Saints consider Hartley options - Sport in brief - Evening Standard
       

Saints consider Hartley options

Northampton say they will "look at every option available" after their England World Cup prospect Dylan Hartley received a 26-week ban for gouging.

Saints have until 5pm on Wednesday to lodge an appeal after 21-year-old Hartley was found guilty of illegally making contact with the eye or eye areas of Wasps forwards James Haskell and Jonny O'Connor during a Guinness Premiership game earlier this month.

Northampton chief executive Allan Robson said: "We are obviously disappointed that Dylan has received this suspension in a crucial week for the club. While we accept the findings of the panel, we will of course look at every option available to us."

Hartley's suspension - thought to be the longest handed out to a top-flight English player since Kevin Yates landed a six-month ban for biting in 1998 - will sideline him from rugby until October 17, just three days before the World Cup final in Paris.

Hartley was reported by independent citing officer Alan Mansell, although he was found not guilty of an identical charge in relation to a third Wasps player, England star Joe Worsley.

In addition to missing Saints' Premiership relegation clash against London Irish on Saturday, he must also sit out England's two-Test South Africa tour in May and June, three World Cup warm-up games during August and the Webb Ellis Trophy defence during the autumn.

RFU disciplinary officer Jeff Blackett, who chaired Hartley's hearing, said: "Contact with an opponent's eyes is a serious offence because of the vulnerability of the area and risk of permanent injury.

"It is often the result of an insidious act and is one of the most abhorred by rugby players. Serious offences such as these - colloquially known as gouging - carry substantial punishment to protect players, deter others and remove culprits from the game to ensure they learn the appropriate lesson.

"The offence against Haskell was at the top end entry point which carries a sanction of between 24 weeks and three years. We believe the appropriate entry point for this was 30 weeks, which we reduced to 26 after taking into account his good character, youth and inexperience.

"We upheld the citing for the offence against O'Connor, but adjudged that no further penalty was necessary."

Sport in brief in Pictures

Don't Miss
TV Baftas - in pictures

Best of the Baftas

Stars on the red, white and blue carpet
What makes Chelsea and Arsenal target Eden Hazard tick?

Hazard warning

What makes Chelsea and Arsenal target Eden Hazard tick?
You big softie: Has Giles Coren put down his poison pen?

You big softie

Has Giles Coren put down his poison pen?
Pop star Paloma Faith, former Labour minister and Tory blogger back gay marriage video

Gay marriage

Pop star, former Labour minister and Tory blogger back gay marriage video
Promethipedia: the lowdown on Ridley Scott's new blockbuster Prometheus

Promethipedia

The lowdown on Ridley Scott's new blockbuster Prometheus
Prints charming: patterned trousers for summer

Prints charming

Patterned trousers for summer
Bob Geldof on grandchildren, activism and the state of music

Grandpa Bob

Bob Geldof on grandchildren, activism and the state of music
The Middletan: Kate Middleton has the most requested tan in London

The Middletan

Kate Middleton has the most requested tan in London
Amy Childs bares all like Britney

Dare to bare

Amy Childs vajazzles like Britney
Trip the bright fantastic - in vertiginous neon

Fashion

Trip the bright fantastic - in vertiginous neon