Morning:
11°c
Britain's leading student athletes will be the first to use the 80,000-seat Olympic stadium in a rehearsal for the 2012 Games
More...
Olympic village loses 600 flats in bid to cut bill
Matthew Beard, Sports News Correspondent21.10.08
THE capacity of the Olympic village has been cut by a further 600 flats as 2012 chiefs struggle to contain costs.
The Standard has learnt that just 2,700 apartments two thirds of the original plan will be built for the Games for 16,500 athletes and officials with an average of six per apartment.
Scaled-down plans have emerged as the Olympic Delivery Authority seeks to plug a shortfall in private funding for the £1 billion project.
Games chiefs have been forced to gradually reduce the size after developer Lendlease struggled to raise its share of the funding.
Just four months ago ODA chief executive David Higgins told MPs that the credit crunch meant the number of flats would be cut from 4,200 to 3,300.
Higgins told the Public Accounts Committee that only flats needed for the Games would be built. The move is thought to have cut the bill for athletes' accommodation by up to £500million.
The cuts mean that lower-ranking Olympic officials will not be able to stay in the village and will now stay in West End hotels instead.
The 2,700 flats are likely to be reconfigured after the Games for maximum value on the open market. The new layout for athletes is expected to result in a squeeze on their accommodation compared with Beijing, where 14,500 athletes and officials lived in 3,276 flats.
Most athletes lived in two and four-bedroom apartments while some enjoyed the luxury of their own flats. Plaudits for the Beijing village came from Britain's chef de mission Simon Clegg, who said it had "raised the bar", and International Olympic Committee president Jacques Rogge who described the complex as the "best ever".
Cutbacks in the size of the village have been achieved by mothballing plans for four high-rise blocks. The ODA has applied for planning permission but the flats will not be built until after the Games and will become part of the second phase of residential development which is estimated to cost £3.5bn and be completed in 2020.Medium and low-rise flats have taken priority because they are more adaptable to athletes' needs. Games chiefs have pledged that athletes will not have to live above the ninth floor to avoid them having to traipse upstairs.
Cost-cutting changes are being made by the ODA with the organising committee, Locog, which will have to seek approval from the International Olympic Committee. Locog has guaranteed that there will be a bed in the village for every athlete even those who wish to come to Stratford once their events have ended in outlying venues.
An ODA spokesman said: "We have been reviewing the scope of the Olympic Village to ensure we only build what is necessary for the Games while ensuring we meet IOC requirements."
Reader views (6)
Tents in Hyde Park could be the answer, and, within budget!
- Kevin Sullivan, Roehampton, London.
Well that lake in the picture will not be there after the olympics, health and safety will make sure of that, unless they intent to employ a permanent life guard.
- David, Disneyland
Little of this story makes sense: what is a 'Chef de Mission', and who elected Mr Clegg (who he?) to be one? Bet it's well paid though. The fact that this Pooh-Bah enjoyed rolling in the gravy in Beijing doesn't oblige us to keep him in the style he's become accustomed to, does it? And who's designing 9-storey blocks of flats without lifts? Or not? And is exercise bad for athletes now? All very confusing.
What IS clear is the bottom line: when funds are short, the Olympic greediacs get first turn at the trough, and the 'legacy' goes to hell.
I've got a better idea: scale down the whole thing - run the 90 metres, the 350 metres, a 16 mile marathon. Makes about as much sense.
- Mdj, Leyton, London
There are thousands of apartments being built across the river in bow just a stones throw from the site, most of which are going to be unsold or repossessed from buy to let landlords, why not use those instead of building yet more 'luxury' 2 bed flats in the area?
- Nick, London
Olympic village costs spiral, cutting costs imperative,If they want to save even more money, can i suggest they put up tents.
- Mr.S.Port, London
We cannot afford these Olympics. Crash Gordon and his bunch lived way beyond their wasteful means. This East London development project is a bottomless pit. Could not have chosen a worst time!
- Peteo, London
