Comment: Mosley's privacy

My Account
Logout

Create an Evening Standard Account

Use your social network

Save time by using your existing account to sign in to Evening Standard

We'll never share your information or post anything to your account without your permission

Welcome! Sign in here

Use your social network

Save time by using your existing account to sign in to Evening Standard

We'll never share your information or post anything to your account without your permission

Forgot your password ?

Registration

* indicates fields that are mandatory

Email *

Password *

Confirm Password *

First name *

Surname *

Postcode *

Country *

Mobile phone number

Username *

Gender *

Year of birth *

When you sign up...

You will have access to all our online competitions, discounted offers and can post comments on our site.

You will also receive The Weekender newsletter sent every Thursday - it’s full of fantastic offers and ideas for the weekend. You can update your email preferences in your account page when you log in.

Other newsletters and emails

Homes & Property Newsletter - Yes I want to receive the weekly email with all the latest news on property in the capital

Occasionally we would also like to send you relevant emails detailing specific offers either from ourselves or carefully selected partners. If you would prefer not to receive these then please tick the appropriate boxes below. We will never pass on your details.

I do not want to receive additional offers and information from the Evening Standard

I do not want to receive additional offers and information sent by Evening Standard on behalf of carefully selected partners

Terms and Conditions

* I have read, understood and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of Evening Standard

Registration

Mail Sent for Registration Confirmation.

A confirmation email has been sent. Please activate your account by clicking on the activation link sent in your mail box.

Today's judgment in the privacy case brought by Max Mosley is being described by somelawyers as a landmark that will curb the freedom of the press. Mr Justice Eady found that the News of the World had infringed Mr Mosley's privacy with its exposure of a bondage orgy it claimed had "Nazi" overtones. Mr Mosley, head of motor sport's governing body, the FIA, successfully argued that there was no Nazi element and no public interest in his odd sexual proclivities being reported. Whether the decision will indeed inhibit the ability of journalists to embarrass public figures with undercover operations depends on the definition of public interest.

Certainly many investigations by red-top newspapers focus on alleged sexual misbehaviour by celebrities such as Premiership footballers. Today's decision looks likely to rein in such reporting. However, when newspapers expose behaviour that is illegal or dangerous, or at serious variance with the public statements of those public figures involved - a moralistic MP who has an affair, for example - then they should be able to report people's private lives. If this decision were to discourage papers from pursuing a wider range of stories involving privacy issues, that would be deeply damaging. Parliament has rightly rejected the possibility of formal privacy laws. Today's ruling must not be allowed to discourage serious investigations in the public interest.