Weather Afternoon: 10°c Sunny spells Tonight: 4°c Partly Cloudy Night

Mayor

Planned 800-flat development in Victoria
Approved: the planned 800-flat development in Victoria

Ken broke affordable homes rule over towers

Paul Waugh, Deputy Political Editor
3 Apr 2008


Ken Livingstone was accused of "rank hypocrisy" over his cheap homes policy today after it emerged he had personally agreed to a huge residential development.

Despite the Mayor's own target that 50 per cent of new homes in London should be "affordable", not one of the 800 flats in Victoria was earmarked as low-cost.

The Evening Standard has discovered he stood to get £200 million from developers for his transport budget if he approved two 40-storey towers. City Hall documents show his planners backed the proposal for the blocks, partly because developers Land Securities were offering huge sums to be spent on upgrading Victoria Tube station.

The Mayor is also facing claims he misled Londoners after he declared this week he had "no idea" why the Victoria plan lacked cheap housing. He stated "it's not a scheme that's come to me".

But Standard reporters have discovered he personally approved the scheme last November after GLA's planners gave it the green light.

In a letter to Westminster City Council, the GLA's head of planning Giles Dolphin stated: "The Mayor has concluded that the principle of the redevelopment is acceptable."

The GLA makes clear City Hall decided the lack of affordable housing was compensated for by the funding for Transport for London. "None of these units will be affordable," it states.

"The proposal does include £111.7 million towards transport infrastructure works (£217.9million after on-costs such as fees, contingencies-cost inflation and finance are added), which the applicant argues off-sets the requirement for affordable housing. These works cannot currently be funded via public sector means. It is therefore accepted that additional monies created by the development are targeted for transport purposes."

Tory-run Westminster opposed the proposals because they lacked affordable housing. It was also unconvinced by the Tube upgrade.

As well as breaching the Mayor's "affordable homes" rules, the flats would breach his guidelines on the proportion of family homes and density - and affect views of Buckingham Palace and St Paul's.

However, City Hall planners considered the blocks "beautiful additions" to London's skyline. The GLA also backed the idea of demolishing Victoria bus station - partly because bendy buses "have operational difficulties" there.

In a key plank of his election bid, Mr Livingstone this week accused Tories of "betraying" families.

But his Tory rival Boris Johnson said the Victoria scandal showed the Mayor had been caught red handed and blew a hole in his claims to be on the side of the poor. He said: "It's utter and rank hypocrisy and an absolute travesty of the truth."

Angela Harvey, Westminster's Cabinet member for housing, said: "The GLA report on the Victoria development makes it absolutely clear the Mayor decided in favour of luxury flats instead of affordable housing he says he wants.

"Unlike Ken, we want affordable homes for over 300 local families."

The Mayor's office did not respond. Mr Livingstone said his target was for London as a whole.

Reader views (7)

 Add your view

How typical of Ken to be economical with the truth so that the planning application for tower blocks goes through. I bet he doesn't have to live in the shadow of the high rise Tower blocks.
In Walthamstow despite the fact that this is a suburban area largely made up of Victorian terrace houses Ken is forcing plans through for tower blocks on any available site. My local streets, a quiet residential area, are faced with 400+ properties being build in a serried row of high rises culminating in one of 22 storeys on a site of only 1.4 hectares.
He is overstayed his time at City Hall and needs to go.

- Helen, London E17, 04/04/2008 23:52
Report abuse

Ken lied? It's like reporting the sun came up this morning.

- Rm, London, UK, 04/04/2008 01:36
Report abuse

Given Westminster's history of selling off council-owned homes to (hopefully) Conservative voters, their concern about the lack of affordable homes rings more than a bit hollow.

- Tonyb, Twickenham, 03/04/2008 17:21
Report abuse

ken should be in The Apprentice...

- Joe C, London, 03/04/2008 15:19
Report abuse

Shock, horror, Ken's looks to be corrupt, who'd have thought it? That halo floating over his head had me fooled.

- Ken Yastickit, London, 03/04/2008 14:18
Report abuse

On the basis of this article alone Ken Livingstone should resign immediately!

- Fraser, Telford Park, 03/04/2008 14:14
Report abuse

Lies, lies, and even more lies keep spewing from Kenny.

You can tell when Ken lies, his lips move.

- Neal Grinsell, London, 03/04/2008 12:54
Report abuse


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.


 

Don't Miss
  • London Gateway

    Supersize superport: London Gateway

    London Gateway, the £1.5bn container port under construction on the Thames at Thurrock, will have capacity to unload six of the world's largest ships at one time and have as much impact on the capital as a new airport or half a dozen Westfield shopping centres
  • Matthew Williamson

    One stylish affair: Matthew Williamson

    With London Fashion Week kicking off on Friday, British designer Matthew Williamson tells Rosamund Urwin about breaking up with his ex, post-show partying and his new model man
London's Weather
Afternoon
Sunny spells
10°c
Tonight
Partly Cloudy Night
4°c
5 day forecast