten textile factories are still producing, compared with 200 factories five years ago, as China undercuts locals in the production of 'African' souvenirs.
Where will it all end? As far as Beijing is concerned, it will stop only when Africa no longer has any minerals or oil to be extracted from the continent.
A century after Sir Francis Galton outlined his vision for Africa, the Chinese are here to stay. More will come.
The people of this bewitching, beautiful continent, where humankind first emerged from the Great Rift Valley, desperately need progress. The Chinese are not here for that.
They are here for plunder. After centuries of pain and war, Africa deserves better.
Reader views (17)
Here's a sample of the latest views published.
Even though your article raises a very valid and serious threat, not just to africa but the entire planet i.e. where will chinas thirst for raw materials end (personally i believe we should just deal with them now before china becomes an even greater threat), how on earth is it different from what every other countries attitude towards africa has been, britain and the european powers exploited africa for years, during the cold war the USSR and NATO members both sought to provide arms, materials and funding in return for support (something the united states still does, ever wondered how Mugabe got to power in the first place? look it up) and now the chinese are exploiting africa to be honest who actually gives a toss, if africans can't be bothered to help themselves then i can't be bothered to care about them.
- Tom Allison, kent, England
I laughed at Western intellectual. This is all the excuse you can come up with to wash away your sins and responsibility in making the "Dark Continent" darker.
- Chinois, America, USA
Sista Loretta, you are ignorant, racist, and a disgrace to African Americans.
Instead of backing up your outlandish claims, you decide to delve into racial filth that has no place in such an intellectual & meaningful topic.
The basic premise of your argument is that: the white man is behind it. Whitey is behind every bad thing that ever happens.
Instead of feeding your mind with ignorance, open it up instead. An open mind will allow you to see past your racial ghosts.
- Joe, Guam. USA
The push into Africa wouldn't be happening if it weren't for Africa's corrupt leaders and a populous that's relatively unaware at how bad they are being taken advantage of by their elected leaders. Somehow I can't find it it me to blame the Chinese. The real outrage is that these leaders are allowing all of this to happen. More of my thoughts on China and Africa here "The Next 2 Billion"
- Jon Gos, Kampala, Uganda
Of course this is colonialisation all over again but with a yellow face backed by the same pale anglo ones! I think Dr Frances Cress-Wellsing and Mr. Neely Fuller calls them "buffer" races. Basically China is doing the dirty work for their white handlers. Make no mistake about it, behind the Chinese "invasion" are the Brits, the Germans, the Dutch, the Americans, the French, and the Arabs along with any other non-African interest who has deep enough pockets to play in this game of "Kill the Black." African nations must dispell the Chinese right along with the Europeans (that includes Israel), the Arabs, Indians, and any other faction that seeks to exploit Africa for its natural, Creator-given wealth. We can get it together on our own without interference from "aliens". In fact we need to do this first before become global as a league of African nations. Once this begins, it will be the start of a new, stronger, self governing, fruitful Africa.
- Sista Loretta, Oakland California, USA
Horrifying! we are only repeating history again!
- Shermayne M Brown, United States
francis wut are you talking about??? U.S. made weapons is still mostly used in Africa , go look it up stop being hypocrites.
- Congoman, Congo
I have no problems with China expanding it's economy, I have a problem with the unscrupulous actions it is taking, especially in regards to arms sales and Chinese labour. It is one thing to replace African goods with cheap alternatives, but it is another ball game if you're going to sell military equipment to war torn countries.
I realise that the west is not exactly innocent in this respect; a la U.S arms sales to Taiwan, but Taiwan itself is not in an open conflict. Offering dictators and fundamentalist militias billions of dollars of arms that are still warm from the factory is unethical, especially when it is in the contradiction of U.N. sanctions.
I happily admit that African countries are disenfranchised with the west, due to the after effects of colonialism, blatant racism, and the predatorial actions of the World Bank among others. But to improve their situation we have to take positive steps, like the unconditional removal of loans, or improvement of infrastructure to improve education and living conditions. The one reason why the Chinese are gaining such popularity and carte blanche is that they are offering cash money in return for removing natural materials and making cheap products on their soil. I am not saying that this is a re-collonistation of Africa or saying that China should not be allowed to take part in the African market but rather that their involvement be monitored to prevent the already appalling conditions of Africa become worse.
- Francis, Melbourne Australia
I take this as my right to commend on a business focus, that we are in a liberal market and that every one can venture anywhere. Who after all, said that we are puppets of the west. Let the East also have their market share. I do not take this as a colonization because that is another concept which is not applicable in a sovereign state.
Keep in touch for more views.
- Peter Musyoki Kithusya, Nairobi-Kenya
Well said Rick, San Deigo.The rot is found at the roots of the World Bank/IMF/RIIF/CFR and UN - the only solution is a rejection of the banking system as it has stood for the past few hundred years, based on exploitation and usury. How can this be achieved? It can only be achieved through personal action. Stop supporting the system by paying taxes, VAT and in any other way to register absolute protest and rejection of exploitation. Minimise use of 'convenience' traps such as credit and the ubiquitous oyster card and revitalise use and circulation of cash.
