Weather Afternoon: 10°c Sunny spells Tonight: 4°c Partly Cloudy Night

Olympics

Olympic stadium
Costly: Security could push the cost of the 2012 Games beyond £10bn

Security costs 'will send 2012 bill over £10bn'

Matthew Beard, Sports News Correspondent
29 Sep 2008


Escalating security costs for the London Olympics will drive the budget for the 2012 Games over the £10 billion mark, it has been claimed.

Anti-terrorism measures will push the cost of Games security to an estimated £1.5 billion - nearly three times the original estimate - according to insiders.

The claim comes amid continued delays over a comprehensive security plan being devised by the Home Office and the Metropolitan Police.

Extra measures to protect athletes and spectators from an attack include drafting in the Army. Military helicopters will patrol overhead and jets will be on stand-by to protect a no-fly zone over the Olympic stadium in Stratford.

The Ministry of Defence would charge the Olympic authorities for such a deployment. The security operation is expected to be the largest in peacetime Britain with the two-week event classed as a major terrorist target. However detailed planning for policing and security is in its early stages.

Games chiefs are juggling security with the desire to stage a more open and accessible Games than in Beijing where large parts of the city were off limits to citizens.

Concern over Games security were raised at an Olympic fringe meeting of the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham yesterday.

Shadow Olympics minister Hugh Robertson said: "One of the Government's pledges to the International Olympic Committee is that we make the Games safe.

"We have seen repeatedly at previous Games that the security budget is always the one that goes way beyond original estimates. That is why it is so concerning that there is still no costed and fully-scoped security plan and why security is the biggest single concern for the project at the moment."

Mr Robertson said he was concerned that the police might try to strong-arm the Home Office - the government department in charge of security - into paying for security improvements beyond the needs of the Games. Police demands for a new command and control centre to be built by 2012 to serve the Games are thought to have added to delays.

The total bill for the Games stands at £9.3 billion but that is based on security costs of £838 million. If the security bill reaches £1.5 billion as insiders suggest, it would send the budget beyond £10 billion despite pledges from Olympics minister Tessa Jowell and London Mayor Boris Johnson that the limit was £9.3 billion.

Olympics chiefs based their security planning and budget on the Sydney Olympics, but these had to be redrawn after the London bombings of 7 July 2005 - the day after the 2012 bid win.

Assistant commissioner Tarique Ghaffur was placed in charge of 2012 planning but he protested when Commissioner Sir Ian Blair wanted to strip him of his remit. Mr Ghaffur is suspended pending his case for racial discrimination.

An Olympic source said: "There have been massive delays and this has the potential to take the whole thing way over budget."

A Home Office spokesman said: "The Government and its partners in security are committed to the safety and security of the London 2012 Olympics, and a funding envelope of £600 million has been agreed.

"An integrated, costed security plan is being produced, for ministerial agreement by the end of the year.

"This will cover strategic options for a range of security measures, including fraud and financial crime prevention and protection, counter-terrorism, identity assurance and personal protection."

Reader views (7)

 Add your view

Doubt it Fred because the they liked the good news stories of our athletes winning medal after medal in China...rather than the real issues of the country and the poor government.

- Mark, Watford, 30/09/2008 16:41
Report abuse

Cancel these stupid Olympics. Does Brown have the guts to do this?

- Frederick, London, UK, 30/09/2008 07:35
Report abuse

If you get away with 10BN pounds consider yourselves lucky. I would bet 25 to 30BN pounds.

- John (Brit Exp Pat), Phoenix USA, 30/09/2008 00:12
Report abuse

10B pounds - are you out of your mind - 18B american dollar and change. No olympics is worth that kind of money even if you rebuild London which Lord know, needs it. Anyone with an ounce of greed must try to get in line for some of this money which of course will go much higher before the Olympics. You know the old saying, "Show me the Money". Good Luck

- Rich, San Angelo USA, 29/09/2008 22:22
Report abuse

not even allowing them to build their mega-mosque right next door is going to stop every fundamentalist nutter living high on the hog here from trying to blow the Olympics to kingdom come. We might as well build a huge target with pictures of allah cavorting in the nude - would not make it a more attractive prospect for some suicide bomb capers.

- Squiz, Islington, 29/09/2008 20:08
Report abuse

In the light of the present economic crisis, and the inevitable long term period of recovery, surely it now makes sense to scrap the idea of our presenting the next olympics and putting the vast sums of money involved to better use elsewhere. After all the whole show is just to further massage the inflated egos of a few athletes already over exposed to the public.
GB can always apply again to present them when times are better.

- Anthony John Calladine, WESTON SUPERMARE. GREAT BRITAIN., 29/09/2008 18:52
Report abuse

I refuse to pay any of it!

- Aria, South London, 29/09/2008 14:20
Report abuse


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.


 

Matthew Beard, Sports News Correspondent, on Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

     

  • Britain's athletes could be banned from 2012 for criticising the team Olympic site British athletes risk being banned from the Olympics if they criticise team-mates or sponsors under rules that cover tattoos, contact lenses...
  • Duty calls: diver's soldier boyfriend will miss medal bid Tonia Couch Team GB diver Tonia Couch today revealed that her Royal Marine boyfriend is serving in Afghanistan so he cannot be poolside to cheer her on...
  • Wanted: supplier of Olympic insoles Olympics Deals worth more than £35 million for essential but obscure products for the Olympics - from shoe insoles to rain shields for the...
  • Olympics boost £100m Fashion Week Stella McCartney London is set for the most star-studded Fashion Week ever, with sales forecast to surpass £100million as the capital cashes in on hosting...
  • In pursuit of glory, women cyclists aim to be fastest ever Rowsell Two Team GB cyclists today pledged to go "faster than anyone has ever gone" in the Olympics
  • Stones would love to play at the Games, says Ronnie Wood Ronnie Wood Guitarist revealed that Rolling Stones had been in discussions about playing during the Games and in other concerts
  • Who put the sex into cycling? Victoria Pendleton Make-up, good grooming and a preference for designer gear - Britain's young cyclists are a sponsor's dream, says Matt Majendie
  • Death on the Roman road  Knud Enemark Jensen Like too many athletes, Knud Enemark Jensen believed drugs would give him the edge. Instead, as Steve Redgrave recalls, they killed the...
  • Road cycling with Lizzie Armitstead Lizzie Armitstead The Evening Standard's Bella Blissett goes to Richmond Park to cycle with British Olympic hopeful Lizzie Armitstead
  • Ross Edgar: They say millions of condoms are taken. A lot more people take them than use them Ross Edgar The Evening Standard's Cathy Wood speaks to track cyclist Ross Edgar
  •