MAIL COMMENT: The 'Luddite' Prince and a GM catastrophe

How eagerly the cheerleaders for GM farming queue to attack Prince Charles for daring to warn that the reckless development of modified crops is heading for an 'environmental disaster'.

Labour politicians denounce him as a Luddite.

He's an ignoramus, sneers a Lib Dem MP.

A crop researcher accuses him of ignoring the plight of the world's poor.

News bulletins from the supposedly impartial BBC even suggest he is flirting with extremism.

But this wasn't an unconsidered outburst from a know-nothing amateur.

Charles is unusually well informed on the GM issue and has been concerned about the potential dangers for years.

Indeed, writing about them in the Mail in 1999 he warned against creating an 'Orwellian future'.

So the convictions he expresses so passionately today are the product of long reflection.

Now the Prince is challenging a Government that has always been in cahoots with America's biotech industry and is still (to its discredit) trying to foist GM crops on a reluctant nation.

The claim, of course, is that GM technology will solve Third World hunger. But Charles is contemptuous of such arguments.

He points out that the industrialisation of farming, which includes GM, is destroying the soil, polluting waterways and driving small producers off the land. And we don't have to take his word for it.

A recent UN report on food and farming, led by the top scientist at the environment department, Professor Robert Watson, came to similar conclusions.

Industrialised farming hasn't fed the world and GM technology isn't a magic wand. So why is Labour pushing so hard for it?

Why won't it listen to organic farmers who fear their land will be contaminated by GM cross-pollination? What about the danger of creating GM superweeds? Why pretend there is no threat to wildlife or the wider environment?

Prince Charles, with his extravagant lifestyle and habit of hopping into a helicopter at the drop of a hat, may not seem an entirely convincing saviour of the planet.

But he has put forward serious arguments that need to be heard. And struck a resounding chord with the public.

Missed opportunity

Bank of England governor Mervyn King: Predicts gloomy economic outlook

No spin. No special pleading. No facile optimism. The Governor of the Bank of England tries to give it straight.

And there certainly wasn't much cheer in what Mervyn King had to say yesterday. A recession can't be ruled out…inflation rising to 5 per cent . . a difficult and painful adjustment…

For countless families, things are clearly going to get worse before they get better.

Don't they have a right to ask whether the Government could have prevented at least some of the pain?

Today, the housing market is at a standstill because of the shambles over stamp duty.

We had months of delay before ministers sorted out Northern Rock.

Chancellor Darling's performance has been notable mainly for the fiasco over the 10p tax rate and the pitiful stealing of Tory clothes on inheritance tax. But suppose he had shown a touch of flair instead.

Suppose he had responded with wide-ranging measures on stamp duty, fuel duty, the 10p tax rate, mortgage availability and a relaxation in Gordon Brown's famous 'golden rules', all in one bold, reforming package.

Such a Budget would have shown decisiveness, given some stimulus to our ailing economy and might even have encouraged business confidence.

Wouldn't that have been better by far than all the counter-productive hints of what the hapless Mr Darling might or might not do when Parliament eventually returns in the autumn?