Weather Tonight: 4°c Partly Cloudy Night Morning: 8°c Cloudy

Mayor

HEADLINES:

Comment: Ken's modest transport plan

Evening Standard
10.03.08

Transport is one of the two great issues - the other being crime - that dominate the mayoral election. Today the Mayor, Ken Livingstone, delivers his transport manifesto, central to his claim for a third term. It contains much that has already been trailed - the £25 charge on high-emissions cars, £60 million a year for improving the cycle network and the extension of the Oyster card to suburban overground railways. And there are some catchy ideas, such as a Paris-style bike hire system.

But there is no prospect that the congestion charge may be fine-tuned: it will remain the blunt instrument that it is now. Much of Mr Livingstone's energies are focused on his chief opponent, Boris Johnson, and the costing of his plan to introduce a modern Routemaster bus with conductors - although the public may decide that a new Routemaster is well worth the cost.

Mr Livingstone's record on transport is solid - but his best ideas came early on. He was right to fight Gordon Brown on his disastrous PPP plans for the Tube, and his plan for Transport for London to take over the work of the failed Metronet consortium is probably now the least-bad solution. He has greatly enlarged the bus fleet, though at considerable cost. The original congestion charge was a brave initiative - although its westward extension is quite another matter, while traffic speeds are now at pre-charge levels again, and likely to get worse as a result of Mr Livingstone scrapping the charge for some small cars. Meanwhile, there has also been an inordinate increase in cash fares on both Tube and buses.

But what is remarkable is the degree of consensus on transport between the main mayoral candidates - on the C-charge, for instance. Indeed, as Andrew Gilligan points out, the consensus includes one proposal which should never have seen the light of day - the pedestrianisation of Oxford Street and the replacement of buses with a tram line. This would be a disaster, given that Oxford Street is the great eastwest axis of London.

Mr Livingstone's manifesto is thus a promise of more of the same. With London's traffic slowly seizing up, and little visible improvement to the Tube and suburban rail, that may not be a thrilling prospect. But to date, none of his main rivals have offered any serious alternative.

Reader views (1)

 Add your view

It is wrong to point out the rise in cash fares on the buses. These are deliberately high in order to coax people into Oyster Migration. Buses are actually cheaper than they were in 2000 and a single bus fare of 90p is considerably cheaper than down the road in Brighton, where it can cost £1.70 for a single journey.

Also, surbuban rail hasn't been within Ken's remit. All that is changing with London Overground, a project that really does have the chance to improve things. Already, manned stations and refurbishment shows that with more care and attention than the private companies gave, surburban rail can become a key transport artery.

- Sam Cullen, London, UK


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.


 

Don't Miss
  • Berlin Wall

    Sex, lies and the Stasi

    On this day in 1989 the Berlin Wall was finally breached, ending the reign of East Germany’s feared security service. Here Anne McElvoy, who spent much of the Eighties in the city, recalls her encounters with the spooks
  • George Pringle

    The geeky-girl solo artists descending on the music scene

    Kookiness is what sells music these days and these opinionated artists have it in spades, says Jasmine Gardner
London's Weather
Tonight
Partly Cloudy Night
4°c
Morning
Cloudy
8°c
5 day forecast