Floods, heatwaves and drought could cause a virtual collapse of the capital unless action is taken to address climate change, Boris Johnson has warned
More...
Mayor: higher charges for gas-guzzlers hurt families
David Williams and Coraline Fournoils24.06.08
Mayor Boris Johnson today criticised councils for penalising families with "gas-guzzler" parking charges.
Nearly a third of London boroughs charge higher permit fees for vehicles that pollute more. Richmond launched the first emissions-related tariff last year. It charges £300 for an annual permit for cars with the biggest engines, and £450 for a second such vehicle. Previously, permits cost £45 to £100.
Now Camden, Hackney, Haringey, Islington, Kensington and Chelsea, Lambeth, Richmond, Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest have similar schemes, and Southwark and Sutton are considering introducing them.
Today, Mr Johnson's spokesman said: "The Mayor shares the goal of the boroughs to reduce carbon dioxide emissions but he is not convinced this sort of scheme is the best way of doing so. Rather than penalise the families that own larger cars, which might be hit by this type of charge, his focus is on reducing emissions by reducing congestion."
He said Transport for London was drawing up plans to rephase traffic lights and promote cycling and walking as well as encouraging people to "drive more efficiently".
Many councils have ruled out a policy of linking parking with emissions. Bexley councillor Peter Craske said the idea was "absurd" and Colin Smith, Bromley's executive councillor for environment, said he feared residents would see graded permits as an "opportunistic" way of making money.
But Richmond's cabinet member for traffic, transport and parking, David Trigg, said: "The purpose of this policy is to change people's behaviour, specifically by encouraging them to choose less-polluting vehicles when they change cars. I am very confident it will be effective long-term."
Camden says its scheme will be "broadly financially neutral". Haringey conceded that its CO2 charges would boost income but said it hoped drivers would be encouraged into smaller cars.
Link to:
Reader views (10)
Here's a sample of the latest views published. You can click view all to read all views that readers have sent in.
What hurts family is poor health caused by air pollution, and a future overshadowed by climate change. Most high emissions cars I see on the roads only have one person in them anyway - completely unnecessary.
It's so painful to watch this buffoon blunder along undoing all the difficult but beneficial work done by the previous Mayor.
- Lorraine Prince, London
What is so wrong about making the polluter pay? And how does scrapping the congestion charge contribute to reducing congestion?
- Billy Blighty, Sydney Australia
My father has severe breathing problems, but looks like 4x4 drivers take priority. Thanks Boris!
- Graham Cox, Hemel Hempstead Herts
Add your comment
