Mack knifing will change Morgan Stanley
11 Sep 2009The collapse of Lehman Brothers one year ago claimed another scalp last night, when Wall Street titan John Mack quit as the chief executive of Morgan Stanley.
An archetypal investment banker regarded as smooth and ruthless in equal measure, Mack is being replaced by a man whose background is in wealth management - a significant shift of emphasis.
James Gorman, a 51-year-old Australian, denies that Morgan will move away from capital markets and investment banking.
But analysts say his experience is indicative of a new atmosphere post-Lehman. Formerly head of private client business at Merrill Lynch, Gorman was the bank's co-president for global wealth management until yesterday.
Bill Fitzpatrick, an analyst for Optique Capital Management in the US, said: "All these financial institutions are going to replace their head honchos with someone with a background in a business with a more predictable, consistent revenue stream."
Mack will stay on as chairman. He could have kept the top job for longer, according to American reports, but indicated that steering the company through the Lehman Brothers debacle had left him shattered. Critics say he lost his nerve and reigned in traders at a time when arch-rival Goldman Sachs was willing to ramp up risk and chase trading profits with venom.
Mack's history with Morgan goes back decades. In 1997, he led the merger with credit card company Dean Witter, a huge deal at the time that sparked consolidation among the top banks, leading to the creation of today's "too big to fail" behemoths.
He was ousted after a power struggle with then chief executive Philip Purcell but returned in 2005. The top London Morgan executive is now Walid Chammah, who runs the investment banking arm and becomes chairman of Morgan Stanley International.
He is said to have ruled himself out of the very top job by declining to move from his South Kensington home.
Reader views (2)
The Dean Witter business was the problem with chronic underperformance. Guess who ran Dean Witter? Not John Mack! The fact is GS were better risk managers and got out of Mortgage backed securities in late 2006, long before the others and so were better poised to take advantage of the ensuing chaos. The ourchase of the Smith barney business was purely opporttunistic with Citi selling its crown jewels to stay afloat, this was never going to be sold if the Citi balance sheet wasn't such a total mess.
- James Macleod Ritchie, Oyster Bay Cove, 13/10/2009 16:22
Report abuse
About time! His tenure as CEO has been an absymal failure!
Since he took over in 2005 the stock price is down 35%! he decided that he wanted the bank to compete with Goldman Sachs and be more open to risk and increase its exposure in the investment banking sector and reduce its retail brokerage influence; since then Goldman Sachs's stock is up 71% since 2005 and three months ago Morgan Stanley bought Citi Smith Barney to boost exposure in the retail brokerage sector!
- Phil Purcell, New York, USA, 13/10/2009 15:22
Report abuse
Afternoon:
10°c







