Weather Afternoon: 10°c Sunny spells Tonight: 4°c Partly Cloudy Night

Mayor

Our online polls prove a winner for accuracy

Peter Kellner, President of YouGov, the Standard's election pollster
6 May 2008


Last Thursday, as the election-day edition of the Evening Standard started rolling off the presses, I told colleagues and journalists: "Tomorrow night, either Ken Livingstone or I will be out of a job."

I was not joking. YouGov gave a final forecast that Boris Johnson would win by between 47 and 53 per cent. It was our sixth mayoral campaign poll and the sixth to show Boris ahead by a comfortable margin. Six polls by other companies had all disagreed, either showing the candidates neck-and-neck, or Livingstone ahead.

Had Livingstone won, the clamour to condemn YouGov's panel-based internet polling methods would have been deafening. I would have no excuses. I would have to go.

In the event, the result was exactly as we predicted. It is our rivals who must now rethink their methods and, to their credit, our friends at Mori have already announced a review of the pro-Livingstone bias in their figures.

Here is my advice to the traditional polling companies:

• Recognise you have a long-standing problem in London. Most telephone polls in 2000 and 2004 significantly overstated Livingstone's support.

• Rethink your sampling methods. Response rates for telephone polling companies in London are worse than in the rest of Britain. Well under 20 per cent of calls result in an interview. And, because telephone pollsters dial only landline numbers, they question too many people who stay at home, and too few of the many Londoners who lead socially active lives. In contrast, YouGov's panel members can respond to our surveys at any time from any computer within a 48-hour window.

• Make sure your samples are politically representative. It is not enough to have the right proportions of men and women, young and old, rich and poor, black and white. To achieve a sample that is fit for purpose, the aim of the survey must be considered. For a political survey, this means ensuring that the sample contains the right mix of voters by party allegiance. We at YouGov use sophisticated techniques to ensure this. Last week's performance demonstrates their effectiveness.

• Take interviewer effects into account. One reason why national polls underestimated Tory support in the Nineties was that they failed to allow for "shy Tories" - people reluctant to admit to a stranger on the phone that they would vote for John Major. This time phone pollsters may have encountered "bashful Borisians". YouGov does not have this problem. By entering answers anonymously on a computer, our respondents are more willing to come clean on a variety of topics: sex, drugs, tax - and even voting Tory.

Reader views (0)

 Add your view

No comments have so far been submitted.


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.


 

Don't Miss
  • London Gateway

    Supersize superport: London Gateway

    London Gateway, the £1.5bn container port under construction on the Thames at Thurrock, will have capacity to unload six of the world's largest ships at one time and have as much impact on the capital as a new airport or half a dozen Westfield shopping centres
  • Matthew Williamson

    One stylish affair: Matthew Williamson

    With London Fashion Week kicking off on Friday, British designer Matthew Williamson tells Rosamund Urwin about breaking up with his ex, post-show partying and his new model man
London's Weather
Afternoon
Sunny spells
10°c
Tonight
Partly Cloudy Night
4°c
5 day forecast