Why must Ken take the side of these holy bigots?

The report is finished, but it has been sat on for weeks. A source in the Mayor's office told me it could never be published because it's "libellous" and "plain daft".

I'm sure it's both, but I think a second contact was closer to the mark when he said publication would reveal how far out to the Right Livingstone has moved.

If you find the idea of an alleged socialist flirting with the far Right novel, you haven't been paying attention since 9/11.

Livingstone is just an extreme example of a shameful turn in liberal-Left politics. He's embraced the Muslim Council of Britain, which essentially consists of members of the Muslim Brotherhood and Jamaat-i-Islami, whose best friends wouldn't call them progressive.

For instance, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood's chief theologian, whom Livingstone welcomed to London, believes that death should be the punishment for Muslims who decide to convert to another religion. He discusses whether homosexuals should also be murdered, and supports female genital mutilation, wife-beating and the killing of Israeli children.

To say that criticism of such extremism is racist is like saying criticism of the BNP is "anti-white". But this is the trick Livingstone's people have tried to pull.

They have turned their backs on Muslim liberals, feminists and socialists in Britain and beyond and decided that criticism of the MCB is "Islamophobic" as is criticism of Iran.

British Muslims who loathe the Muslim Brotherhood and the Muslim Iranians in London who loathe what the mullahs have done to their country are, according to Livingstone's demonology, "Islamophobes", without realising it.

Tellingly, Livingstone's report directs its fire at serious investigative journalists rather than real racists. It condemns Channel 4, the Observer and New Statesman for publishing leaks from a Whitehall mole which showed how the Foreign Office was appeasing radical Islam. The revelations helped persuade the Labour government to change course, dump the MCB and support Muslims who supported liberal values.

This wise U-turn was spoilt only by the absurdity of the attorney general allowing Derek Pasquill, the civil servant accused of leaking the documents, to face an Official Secrets Act prosecution.

But let's stick with the absurdity of Livingstone today. His suppressed report strikes me as a clumsy attempt to bring the MCB back into the fold by accusing the critics of bigots of being bigots themselves.

There are more Labour supporters in London than he may realise who are sick of his betrayals. Opposition parties don't seem to know it, but we will vote against Livingstone with relish.