Lawyers to explain why Jackson ended contract case with sheikh - News - Evening Standard
       

Lawyers to explain why Jackson ended contract case with sheikh

MICHAEL Jackson's lawyers will go to the High Court today to explain why the singer pulled out of his £4.7million contract case.

His legal team, led by Robert Englehart QC, must tell Mr Justice Sweeney the trial has been formally discontinued after just a handful of days in court.

The star's lawyers shook hands late last night on a settlement in principle with those representing Sheikh Abdullah, the second son of the King of Bahrain.

In a statement Jackson, 50, claimed he had been on the verge of boarding a transatlantic jet to bring him to London to give evidence this afternoon. But sources close to the case had predicted Jackson would climb down at the eleventh hour.

At first the cash-strapped former multi-millionaire had claimed to be too ill to travel. After the doctors gave him the all-clear, Jackson's lawyers subjected the sheikh to fierce cross examination in the witness box.

The singer caved in as he himself was due to face a grilling by the sheikh's QC, Bankim Thanki, over his financial affairs and personal relationship with the Arab ruler.

The court is unlikely to hear any details of the settlement. Jackson's lawyers are likely to have insisted on a confidentiality clause.

The deal marks the end of a bizarre collaboration between the star known as Wacko Jacko and the wealthy Arab sheikh.

Sheikh Abdullah bin Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa told the court last week he had been introduced over the phone by the singer's brother Jermaine. He agreed to lend Jackson $1million (£670,000) during the star's child abuse trial in California before they had met in person.

The first approach for money came from Jackson's personal assistant who asked for $30,000 (£20,000) to pay utility bills at the Neverlands ranch which the singer has now been forced to sell, the court was told.

The sheikh said the money he gave to Jackson was part of a business venture and that he wanted it back.

He invited Jackson with his children and entourage to stay in Bahrain. He lavished money on him, building a recording studio, which he believed would be used to record albums using material the sheikh had helped to write.

In court, the Bahrainian claimed they entered into a "combined rights agreement" under which the star was committed to repaying $7million (£4.7million) out of royalties earned on the albums.

Jackson has always insisted there was no valid contract and the money was a gift. He pulled out of the deal in May 2006 after 11 months and has not seen the sheikh since.

Comments

Don't Miss
Victoria Coren: My obsession with children, five proposals a week and why David and I are no power couple

Victoria Coren

David Mitchell and I are no power couple
The Glamour Awards - stars turn on the style

Glamour Awards

Stars turn on the style
Duchess of Cambridge is pretty in pink at her first Buckingham Palace garden party

Garden party

Duchess of Cambridge is pretty in pink
FIRST review of Ridley Scott's latest sci-fi blockbuster Prometheus

First review

Is Ridley Scott's Prometheus any good?
Fair-weather goths

Fair-weather goths

The sultry shades of summer darks are coming out of the shadows
London gets ready for the Diamond Jubilee - in pictures

Diamond Jubilee

London gets ready - in pictures
Dog save the Queen: Corgis surge in popularity

Dog save the Queen

Corgis surge in popularity
'He’s a better ex than he was a husband', says Boris Johnson's ex wife

A better ex than husband

We talk to Boris Johnson's ex wife
TV Baftas - in pictures

Best of the Baftas

Stars on the red, white and blue carpet
You big softie: Has Giles Coren put down his poison pen?

You big softie

Has Giles Coren put down his poison pen?