Chambers loses Beijing Games battle

Mr Justice Mackay refused to grant an injunction to temporarily suspend a lifetime ban on Chambers competing at the Olympics. The ban was imposed by the British Olympic Association (BOA) because of his self-confessed past use of performance-enhancing drugs.

The judge issued his ruling after spending Thursday listening to the conflicting arguments over the athlete's attempt to win an injunction suspending the bylaw before a full trial of the issues in March next year.

Mr Justice Mackay returned to the London court on Friday morning to give his ruling to a packed courtroom and the athlete himself.

The judge said: "Many people both inside and outside sport would see this bylaw as unlawful. In my judgment it would take a much better case than the claimant has presented to persuade me to overturn the status quo at this stage and compel his selection for the Games."

During the hearing on Thursday, the judge had commented to Jonathan Crystal, representing Chambers: "The reality is that you are saying 'put him on the plane'."

Mr Crystal, an expert in sports law, had told the judge that banning Chambers could deprive Britain of its best chance of winning a medal in the 100m in Beijing next month.

Chambers, 30, served a two-year suspension for using the designer steroid tetrahydrogestrinone (THG). Mr Crystal said the BOA bylaw was unfair, contrary to competition law and an unreasonable restraint on trade.

Chambers had already qualified to compete in the Olympic team after winning the 100m at the Olympic athletics trials in Birmingham last Saturday and setting his best time of the year of 10 seconds.

David Pannick QC, representing the BOA, had told the judge that Chambers "cannot show that sportsmen and women are significantly restrained in their trade by the bylaw which only concerns eligibility for an amateur event, which takes place once every four years and for which there is no prize money".