Weather Tonight: 3°c Partly Cloudy Night Morning: 6°c Cloudy

News

Security breaches increase at HM Revenue and Customs following data disc fiasco

Last updated at 01:27am on 20.08.08

 Add your view

 


HM Revenue & Customs

HM Revenue & Customs headquarters in London

Security breaches at HM Revenue & Customs have risen dramatically since the data discs fiasco, figures show.

Despite pledges to tighten up after the loss of 25million child benefit records, the agency has had ten breaches a day since October last year, compared to eight per day the previous year.

They include the losses of computers containing information about members of the public and mobile phones with private numbers stored in them.

Tory Treasury spokesman Philip Hammond said: 'How can the Government claim to be taking data security seriously when the number of breaches at the Revenue has actually increased?'

Figures in Parliamentary written answers show that since October 2007 there have been 1,993 incidents. At that rate, there will be more than 2,700 breaches by this October - a rise of 28 per cent.

Treasury Minister Jane Kennedy said: 'This high level of reporting reflects the increased awareness of staff following the child benefit data loss in October 2007.'

Meanwhile ,it emerged that Paul Gray, the civil servant responsible for losing the child benefit discs, has a new job with a firm which has £650,000 worth of contracts with the Government.

Mr Gray, who left HMRC with a £2.3million pension, is helping Praesta's executives 'develop their potential'.


Bookmark and Share
 
 

Reader views (1)

 Add your view

What a joke. The knuckle dragging stupidity of public servants needs to be clamped down on with the same severity as in the private sector. If Praesta are so inept that they need assistance from the idiot responsible for the biggest security breach this country has ever seen, they need to be stripped of all government contracts.

- Zady, London, 20/08/2008 23:01
Report abuse


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.