Afternoon:
14°c
Speed skater Sarah Lindsay is to swap her blades for a bike in a bid for Olympic glory in her home city in 2012
More...
Commentary: We must not fail the capital's young athletes again
Sebastian Coe, chairman of the London 2012 organising committee01.09.08
Not in my wildest dreams could I have imagined Team GB would finish fourth in the medals table in Beijing, even though we knew the athletes were in great shape going into the Games.
Their achievements mean that in the run-up to the 2012 Olympics there will be no better opportunity in my lifetime to drive sports legacy. In terms of boosting participation in sport in this country the red carpet has been rolled out with a gilt edge attached.
But there seems no point in driving participation without the facilities to satisfy the demand. In this respect London will benefit in particular because of the muchneeded athletics, swimming and cycling venues the Games will leave behind.
If you look closely at where the British Olympians returning from China have come from - or are based - you will see that London has not been punching its weight. It's no surprise to me that those achieving success have had access to top-class facilities such as Ponds Forge aquatics centre in Sheffield, the national cycling centre in Manchester and regional rowing facilities.
London needs to redress this imbalance because if the talent has to relocate to other parts of the country - as has been the case with divers and cyclists - then you lose the really important dynamic that is role models in your own backyard.
I believe the greatest driver of participation is in Olympic champions such as Chris Hoy, Christine Ohuruogu and canoeist Tim Brabants. That's not to say that is enough on its own. You have to be able to be street smart and convert those medals into mass participation.
The challenge for central government, the Mayor and London councils is to come up with smart strategies to make the most of the springboard Beijing has provided. They will have to answer to a more sophisticated type of sports fan who will not just be content with 16 days of sport.
There's a generation that has seen their children let down and they want to see a better deal for their grandchildren. They want to see medals, but they want a dividend for their grandchildren and they will make a judgment in 2012 and beyond.
I am conscious that I made a commitment in Singapore that nudged us across the line when we were bidding for the Games and I will always have a niggling conscience if I don't think we are delivering on that.
A key feature of the legacy is what becomes of the new 2012 venues, and Boris Johnson quite rightly took a keen interest in this from the outset. There can be no justification for an 80,000-seat stadium in east London or a 20,000-seat aquatics centre that would be at capacity perhaps once a decade for a world swimming championships. Legacy plans will need refining and the London Development Agency will need to take the lead on that.
We are working painstakingly with the international equestrian federation on the riding facility in Greenwich Park and I am very comfortable about where we are. Of course we want legacy but it's not just about bricks and mortar. It's also about familiarising young people with sports, such as equestrianism, which ultimately drives participation.
We need to learn the lessons of previous neglect and it still hurts me to think of the lost opportunity for my sport of athletics in the Eighties.
We returned from Moscow and the Los Angeles Games with a sackful of track medals. I went back to Enfield and Haringey Athletic Club with John Regis and Daley Thompson. It was a Sunday morning and there was a huge queue of kids wanting to become club members. I flatter myself that they wanted to become middle distance runners but they probably wanted to become decathletes or sprinters.
I just knew that we couldn't do anything about it because there was no system in place to take them in and most of them drifted out of sport. We went another 10 years without a world-class decathlete and I wonder how many of those kids were potential Daley Thompsons. I don't ever want to see that again.
If we end up with that situation repeated in 2012 then we would have failed.
Reader views (2)
I agree on the legacy need, but in some areas it will not be delivered.
Lord Coe mentions divers travelling from London to Sheffield to train, sadly true and the Olympic aquatic centre will at last give a world class venue in London. BUT. sadly it is pulling funding away from local facilities.
It's no good having one world class facility, but nowhere locally that kids who are enthused can go to get involved! The Beijing experience has proven one thing, we don't have enough facilities to offer anything like the experience that people want. There have been many enquiries about diving, Chris Snodee at the diving institute had about 500! but there is no infrastructure in place where thses people can go to even try the sport at a local level unles they live in one of the 8 Boroughs that still have a pool with a diving board!
In 1988 we identified that, by 2000 we would need in London, 4 regional pools with international standard boards, plus 25 local borough level facilities offering club, lesson and leisure use.
We now have (currently) no international facility until Crystal palace re-opens, and only 7 pools that offer public access to diving (there are 3 that are club use only)Now in greater London that's about 1 pool per million people! 3 of those pools are in the east, none in the west.
Unless we get rapid and major investment in facility stock we will waste the Olympic legacy as we will be unable to offer anywhere for people to even try the sport.
- John Whitby, Peterborough, Cambs
There can also be no justification in spending £12m on equestrian events in Greenwich Park which will have absolutely no real legacy value to the sport whatsoever apart from giving the horse crowd a very pretty (and iconic, unquote) background for the TV pictures. Seb Coe is not listening to the very real concerns of many local and national people about a) damage to the fabric of the Park and serious disruption to normal activities, and b) the very small crowds which will fit into the Park for such events (familiarising what young people with sports such as equestrianism?)compared to the 90,000 a day who turn up to Burleigh. Move it there, give them some of the money to spruce themselves up a bit, then bus several thousand youngsters down there to see it all.
- Handsoff, Blackheath, London
