'Shambolic' BAA forced to sell Gatwick, Stansted and a Scottish airport as watchdog orders end of monopoly
Last updated at 02:41am on 21.08.08
Gatwick and Stansted airports could be sold off after a damning report attacked shambolic customer service, overcrowded facilities and appalling delays.
The Competition Commission said Spanish-owned BAA's near-monopoly of major UK airports had led to plunging standards. Breaking it up would be in the public interest.
The watchdog said BAA should sell off two of its three London airports - it also owns Heathrow - along with either Edinburgh or Glasgow.

No deal: BAA have insisted they will hang on to Heathrow
The scale of the proposals, and the humiliating criticism of BAA's poor management and chronic under-investment, delighted the company's many critics.
Passenger groups said the proposals were much needed.
Airlines which have battled with BAA over lack of capacity and high charges called them a 'major victory for passengers'.
But BAA, which also owns Southampton and Aberdeen airports, described the findings as disproportionate and flawed and warned that customer service could suffer.
The former British Airports Authority, now owned by Spanish company Ferrovial, has been fiercely criticised over the performance of its airports, particularly Heathrow.
The disastrous opening of Terminal Five this year led to hundreds of cancelled flights, and tens of thousands of passengers lost their luggage.

Target: A passenger jet landing at BAA's Gatwick airport in West Sussex
In a preliminary report, Christopher Clarke, chairman of the Competition Commission's BAA inquiry, said many failures of the last few years had been caused by the lack of competition between the London airports.
This had led to a lack of investment in runway capacity, poor customer service and a failure to spend money on 'essential operation processes'.
Mr Clarke accused BAA of a 'lack of responsiveness' to customers and blamed it for the lack of runway and terminal capacity in South-East England.

Poor service: Passengers at Gatwick Airport
The Commission called on the Civil Aviation Authority to impose tough customer service standards for passengers.
Heathrow has one of the worst records in the world for delays. In the first three months of 2008, 44 per cent of its flights were at least 15 minutes late and the average delay was 25 minutes.
The commission report cited an international survey of 'overall airport experience' by the Airports Council International.
Of the 101 airports that were examined, Heathrow was ranked 90th, Gatwick 75th and Stansted 74th.
BAA chief executive Colin Matthews said he accepted the report's concerns about poor service. He refused to comment on the future of Gatwick or Stansted but said BAA had 'no intention of selling Heathrow', its most profitable airport.
Mr Matthews added: 'We will continue to point out to the commission the many areas where we believe its analysis is flawed and its remedies would be disproportionate and counter-productive.'
Tory transport spokesman Theresa Villiers welcomed the report. 'For many months we have been calling for BAA to be broken up,' she said.
'Too often they have provided their customers with dismal levels of service. We want passengers and airlines to be able to vote with their feet.'
Airlines were also in favour of the break-up proposal.
Virgin Atlantic Airways said: 'This is a major victory for passengers. The BAA monopoly at UK airports has failed to give travellers and airlines the world-class facilities they have deserved for so long.
'Monopolies never work in the consumer's interest so it is encouraging that the commission wants to break up BAA.'
James Fremantle, of the Air Transport Users Council, said: 'These are serious failures at Heathrow and other BAA-owned airports and we are pleased something is being done about them.'
The British Airports Authority was created by Harold Wilson's Labour government in 1966 to run Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted and Prestwick airports.
When it was privatised in 1987, it was allowed to keep its monopoly over London's three main airports, with the then Tory Government arguing that a single, powerful owner was the best way to increase airport capacity.
Two years ago BAA was taken over by the Spanish Ferrovial group, which owns car parks, airports and toll roads in more than 40 countries.
The Competition Commission findings are provisional and will be challenged by BAA, but the watchdog has the power to force the company to sell its airports. A final decision will be made in April.
Reader views (11)
The government gave the go ahead to the sale of BAA a few years ago.
So who else do you sell a critical national business that involves a high level of co-ordination, dedication, logistical expertise and adherence to exacting standards. Spanish builders of course, who else.
What were they thinking ?
- Big Andy, London
Monopolies of airport ownership might be better than airline company monopolies pushing everyone else out. And we must be careful not to blame BAA for any future trade union disruption. Vested interests are able to do questionable things!
- Peter Seekings-Foster, Muildenhall, Suffolk
Isn't BAA already owned by a Spanish company called Ferrovial?
- Dave, london
Another British service to be sold off to foreign companies. Soon nothing will belong to Britain or the British.
- Jan, London
Yet again anything with the word British at the front of its title, tends to be incompetent and a rip off.
- Michael, brightlingsea england
OK. Why not sell these airports to the Saudi royal family or a Russian oligarch. In fact, why don't we let the whole world feed off the carcass that is now England. For the sake of the economy (oh, the irony) you understand.
- Janice, London
I suspect that this will lead to no real improvement as Gatwick and Stansted ocupy different market sectors to Heathrow - namely charter and low cost business compared to the major airlines like BA, Qantas and Lufthansa. Competition has not improved the utilities or the railways as often there is no real competition and they are only brought to make money for the new owners.
- Michael, London
How will this improve conditions at Heathrow?
- Alan Preen, McLean, Texas, USA
So this will provide competition and thus improve the quality of service and ease the congestion. I do not see how by forcing the sale of airports this will be achieved.
Any new owner will be faced the same capacity constraints that exist at the moment - a new runway will not be built at any of the airports for the next 7 years at least. New terminals etc require planning consent and the planning laws are not being changed - look how long it took to get permission for T5 and then how long it took to build. And there is also the simple fact that land around these airports is at a severe premium.
The airlines themselves will not move overnight from one airport to another - after all it costs money to move an airline and have any of the airlines got the money to do this.
With respect to Regional Airports and London City Airport being able to increase capacity etc that is easy. They have 1 runway that was underutilised and therefore they could increase the number of flights without building new infrastructure. Look at London City now, it has got to bursting point and wants to build new infrastructure but is faced with planning constraints etc.
If I were BAA I would sell Heathrow and keep Stansted and Gatwick, there is more chance that these will be allowed to expand than Heathrow - and at a stroke they get rid of the millstone around their neck.
- Tweed, Switzerland
This will not change very much from a customer (passenger) perspective as most people can only viably travel from one or two airports.
It would have been better to split Heathrow between 5 companies so that you can say "I don't want to fly with BA because they go from T5, but I am OK flying KLM from T4" for example.
By having each terminal owned by a different company, they could then compete for customers who then have real choice. Travelling from Berkshire to Gatwick for a flight is expensive compared to Heathrow and would negate any savings from cheaper flights there.
- Graham, Reading, England
This is great news: BAA have been a total disaster. They are a bunch of money grabbing, low-value cowboys whose customer service is staggeringly bad. The only thing wrong with the competition commission's report is that they should have gone further and forced BAA to sell more of its airports.
- Josh, london
Tonight:
9°c

New Moon is nothing if not an international advertisement for the hungry virtues of virginity and young people can’t get enough of it




