MoD 'juggled' project budgets - News in brief - Evening Standard
       

MoD 'juggled' project budgets

The Ministry of Defence has moved £1 billion off the bill for major equipment projects over the past two years by reallocating the sums on to other budgets, an MPs' report found.

The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee said Parliament was not being given the full picture of the expense of the massive purchases as a result of the practice, which may force other parts of the MoD to cut back on other activities to balance their books.

It accused the MoD of "juggling its budgets" because it is struggling to afford all the equipment it wants to buy.

The report said that a "conspiracy of optimism" in the MoD and the defence industry led to unrealistically low estimates of the cost of major pieces of kit, which have to be revised upwards during production.

The total forecast cost of the 19 largest military projects - not counting the purchase of Typhoon aircraft for the RAF, details of which are excluded on grounds of commercial sensitivity - now stands at £28 billion, some 11% up from the expected price-tag when the main investment decision was taken, the report found.

The committee was also critical of the MoD's slow decision-making in major procurement projects, such as the Royal Navy's two new aircraft carriers, which were approved after five and a half years' consideration despite being crucial to the viability of the UK's shipbuilding industry. And it warned that a decision to cut the number of munitions being ordered for a new guided multiple launch rocket system created a risk that frontline troops could go short of ammunition.

Despite a series of reforms designed to enhance the procurement process and cut cost and time over-runs, the MoD seemed "unable to bring about lasting improvements", the committee's Major Projects Report found.

Chairman Edward Leigh said: "The Ministry of Defence is trying to persuade Parliament that the forecast costs of major defence equipment projects are under control - by moving expenditure from those projects to other defence budgets.

"This is not acceptable: it diminishes Parliamentary accountability; and the transferred costs will doubtless have resulted in those budget holders who have taken them on having to cut their own defence activities.

"It is a well-established principle that delaying major equipment projects leads to higher costs in the long run. The Department should identify lessons from the five and a half years it took to award the contract for the Royal Navy's two new aircraft carriers."

News in brief in Pictures

Don't Miss
Rock star: Erin Wasson

Rock star

Erin Wasson is the ultimate anti-supermodel
Maybe it’s because she’s a Londoner … Happy anniversary, Ma’am

Happy anniversary

The monarchy has become stronger and more respected in the past 60 years
Victoria Coren: My obsession with children, five proposals a week and why David and I are no power couple

Victoria Coren

David Mitchell and I are no power couple
The Royal Academy of Arts Summer Exhibition preview party

Summer party

Stars at the The Royal Academy of Arts
London gets ready for the Diamond Jubilee - in pictures

Diamond Jubilee

London gets ready - in pictures
The Glamour Awards - stars turn on the style

Glamour Awards

Stars turn on the style
Duchess of Cambridge is pretty in pink at her first Buckingham Palace garden party

Garden party

Duchess of Cambridge is pretty in pink
FIRST review of Ridley Scott's latest sci-fi blockbuster Prometheus

First review

Is Ridley Scott's Prometheus any good?
Fair-weather goths

Fair-weather goths

The sultry shades of summer darks are coming out of the shadows
Dog save the Queen: Corgis surge in popularity

Dog save the Queen

Corgis surge in popularity