Safety fears over arthritis drugs - News in brief - Evening Standard
       

Safety fears over arthritis drugs

Further fears about the safety of some pain-killing arthritis drugs have been raised after new evidence emerged of life-threatening risks associated with one of the medicines.

A worldwide study involving 2,000 patients found rofecoxib "substantially" increased the chances of dying or suffering a non-fatal stroke or heart attack even a year after stopping treatment.

Sold under the brand name Vioxx, the drug was dramatically withdrawn from the world market in 2004 by manufacturers Merck & Co after research showed it doubled the risk of heart attacks.

The Merck-funded research published in an early online edition of The Lancet medical journal followed up the original study that led to the Vioxx scare.

A total of 2,587 patients took part in the APPROVe (Adenomatous Polyp Prevention On Vioxx) study which looked at whether Vioxx could reduce the risk of bowel polyps. The trial was stopped early in September 2004 when the increased risk of cardiovascular events linked to Vioxx was discovered.

The new study looked back at the progress of around 2,000 of these patients for a year after they ceased taking the drug. Participants in APPROVe were randomly assigned either to be treated with Vioxx or to receive a dummy placebo drug.

After the follow up, it was found that the risk of death or non-fatal heart attacks or strokes was 79% higher in the Vioxx group than the placebo group.

Over the 12-month period after treatment was stopped, Vioxx patients had twice the risk of heart attack or stroke of those who took the placebo. Their relative risk of death was 31% higher.

A spokeswoman for the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which licences medical treatments, said: "The MHRA will carefully review the latest evidence relating to the safety of this important class of medicines, and will seek advice from the Commission on Human Medicines if necessary. The ideal anti-inflammatory prescribing choice will vary from patient to patient, depending on individual risk factors, therapeutic response and patient preference. Prescribers need to weigh up all the risks (of which gastrointestinal and cardiovascular are the most important).

"Patients should use the lowest effective dose, and the shortest duration of therapy necessary to control symptoms. Adherence to these principles should ensure that the risks are minimised, and for the vast majority of patients the overall risks are outweighed by the benefits of anti-inflammatory treatment. Any patient who is concerned about their current anti-inflammatory treatment should speak to their pharmacist, doctor or nurse at their next routine appointment."

News in brief in Pictures

Don't Miss
Rock star: Erin Wasson

Rock star

Erin Wasson is the ultimate anti-supermodel
Maybe it’s because she’s a Londoner … Happy anniversary, Ma’am

Happy anniversary

The monarchy has become stronger and more respected in the past 60 years
Victoria Coren: My obsession with children, five proposals a week and why David and I are no power couple

Victoria Coren

David Mitchell and I are no power couple
The Royal Academy of Arts Summer Exhibition preview party

Summer party

Stars at the The Royal Academy of Arts
London gets ready for the Diamond Jubilee - in pictures

Diamond Jubilee

London gets ready - in pictures
The Glamour Awards - stars turn on the style

Glamour Awards

Stars turn on the style
Duchess of Cambridge is pretty in pink at her first Buckingham Palace garden party

Garden party

Duchess of Cambridge is pretty in pink
FIRST review of Ridley Scott's latest sci-fi blockbuster Prometheus

First review

Is Ridley Scott's Prometheus any good?
Fair-weather goths

Fair-weather goths

The sultry shades of summer darks are coming out of the shadows
Dog save the Queen: Corgis surge in popularity

Dog save the Queen

Corgis surge in popularity