Weather Tonight: 4°c Partly Cloudy Night Morning: 8°c Cloudy

Mayor

Ken Livingstone
Off message: Ken Livingstone faces questions about fare rises

Livingstone did cover up fare rises, say advisers

Andrew Gilligan
25 Apr 2008


Ken Livingstone's top advisers agreed that the Mayor misled Londoners when he denied planning big post-election bus and Tube fare increases - and are still working on the basis that fares will go up.

The Evening Standard revealed yesterday how on 24 October last year Mr Livingstone secretly approved a TfL business plan for above-inflation fare increases in both 2009 and 2010.

Six days later, on 30 October, he claimed the exact opposite in public - saying that fares would be frozen in real terms. The statement, which he repeated at least three times over successive-weeks, caused horror inside TfL, with the Transport Commissioner, Peter Hendy, accusing Mr Livingstone of telling "stories".

After the Mayor's statements about fares, TfL secretly rewrote its business plan to delete all mention of fare increases from the published version. It now claims fares will not have to rise.

Mr Livingstone yesterday claimed he and his advisers simply changed their minds and decided to freeze fares in real terms. He told BBC London: "[TfL] submit a business plan and once I've read it I then determine what our fares strategy will be ... I analyse it with my officials who are not TfL people, bear down, and say do you [TfL] really need all this money?"

However, today the Standard can reveal that further emails expose these statements as false - and the analysis of Mr Livingstone's own officials was that fares probably did have to rise above inflation. In an email leaked to us, the Mayor's second most important adviser, his economic and business policy director John Ross, says it will only be possible to hold fares down if revenue exceeds expectations.

The email, dated 14 November, is to Mr Hendy and is copied to the Mayor's chief of staff, Simon Fletcher.

Mr Ross says "the Mayor must by law set a balanced budget for Transport for London". If fare revenue was higher than TfL expected, he says, "it will be possible to balance the budget by keeping the fare increases down to RPI [the retail price index used to measure inflation]".

However, "if fares did not exceed projections, TfL has drawn up a variant that would allow the budget to be balanced at broadly RPI plus 1".

Later emails between Mr Hendy and TfL's finance director, Steve Allen, confirm Mr Ross's view. Even as the Mayor was claiming in public that he would insist on inflation-only rises, Mr Hendy was reporting the exact opposite: "John Ross told me that he 'wouldn't insist' on RPI next year, so that's useful (!)"

Two hours later on the same day, 19 November, he writes again: "John's line to me was that if revenue was better than forecast RPI would do, and if it wasn't then RPI+1 would need to be put in."

In another email, Mr Allen said: "John Ross ... understood and accepted the potential issue" about the difference between the Mayor's public statements and what he had agreed in private."

One senior serving TfL official said: "The reason the TfL business plan was amended was not because the Mayor wanted to change the policy [for fares increases] but because they wanted to cover up the policy.

"The Mayor's office made very clear to Peter Hendy that if he went along with a cosmetic change to the business plan, then fares could still rise above inflation after the election. Our commitments, such as Crossrail, Metronet and the Tube investment programme, mean we have no alternative but to raise fares above inflation, and Ken knew that perfectly well."

Mr Livingstone was today accused by his Conservative opponent, Boris Johnson, of being misleading over the fares saga: "It an utter scandal that the Mayor can secretly agree with officials that fares will have to go up after the election, then go to the electorate and tell them they won't."

Mr Livingstone's campaign was unavailable for comment.

Reader views (9)

 Add your view

I 'd be careful what you believe in The Standard about Ken.

They have a long history of hating each other. His policies are pretty much socialist and the Standard is a Tory paper.

Also, if Everything ran smoothly in London with the Mayor, the Standard would have nothing to write about. It has an agenda to get a mayor that will make headlines and sell papers.

- James Windsor, London, England, 26/04/2008 00:43
Report abuse

We have to pay for Crossrail and other transport improvements its a shame people can't be honest about how this will be done. It's not the fare increases that are a problem it's the dishonest approach by denying its going to happen. What are the other holes Ken is covering up?

- Gez, Stonecot, 25/04/2008 17:15
Report abuse

It's in 1984 - doublethink.

- David, Crawley UK, 25/04/2008 15:49
Report abuse

And another example of why he isn't fit for office. He must think we're all stupid. I am hoping this time next week we'll be hearing that he's lost his job and change is coming to City Hall.

- William, Islington, London, 25/04/2008 15:05
Report abuse

What has happened with all that fare increase money? Oh yes I forgot Red Ken gives the tickets away for free to his friends, family, council workers, under-18s, and so many other social cases... No wonder the system is always overpopulated, slow and dirty.

- Marian, London, NW1, 25/04/2008 14:36
Report abuse

On the basis that - Ken Livingstone's top advisers agreed that the Mayor misled Londoners when he denied planning big post-election bus and Tube fare increases - Ken Livingstone "MUST" now resign with immediate effect!

This Is London readers do "not" need politicians (in City Hall) that "simply cannot be trusted" when we already have so many over in Westminster that wouldn't recognize the truth if it hit them in the face!

- Fraser, Telford Park, 25/04/2008 13:54
Report abuse

Yet again, more lies from Ken!

- James, London, 25/04/2008 13:42
Report abuse

Travel card 1-6 cost £4.70 Jan 05, but £7.00 Jan 08, virtual 50% rise in 3 years. Livingstone is a tax maniac.

- Don Stone, London, 25/04/2008 12:55
Report abuse

Has it got to the stage where we expect politicians to lie at every level, that we don't bother taking them to task over it. How red Ken has feathered his nest so well, for so long, is a tribute to his ingenuity, and the failure of the electorate to get rid of him. I have no doubt he will still be there long after this election

- Dave Robinson, Schuylkill Haven USA, 25/04/2008 12:54
Report abuse


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.


 

Don't Miss
  • London Gateway

    Supersize superport: London Gateway

    London Gateway, the £1.5bn container port under construction on the Thames at Thurrock, will have capacity to unload six of the world's largest ships at one time and have as much impact on the capital as a new airport or half a dozen Westfield shopping centres
  • Matthew Williamson

    One stylish affair: Matthew Williamson

    With London Fashion Week kicking off on Friday, British designer Matthew Williamson tells Rosamund Urwin about breaking up with his ex, post-show partying and his new model man
London's Weather
Tonight
Partly Cloudy Night
4°c
Morning
Cloudy
8°c
5 day forecast