Morning:
18°c
Johnny Depp has become, in his young middle age, like a star of the movies’ golden period
The full story of the rescue operation was told as it emerged that plastic windows fitted at the block two years ago melted in the intense heat, effectively acting as fuel for the blaze
More...
Brown seeks to gag fans' group
By Raoul Simons, Evening Standard Last updated at 00:00am on 06.05.04West Ham today threatened to sue shareholders' group Whistle for aggravated damages if they continue to make "untrue and defamatory" allegations about the club.
Chairman Terry Brown is furious with a dossier of 180 questions issued by Whistle which implied financial incompetence by directors.
Brown has instructed City law firm Herbert Smith to start a libel action against the 1,000-strong group, who have been warned against making further criticisms.
In a strongly worded letter, West Ham's solicitors wrote: "We demand that you immediately desist from making any further untrue and defamatory remarks regarding our client.
"If you fail to provide an undertaking confirming that you will do so, any further such statements will be used to support a claim for aggravated damages in the proceedings our client is going to initiate against you." In their dossier, Whistle raised concerns about a possible increase in the club's debts, despite the sale of £27million worth of star players.
This has been emphatically denied by West Ham, whose lawyers said: "In fact, the debt burden will have significantly decreased from last year."
Whistle also claimed that West Ham's board have resisted approaches from "serious parties" for a much-needed cash injection. Again the club refute this allegation, with Herbert Smith saying: "There have been no serious offers of fresh investment."
Whistle are concerned that West Ham's precarious financial position will force more player sales in the summer - even if they are promoted to the Premiership. Not true, say the club's lawyers, who claim "such an allegation is defamatory and highly damaging".
The club are also upset that a number of Whistle's questions "imply misconduct" on the part of West Ham by raising issues about preferential corporate hospitality and links with freemasonry.
Whistle, who claim to know of City investors prepared to pump £20m into the club, are understood to be determined to continue with their campaign to oust Brown regardless of the legal action.
The group's aim is to seize control of the club and appoint a new management structure.
But their attempts have floundered as the existing directors retain the support of the club's major shareholders, the Warner and Cearns families.
Whistle's dossier, delivered to the club last week, was designed to cause maximum embarrassment.
Brown has since attacked the timing of the campaign, which coincides with West Ham's play-off bid. Alan Pardew's side must avoid losing by four goals at Wigan on Sunday to guarantee a top-six finish.
