Peers warn over detention plan - News in brief - Evening Standard
       

Peers warn over detention plan

Controversial plans to extend terror detention to 42 days could undermine the independence of judges and lead to the collapse of trials, a cross-party committee of peers has warned.

The committee said the proposed procedures, giving both Houses of Parliament a vote on whether to allow an extension in the pre-charge time limit beyond 28 days, were "muddled" and "ill-advised".

The Lords Constitution Select Committee said the power, contained in the Counter-Terrorism Bill, "arguably risks undermining the rights of fair trial for the individuals concerned".

Gordon Brown faced the stiffest test of his parliamentary authority in a key vote when the Bill was debated by MPs. His majority was slashed to just nine following a backbench rebellion and he was effectively forced to rely on the votes of the Democratic Unionist Party to get the measure through the Commons.

The Bill will face stiff opposition in the Lords when Parliament returns from the summer recess, and the report will give further ammunition to critics of the proposals.

Under the legislation, MPs and Peers would vote on whether to grant a temporary "reserve power" for the Home Secretary, allowing courts to authorise detention for up to 42 days if there was an operational need.

Although the reserve power order would not be specifically about an individual case, politicians would "have to tread a tightrope" to avoid prejudicing any trial, the peers said. Their report said: "We are unconvinced that the Government have properly thought through this aspect of their proposed scheme."

The committee also said it was concerned that a judge could have to decide whether to extend a suspect's detention within hours of a "highly politically charged debate" in Parliament. The committee's report said: "There is a risk that this will be perceived to undermine the independence of the judiciary."

The Government's desire to increase democratic accountability was understandable, but risked "conflating the roles of Parliament and the judiciary, which would be quite inappropriate".

The peers added: "Far from being a system of checks and balances, this is a recipe for confusion that places on Parliament tasks that it cannot effectively fulfil and arguably risks undermining the rights of fair trial for the individuals concerned."

News in brief in Pictures

Don't Miss
Rock star: Erin Wasson

Rock star

Erin Wasson is the ultimate anti-supermodel
Maybe it’s because she’s a Londoner … Happy anniversary, Ma’am

Happy anniversary

The monarchy has become stronger and more respected in the past 60 years
Victoria Coren: My obsession with children, five proposals a week and why David and I are no power couple

Victoria Coren

David Mitchell and I are no power couple
The Royal Academy of Arts Summer Exhibition preview party

Summer party

Stars at the The Royal Academy of Arts
London gets ready for the Diamond Jubilee - in pictures

Diamond Jubilee

London gets ready - in pictures
The Glamour Awards - stars turn on the style

Glamour Awards

Stars turn on the style
Duchess of Cambridge is pretty in pink at her first Buckingham Palace garden party

Garden party

Duchess of Cambridge is pretty in pink
FIRST review of Ridley Scott's latest sci-fi blockbuster Prometheus

First review

Is Ridley Scott's Prometheus any good?
Fair-weather goths

Fair-weather goths

The sultry shades of summer darks are coming out of the shadows
Dog save the Queen: Corgis surge in popularity

Dog save the Queen

Corgis surge in popularity