Boris Johnson's deputy faces damaging new allegations that he misled the public by claiming to be a magistrate
More...
Comment: C-charge cash
Evening Standard30.04.08
The analysis we report today of congestion charge revenues, by a respected City economist, suggests that the scheme has raised much less for public transport than promised. Two other assessments reach a similar conclusion.
Though the charge, now £8, and fines of up to £150, have extracted over £1 billion from Londoners over five years, the hefty payments to Capita to manage the scheme and the capital costs mean that the surplus available for improving public transport could be as low as £10 million. Transport for London maintains that the scheme has made a cumulative total of £382 million - but even that falls short of the promised £200 million a year for five years.
At a time when Ken Livingstone's management of spending has become a key issue in his re-election campaign, the gap between the promised £1 billion over five years and the reality is stark. The charge itself has brought considerable benefits, reducing the number of cars entering the central zone by as many as 70,000 a day. Without it, there might have been gridlock by this stage, though traffic speeds now are in many cases as low as they were before the charge came in and the improvement in air quality has been questionable.
If re-elected, Mr Livingstone will impose a £25-aday charge on cars with higher carbon emissions. These include not only 4x4s but also many ordinary family cars such as the Ford Galaxy. This addition represents a mutation of the original scheme, which was sold to the public as a measure to reduce congestion, into a green tax of unproven environmental merit.
Mr Livingstone may hope the new measure will at last boost the revenue from congestion charging to a level where it brings in a surplus closer to what he originally promised. However, it will do so at substantial cost to many families. The charge has been popular with many and has been considered a success but that verdict may need to be modified in the light of its disappointing financial returns.
Link to:
Reader views (3)
Here's a sample of the latest views published. You can click view all to read all views that readers have sent in.
So £618m to £990m expected revenue is missing? Where has it gone? Capita cannot have swallowed all of this. Mr Livingstone claims his accounts are completely open and subject to scrutiny. Is the London Assembly looking into this? If this is an overspend, it rivals the Olympic build. But is this an overspend, or are the funds moving in some other unforeseen direction?
- Blackstone, London
Livingstone's £25 charge on cars with higher emissions is completely at odds with the daily chaos and gridlock he has caused in South London on the Blackwall tunnel approach by suspending the "tidal flow" which allowed drivers to use the southbound tunnel from 6:30am. This system worked well for many years and Livingstone suspended it it on some spurious excuse about bad driving in the tunnel. If that's the case get the police to intervene with those responsible. So much for him wishing to improve air quality.
- John L, Wapping
Livingstone's encyclopaedia of lies as he tramples over the law and liberty of drivers and genuine Londoners is breathtaking in its demolition effect. This man has brought great disgrace to the office of Mayor, has lied his way through his tenure and must go and never return. It will take a while for Boris to repair the damage, but give me Boris "Goodheart" to "Livingswine" any day of the week, year or century. Hopefully his dismissal of the Law will land him where he belongs, in Clink with the Keys tossed in the Thames.
- Mike Em, London