Demand that our Guv's issue interest-free money into the economy. Barter and better still, create community-based currencies.
It's about taking personal responsibility and the corrupt system will continue because we support it. Withdraw support, it can only collapse. But who wants to take responsibility? Far easier to 'blame the Guv' whilst paying them to do exactly as they please!
- Daftaida, London
-From the article:
" African leaders are happy to do business with China for a straightforward reason: cash."
And why are the African countries strapped for cash? I heard that Africa has paid 5 times the amount of its original loans from the World Bank in interest. A net flow of resources from poor nations to rich Western nations has set the stage for this "slanty-eyed takeover." (In parody of racial stereotyping of Chinese)
Remember also that China was placed on "most favoured-nation status" by Clinton and that the UN considers China to be the "Model State." Remember also the many wealthiest White families have set up in China, building huge mansions there as they oversee the 'development' of China's police state, for their own benefit. (Canada's Maurice Strong, for example.)
China is in league with the West.
From the article -"Today, Mugabe says: 'We have turned East, where the sun rises, and given our backs to the West, where the sun sets.'
But if you go far enough into the East, where do you end up? Back in the West. Just like Francis Galton's vision.
- Rick, San Diego
I long for the days of when Africa was a mighty land. I can only read about Queen Candice (Kandake) of Ethiopia soundly scaring away Alexander the Great with her African war elephants. Her successors also soundly defeated Roman Emperors that ventured past already weakened Egypt.
- Shabazz Moor, Harlem NY
I agree with Zhubaazji from San Diego. I think that Americans and Europeans are hypocritical for condemning Chinese investment in Africa without examining its own energy and mineral interests in countries like Nigeria and especially the Congo.
All around the continent, the story is the same: ultra-violent militia displace people from the most resource rich land, so that they're the ones holding the territory when the Americans, Chinese, French, or Canadians show up with an appetite for oil or bauxite.
So why is Sudan the most reported? Maybe the story makes more sense to white Europeans and Americans when the perpetrators are "slanty-eyed, short, yellow automatons with no human compassion," and better yet when their accomplices are "Islamic extremist Janjaweed anti-Christian terrorists."
I hope my post doesn't get deleted for these offensive stereotypes, because I think we forget how effective they are in absolving ourselves of the same crimes--not just 100 years ago, but right now in the Congo. "All the Chinese care about is money," says a diplomat in this story. What representative from any country on planet Earth has the right to say that?
This is an interesting story, but there's a bigger story here, and the EU and America are a big part of it.
- Kyle, Portland, OR
"Commendable colonial legacy?"
If ever there is an oxymoron!!
Why are the Africans poorer after 400 years of after being "discovered" by white men? If anything, the presence of the Chinese in African has brought in competition, and today the West is forced to offer competitive terms, and the natives benefit.
- Zhubaazji, San Diego, California
The competition has began for the second invasion of Africa's natural resources. This one is going to be different because china is in the game. The reality of it all is the ping pong that game played by the west and the soviet union for the control of Africa before the Russians lost. But china is already cheating in this ping pong game. Take a look at Sudan? It is a shame for all humanity.
- Albert Ansah, Upland ca
Its seems like China is supplying the guns for the people of the African continent to irradiate themselves. It is so terrible that the African people can not see that they are handing their continent, country, resources, homes, and lives over so someone who feels they are too lazy and unskilled to better themselves.
I wish they would stop the shooting and pick up a book to learn how to make the country that they live be there for their children.
- My Opinion, Philadelphia USA
"Despite Britain's commendable colonial legacy of a network of roads, railways and schools"
China has built more roads and schools in Africa since the 70's than Britian or the US. Europe and America's presence in Africa dwarfs that of China's. There are 40 times more European/Americans in Africa than Chinese. After decolonialization, Western powers built elephant projects which placed many African countries in debt. Equatorial Guinea's dictator is supported by the US (US has oil interests there) ... as well as the regime in Nigeria. France sent its military recently to prop up their dictator in Chad where 1% of Chad's population voted in its Western supported "democracy." Let's not forget regimes around the world that are being supported by the US and Europe: Saudi Arabia (good luck fighting a war on "terror" with the Wahabis as a key ally), Kuwait (why no demand for democracy in the Persian Gulf War?), Dubai, Yemen Egypt etc (the US props up these regimes with US military bases and funding), Burma (France didn't sanction its major oil interests there), Pakistan (Musharif hijacking elections Mugabe-style), and on and on.
The reality is that every major power is doing business in Africa and its the mindset of victimization of Africans that need to be changed.
- Sven, Los Angeles, California
Tonight:
14°c

It’s amazing to learn they did any research at all — unless it was into farting and foreskins
