Weather Tonight: 10°c Heavy rain Morning: 11°c Light rain

Critics' Choice

Film

Andrew O'Hagan

quoteAn awesome and ridiculous film that leaves you thrilled beyond the point of your natural endurancequote

Andrew O'Hagan 2012 Theatre

Fiona Mountford

quoteThe show has suddenly become quite wonderful, and the galvanising factor is the terrific stage debut of Melanie Cquote

Fiona Mountford Blood Brothers Music

John Aizlewood

quoteThe British pop music industry may be eating itself but if Muse are the pick of what it can offer the world in 2010 then British music is in rude health indeedquote

John Aizlewood Muse

Reader reviews

Theatre

Rachel Dalziel

quoteI was smitten by both Gilberts enormous luxuriant moustache and the intelligence and nuance of this highly entertaining playquote

Gilbert Is Dead Restaurants

Raja, London

quoteI totally recommend Babbo to anyone who is looking for really good and traditional Italian foodquote

Babbo Music

Katy, London

quoteAlways been a fan but never seen them live. I was ecstatic to be part of this epic event. WOW!quote

Muse

Cracking reads

By Joseph Connolly, Evening Standard Last updated at 00:00am on 19.05.03

 Add your view

 

When is the last time you held in your hand a brand new book and declared it to be beautiful? Not a finely morocco-bound Victorian tome with gilt-edged India paper leaves, each page made noble by the sort of bold and generous typography that simply takes your breath away; not even a solidly pleasing cloth-bound volume with gold leaf and contrasting lozenges of colour beneath a striking and handpainted dustwrapper from the last golden age of British book production, the 1960s. No, cast aside thoughts of such bygone beauties and concentrate upon what is on offer in Waterstone's, Books Etc and WHSmith.

Setting aside magnificent art books and the sometimes quite extraordinary over-production of commercial "jackets", the heft, boards, paper and design of a typical new novel or biography are decent and serviceable, certainly, but beautiful - no. Why should this be? Is it merely economics? A lack of aesthetic excellence is often blamed upon this quite nebulous excuse and on the declining standards of the book-buying public, which leave publishers under no obligation to make their books any better than they are.

Collectors like me know that modern publishers have no interest whatever in a book following its sale. They are not in the business of supplying museum-quality heirlooms for a future generation. Indeed, most publishers and many royalty-conscious authors would quite welcome the invention of the book that would self-destruct the moment the initial purchaser reached the words "The End".

I once asked Dr DG Hessayon - author of the phenomenally bestselling Garden Expert series - how it could be that his old titles continued to sell in their millions each and every year. "Simple," he replied, quite deadpan: "cheap bindings".

It was not always thus. Time was when a gentleman's library was a highly visible display of his taste and learning, the look of his collection an extension of the peerless decor.

Today, collectors of contemporary first editions had better ensure that the books are never placed close to radiators or in direct sunlight, if their investment is not to turn into a handful of dust. It is possible to preserve modern books in dust-free and temperature-controlled rooms; they won't disintegrate, but the steady yellowing of pages that become ever more brittle is inevitable, even in the best-kept collection.

From a strictly production point of view, trade paperbacks these days are pretty much perfectly formed and, incidentally, extremely good value - but all one has to do is compare the best books of today with an average product of 40 years ago to see how badly things have slipped.

In the 1960s, all the great literary houses - Jonathan Cape, Chatto & Windus, Oxford University Press, the much lamented Bodley Head - were producing well printed and bound standards, but none so wonderfully as Faber and Faber. Faber was fortunate in having a genius as their resident art director - Berthold Wolpe, designer of the quite superb Albertus typeface, and single-handed artist to most of the output.

Brave blocks of colour, offset by strong and vigorous type and handpainted calligraphy - and beneath, heavy boards covered in cloth, the spines alive with contrast and gilding. No one, with the venerable exception of Everyman, uses cloth any more - and spines now very meanly record the title and author as if for mere clinical reference than any sort of display.

Even the half-crown Penguin was a thing of aesthetic beauty, its inherent floppiness and the instantly recognisable orange bands striped by black serving to denote quality, while provoking a need to possess. Today, paperback covers sport all manner of embossing, metallic foils, spot varnishing, but artistically they are generally a bit of a mess. It may be no coincidence that what were once the best-designed colophons are now mostly owned by an offshore corporation.

Over the past 20 years or so the condition of books - whether by design or accident - has improved. In the 1980s blotchy paper was yellowing even as the books languished in the shops; over-laminated jackets crazed and curled, and boards were far too flimsy and routinely warped.

The two signs of the time were title pages so thin you did not need to turn over to read the copyright details on the reverse, and a new sort of paperback binding, much touted by the trade, which comprised individual sheets of paper (as opposed to stitched and folded "signatures") glued directly to the squared-off spine.

The crack that was required to prise open such a book ensured the immediate detachment of some of the leaves, and then - when the glue became brittle - most of the rest. Enthusiastic publishers, with a wholly straight face, christened this nightmare, the "perfect" binding.

So is the disintegration of books a matter of economics, or simple negligence? Publishers, if cornered, will offer to produce a cloth-bound book with stitching and ribboned headers and fine, thick paper, provided that you, the customer, are prepared to stump up 50 quid a whack.

At which point we, the bibliophiles, point to America, where book production is in another league. They have the sort of bindings that would survive a fall from the Empire State, and an obsession with acid-free papers (these ensuring no yellowing or decay).

American books often list the provenance of the trees from which the paper was made, and all sorts of typographical information - rather like their newsier sorts of wine labels. What is more, American books are famous for being cheaper. At the mention of which, British publishers will purse the lip and shuffle the feet a fair deal and resort to "economics".

Somehow, the Everyman Library seems to manage it with ease - proper paper, cloth bindings, restrained (though admittedly dullish) dustwrappers, and all as cheap as chips. Admittedly, they're not crippled by the need to dole out huge advances to the likes of Charlotte Bronte, but there is a lesson here to be learned.

Of course, modern books look nice, but then so, momentarily, do clothes from TopShop - we sorely need to get back into publishing more of the style and quality of Savile Row.

Former antiquarian bookseller Joseph Connolly has a new novel out this week, The Works, published by Faber.


Bookmark and Share
 
 

Reader views (0)

 Add your view

No comments have so far been submitted.


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.


 
 
 
London's Weather
Tonight
Heavy rain
10°c
Morning
Light rain
11°c
5 day forecast
 




 
 

Daily Mail Mail on Sunday Travel Mail This is Money Metro

Loot | Jobsite | Homes & property | London jobs | FindaProperty.com | Primelocation.com | Educate London | Holiday Villas